Sentinel node biopsy in early breast cancer at the Hospital Comarcal La Linea (Spain)
Jack Antonio Díaz Brito1, Sofía Vásquez Navarrete2, Juan Antonio Muñoz3, Yolanda Santaella Guardiola4, José González Sánchez3, Vicente Vega Ruiz5 and Miguel Velasco García5
1 General Surgery Department, Hospital La Línea, La Línea, Cádiz, Spain
2 Pathology Department, Hospital La Línea, La Línea, Cádiz, Spain
3 Radiology Department, Hospital La Línea, La Línea, Cádiz, Spain
4 Nuclear Medicine Department, Hospital Punta Europa, Algeciras, Cádiz, Spain
5 General Surgery Department, Hospital Universitario Puerto Real, Puerto Real, Cádiz, Spain
Correspondence to: Jack Antonio Díaz Brito. Email: email@example.com
Objective: Our objective was to determine the identification and the percentage of false negatives in sentinel node biopsies in patients with early breast cancer at the Hospital La Línea (Spain), during the period between November 2007 and September 2010.
Methods: We collected 50 patients with early breast cancer, without clinical and ultrasonographic involvement of axillary nodes, from November 2007 to September 2010. We used the vital dye in the first 20 patients and the combined technique of vital dye and albumin labelled with technetium 99 in the other 30 patients. The site of injection for patients using blue dye was subdermal for palpable tumours and periareolar for non-palpable tumours. The technique of injection with the radioisotope for patients for palpable and most non-palpable tumours was the periareolar technique. We used albumin labelled with technetium 99. In seven patients with non-palpable tumours, we used the sentinel node occult lesion localisation (SNOLL) technique. The sentinel node biopsy was examined during surgery, with the frozen section examination and imprint as follows: the sentinel node was cut in three transversal sections along the axis and five frozen sections of each portion were done at a distance of 60 μm each; in total, 15–20 frozen sections and three imprints were done for each sentinel node. The axillary dissection was completed in the first 17 patients, and we performed total axillary dissection on the remaining patients if the sentinel node was positive for metastasis.
Results: The sentinel nodes were identified in 49 of 50 patients (98%). The patient in whom we did not identify the sentinel node was a patient in the combined technique. The number of nodes identified in the patients with vital dye was one sentinel node, and with the combined technique, it was two sentinel nodes. The false-negative rate was 8% (four patients); the micrometastasis was the principal factor of the false-negative rate (p < 0.05). The cases of false negatives were present at the beginning of the study with the use of the blue dyes; this factor was statistically significant (p < 0.05). The tumour size, the vascular invasion, and the periganglionar adipose tissue invasion were statistically significant for the presentation of axillary metastasis (p < 0.05).
Conclusion: This study shows that the micrometastasis and the use of vital dye were the principal factors for the presentation of the false-negative rate. The size of the tumour, the vascular invasion, and the periganglionar adipose tissue invasion were statistically significant for the appearance of the axillary metastasis.
Keywords: early breast cancer, axillary staging, sentinel node biopsy, SNOLL, micrometastasis
Cancer is the second leading cause of death in developed countries after cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases .
Breast cancer is the most common malignancy among women and is the leading cause of cancer deaths in women . In Spain, the frequency increases by 2% annually. The incidence is still increasing every day since 1950. This situation can be explained by the increase of elderly women, detection using mammography screening, dietary changes, and the delay in having children [3, 4].
Axillary involvement is the most important predictor in breast cancer. This fact determines the importance of axillary staging by sentinel node biopsy. Recent studies have shown that minimal involvement in sentinel node biopsy (isolated tumour cells, micrometastasis) and even macrometastasis carries the same overall survival and disease-free survival to 5 years, performing sentinel node biopsy or axillary dissection [5–9].
In 2007, we performed the first sentinel node biopsy for breast cancer in the Campo de Gibraltar. Since then, we have treated 50 women with early breast cancer, to realise this technique and to avoid the morbidity associated with axillary dissection.
Materials and method
We collected patients who attended the outpatient clinic of the Hospital La Línea, referred by their medical practitioners and from the screening program for the surveillance of breast cancer. Our Hospital has 180 beds and covers a population of 130,000 inhabitants.
—We admit patients with early breast cancer tumours T1–T2 without clinical and/or ultrasonographic axillary involvement.
—Patients with multifocal or multicentric early breast cancer.
—Patients with ductal carcinoma in situ in the breast that requires total mastectomy.
—Patients with previous surgery of the breast for benign conditions.
—Patients with clinical or ultrasonographic involvement of axillary lymph nodes.
—Patients with advanced breast cancer and in treatment with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
—Inflammatory breast cancer patients.
The patient is hospitalised the day after surgery. All the patients are transferred by ambulance to the Nuclear Medicine Service of the Hospital Punta Europa Algeciras. The distance is 18 km. The Nuclear Medicine Services use a nanocoll of human serum albumin labelled with 99Tc, size 80–90 nm.
Previous asepsis of the breast, 4 millicurie dissolved in 0.1–0.2 mL of normal saline are injected in the periareolar area for the patients with palpable tumours (Figure 1).
Figure 1. Radioisotope injection, palpable tumours.
In most patients with non-palpable tumours, we use the injection in the periareolar area as explained before. In seven patients, we used the SNOLL technique, which is explained below.
The SNOLL technique is sentinel node occult lesion localisation, which identifies the sentinel node and the non-palpable lesion of the breast. This technique uses a nanocoll of human serum albumin, which is 80 nm in size and is then injected into the tumour using ultrasonographic guidance. After the injection, a gammagraphic image will be done to show the sentinel node and the tumour. On the day of surgery, the nuclear medicine doctor and the general surgeon identify the tumour and the sentinel node, with the help of the gamma probe [10, 11].
The Nuclear Medicine Service of the Hospital Punta Europa (Algeciras) injected 4 millicurie of nanocoll of human serum albumin dissolved in 0.2–0.3 mL of normal saline into the tumour, for the SNOLL technique and with ultrasonographic guidance (Figure 2).
The gammagraphic images are made at 12 minutes, 30 minutes, and 1 hour after the injection of the radioisotope, until the sentinel and the tumour were displayed. The day after, in the operation room, the nuclear medicine doctor and the general surgeon identify the tumour and sentinel node with the help of the gamma probe.
Figure 2. SNOLL technique, ultrasonographic guidance.
We used methylene blue in 48 patients and isosulfan blue in two patients. The site of injection for the palpable tumours was the subdermal area near to the tumour, and in the patients with non-palpable tumours, it was the periareolar area. The blue dye was injected immediately after the anaesthesia induction, in a percentage of 3 mL (Figure 3).
Figure 3. Sentinel node biopsy identification with blue dye.
Sentinel node frozen section
When the sentinel node was identified, by blue staining or by the combined technique, it was sent to the pathology department for intraoperative examination. The sentinel node was cut into three portions across the long axis. The pathologist realised three imprints of these cuts, and then each portion of the sentinel node was cut by frozen section at a distance of 60 μm each. In total, three imprints and 15–20 frozen sections were done for each sentinel node. The remaining tissue of the sentinel node was left to be examined with paraffin (Figure 4).
Figure 4. Imprint and frozen section examination of the sentinel node.
A statistical analysis was performed with the statistical support of Cadiz University using Windows/SPSS 20.0. We described the next statistical techniques: frequency tables for qualitative variables, descriptive tables for quantitative variables, Pearson coefficient correlation, analysis of variance (ANOVA), and chi square test. In all cases, statistical t test was done with a significance level p < 0.05.
During the period from November 2007 to September 2010, we analysed 50 patients, all women who completed the criteria for sentinel node biopsy for early breast cancer. The average age of the patients was 60 years (range: 29–84 years).
The tumour characteristics are displayed in Table 1.
Table 1. Tumour characteristics.
Infiltrating ductal carcinoma, middle grade, and positive hormonal receptors were the principal tumour characteristics in our study.
Sentinel node identification
We used the blue dye in all of the patients. In the first 20 patients, we used the vital dye for the identification of the sentinel node, and in the other 30 patients, we used the combined technique.
The rate of identification of the group of vital dye was 100%, and with the combined technique, it was 96%. Complete identification of 50 patients was 98% (Table 2).
There was a patient in whom we did not identify the sentinel node; this patient was a 66-year-old woman with a tumour of 2 cm in size in the upper inner quadrant of the left breast, an infiltrating ductal carcinoma with middle grade. We did an axillary dissection, and one of the 11 lymph nodes was compromised by the tumour.
Table 2. Sentinel node identification.
In our study, we found an 8% (four patients) false-negative rate. There were three patients with micrometastasis and another one with macrometastasis who were not seen in the frozen section examination but were seen in the paraffin examination.
The false negatives were presented at the beginning of the study with the use of blue dyes. The chi square test, the fisher test, and the likelihood ratio showed a statistically significant difference between the use of blue dyes and the presentation of false negatives (p < 0.05).
The presence of micrometastasis was statistically significant for the presentation of the false negatives (p < 0.05).
In our study, due to administrative and technical problems, we did not use immunohistochemical staining in the frozen section examination of the sentinel node.
The correlation between the qualitative variables and the quantitative variables was performed through ANOVA. In our study, we found that the size of tumour, the vascular invasion, and the periganglionar adipose tissue invasion were statistically significant for the presence of axillary metastasis (p < 0.05).
Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women and is the primary cause of death for cancer in this population. The literature review showed that the most common tumour characteristics are size between 1 and 2 cm, infiltrating ductal carcinoma represents 71.4%–89.3%, the most common grade is the middle grade, vascular invasion ranging from 31.6% to 42.5%, oestrogen receptors up to 81%, and progesterone receptors up to 64% [12–15].
In our study, the tumour characteristics are similar to the literature; the mean tumour size was 1.9 cm; the infiltrating ductal carcinoma represents the 72%; the middle grade represented 64% of cases; and the oestrogen receptors and progesterone receptors were 78 and 82%, respectively.
The percentage of identification of the sentinel node with blue dyes in the large series ranging between 65% and 97% [16–19], and with the combined technique, it was between 96% and 99.7% [20–24]. Our study shows that sentinel node identification with the use of blue dyes was 100%, and with the combined technique, it was 96.6%, overall 98%.
In Table 3, we compare our study with other reports in the literature concerning the percentage of identification rate of false negative and other parameters.
The rate of false negative in the literature varies between 0% and 29%, average 8%. This great disparity is due to the number of patients, inclusion criteria, detection rate, and the technique with blue dyes or in combination with radioisotopes .
This study shows that the false-negative rate was 8%; micrometastasis was the principal factor for the presentation of these cases of false negatives (p < 0.05).
The use of blue dyes in our study was statistically significant for the presentation of false negatives (p < 0.05).
The size of tumour, the vascular invasion, and the periganglionar adipose tissue invasion are independent and combined factors for the presentation of axillary metastasis for breast cancer [28–29]. In this study, there was a statistical significance between the presentation of axillary metastasis and the size of tumour and the presence of vascular invasion and the periganglionar adipose tissue invasion (p < 0.05).
Table 3. Studies of sentinel node identification and other parameters.
This study shows that a rate of sentinel node identification using the blue dyes was 100%, and with the combined technique, it was 96.6%, overall 98%. There was a statistical significance with the presentation of the false-negative cases and the use of blue dyes for the sentinel node identification, because all the false-negative cases were present at the beginning of the study, with the use of this method of identification. Micrometastases were the principal factor for the presentation of the false-negative cases, which were not seen at the frozen section examination of the sentinel node. The size of tumour, the vascular invasion, and the periganglionar adipose tissue were statistically significant for the presentation of axillary lymph node metastasis.
1. Ferlay J, Autier P, Boniol M, Heanue M, Colombet M and Boyle P (2007) Estimates of the cancer incidence and mortality in Europe in 2006 Ann Oncol 18(3) 581–92 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdl498 PMID: 17287242
2. Verdecchia A, Francisci S, Brenner H, et al (2007) Recent cancer survival in Europea 2000-2002 period análisis of EUROCARE-4 data Lancet Oncol 8(9) 784–96 DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(07)70246-2 PMID: 17714993
3. Pollán M, García Mendizabal M, Pérez Gómez B, et al (2007) Situación epidemiológica del cáncer de mama en España Psicooncologia 4(2–3) 231–48
4. López Albente G, Pollán M, Aragonés N, et al (2005) La situación del cáncer en España (Madrid: Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo)
6. Galimberti V, Botteri E, Chifu C, et al (2012) Can we avoid axillary dissection in the micrometastatic sentinel node in breast cancer? Breast Cancer Res Treat 131(3) 819–25 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-011-1486-2
8. Giuliano AE, McCall L, Beitsch P, et al (2010) Locoregional recurrence after sentinel node dissection with or without axillary dissection in patients with sentinel lymph node metastases: the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 randomized trial Ann Surg 252(3) 426–32 PMID: 20739842
9. Giuliano AE, et al (2011) Axillary dissection vs no axillary dissection in women with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis: a randomized clinical trial JAMA 305(6) 569–75 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2011.90 PMID: 21304082
10. DeCicco C, Cremonesi M, Luini A, Bartolomei M, Grana C, Prisco G, Galimberti V, Calza P, Viale G, Veronesi U and Paganelli G (1998) Lymphoscintigraphy and radioguided biopsy of the sentinel axillary node in breast cancer J Nucl Med 39 2080–4 PMID: 9867145
12. Turner RR, Ollila DW, Krasne DL and Giuliano AE (1997) Histopathologic validation of the sentinel lymph node hypothesis for breast cancer Ann Surg 226(3) 271–8 DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199709000-00006 PMID: 9339933 PMCID: 1191021
13. Veronesi U, Paganelli G, Galimberti V, et al (1997) Sentinel node biopsy to avoid axillary dissection in breast cancer with clinically negative lymph nodes Lancet 349(9069) 1864–7 DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)01004-0 PMID: 9217757
14. Sandrucci S and Mussa A (1998) Sentinel node biopsy and axillary staging of T1-T2 N0 breast cancer; a multicenter study Semin Surg Oncol 15(4) 278–83 DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2388(199812)15:4<278::AID-SSU18>3.0.CO;2-9 PMID: 9829387
15. Viale G, Bosari S, Mazzarol G, et al (1999) Intraoperative examination of axillary sentinel lymph nodes in breast carcinoma patients Cancer 85(11) 2433–8 DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19990601)85:11<2433::AID-CNCR18>3.0.CO;2-3 PMID: 10357414
16. Giuliano AE, Kirgan DM, Guenther JM and Morton DL (1994) Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy for breast cancer Ann Surg 220(3) 391–401 DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199409000-00015 PMID: 8092905 PMCID: 1234400
17. Canavese G, Gipponi M, Catturich A, et al (1998) Sentinel lymph node mapping open a new perspective in the surgical management of early stage breast cancer: a combined approach with vital blue dye lymphatic mapping and radioguided surgery Semin Surg Oncol 15(4) 272–7 DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2388(199812)15:4<272::AID-SSU17>3.0.CO;2-I PMID: 9829386
18. D’Eredita G, Giardina C, Guerreri AM and Berardi T (2006) A further validation of subareolar injection technique for breast sentinel lymph node biopsy Ann Surg Oncol 13(5) 701–7 DOI: 10.1245/ASO.2006.04.027
20. Albertini JJ, Lyman GH, Cox CE, Yeatman T, Balducci L, Ku N, et al (1996) Lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy in the patient with breast cancer JAMA 276(22) 1818–22 DOI: 10.1001/jama.1996.03540220042028 PMID: 8946902
21. Cody HS, 3rd, Fey J, Akhurst T, et al (2001) Complementarity of dye and isotope in sentinel node localization for breast cancer. Univariate and multivariate analysis of 966 procedures Ann Surg Oncol 8(1) 13–9 DOI: 10.1007/s10434-001-0013-9 PMID: 11206218
22. Olson JA, Fey J, Winawer J, et al (2000) Sentinel lymphadenectomy accurately predicts nodal status in T2 breast cancer J Am Coll Surg 191(6) 593–9 DOI: 10.1016/S1072-7515(00)00732-8 PMID: 11129806
23. McCarter MD, Yeung H, Yeh S, Fey J, Borgen PI and Cody III HS (2001) Localization of the sentinel node in breast cancer: identical results with same day and day before isotope injection Ann Surg Oncol 8(8) 682–6 DOI: 10.1007/s10434-001-0682-4 PMID: 11569785
24. Canavese G, Gipponi M, Catturich A, et al (2001) Technical issues and pathologic complications of sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage breast cancer patients J Surg Oncol 77(2) 81–7 DOI: 10.1002/jso.1074 PMID: 11398158
25. Krag DN, Weavr DL, Alex JC and Fairbank JT (1993) Surgical resection and radiolocalization of the sentinel lymph node in breast cancer using a gamma probe Surg Oncol 2(6) 335–9 DOI: 10.1016/0960-7404(93)90064-6 PMID: 8130940
26. Veronesi U, Paganelli G, Viale G, et al (1999) Sentinel lymph node biopsy and axillary dissection in breast cancer: results in a large series J Natl Cancer Inst 91(4) 368–73 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/91.4.368 PMID: 10050871
27. Lyman GH, Giuliano AE, Somerfield MR, et al (2005) American Society of Clinical Oncology guideline recommendations for sentinel lymph node biopsy in early breast cancer J Clin Oncol 23(30) 7703–20 DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.08.001 PMID: 16157938
28. Carter CL, Allen C and Henso DE (1989) Relation of tumor size, lymph node status and survival in 24.740 breast cancer cases Cancer 63(1) 181–7 DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19890101)63:1<181::AID-CNCR2820630129>3.0.CO;2-H PMID: 2910416
29. Lee AK, DeLellis RA, Silverman ML, Heatley GJ and Wolfe HJ (1990) Prognostic significance of peritumoral lymphatic and blood vessel invasion in node negative carcinoma of the breast J Clin Oncol 8(9) 1457–65 PMID: 2202788