Collision tumour of large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma and adenocarcinoma in the stomach: A case report
Eduardo Payet1, Pau I Pilco2, Jaime Montes1, Alejandra Cordero-Morales3, Maria Jose Savitzky3 and Karoline Stenning-Persivale3
1Clínica Anglo Americana, Calle Alfredo Salazar S/N, San Isidro, Lima 18, Peru
2Clínica Delgado, Avenida Angamos Oesta cuadra 4, Miraflores, Lima 27, Peru
3Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas, Prolongación Primavera 2390, Santiago de Surco, Lima 33, Peru
Correspondence to: Alejandra Cordero-Morales. Email: ale.cordero43@gmail.com
Abstract
Concurrence of adenocarcinoma and large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the stomach is a rare condition. Here, we report a case of gastric collision tumour with large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma and adenocarcinoma. A 71-year-old Peruvian man presented with nausea, epigastric pain, and weight loss for seven months. An Endoscopic evaluation revealed a huge ulcerative and infiltrative mass in the upper and middle third of the stomach. The patient underwent a D2 total gastrectomy. Microscopically, two separated and attached ulcerative lesions were recognised. The proximal to the cardial lesion showed neuroendocrine morphology and immunoreactivity for synaptophysin, and the other a moderated tubular adenocarcinoma Borrmann type III. Both lesions invaded serosa and lymph nodes metastases were found in 17 of 41 lymph nodes retrieved (one lymph node with neuroendocrine metastatic deposits).
Keywords: collision tumour, carcinoma, neuroendocrine, adenocarcinoma
Copyright: © the authors; licensee ecancermedicalscience. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Published: 29/01/2016; Received: 23/10/2015
Introduction
Adenocarcinomas are largely the most common gastric malignant tumour and concurrent or synchronous presentation in the same stomach of different histological type tumours rarely occurs. Lewin proposed a nomenclature for these neoplasms: (a) Composite tumours for the mixture of exocrine and endocrine components; (b) Collision tumours, where the exocrine and endocrine components differ and are juxtaposed and finally; (c) Amphicrine cell tumours, where the endocrine and exocrine cells constituents are present within the same cell, exhibiting dual differentiation [1, 2].
Collision tumours are neoplasms consisting of two distinct cell populations, developing in juxtaposition to one another, without areas of intermingling [3]. These types of tumours are believed to arise independently from a multipotential epithelial stem cell or a primitive neuroendocrine carcinoma, respectively, and it is coincidental that they exist next to each other [2, 4]. Here, we present a rare case of a gastric collision tumour displaying features of both large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) and adenocarcinoma.
Case report
A 71-year-old man was admitted to our outpatient clinic, with nausea, epigastric pain, and weight loss that had lasted for seven months. Laboratory findings showed anaemia. The patient underwent an endoscopic evaluation, which revealed a huge ulcerative and infiltrative mass in the upper and middle third of the stomach and the biopsy specimen taken showed a moderated tubular adenocarcinoma. Contrast-enhanced computerised tomography (CT) scan revealed a thick engrossment of the two upper thirds of the stomach with enlarged perigastric lymph nodes and not liver, nor peritoneal metastases findings were shown. The patient underwent a D2 total gastrectomy with distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy. At surgery, the tumour was located in the upper two-thirds of the posterior wall of the stomach with enlarged lymph nodes at the lesser curvature and celiac trunk. There was serosal invasion and fixation to the anterior surface of the pancreas body. No liver or peritoneal metastases were found.
On gross examination of the specimen, we identified two attached ulcerative tumours located on the posterior wall of the stomach (Figure 1). The proximal one close to the cardial region measured 6.5 × 5.5 cm, with a whitish grey coloration and with an elastic consistency; and closely attached, a fungating ulcerative reddish lesion (Borrmann type III) measured 8.5 × 8.0 cm and occupied the posterior surface of the middle third of the stomach. The latter fixedly attached to the anterior surface of the body of the pancreas. The spleen did not show alterations. In addition to the gastric specimen, 41 resected regional lymph nodes were submitted and studied. Microscopically, two separated gastric lesions were identified with different patterns in morphology and the distance in between was of 1 mm (Figure 2). The proximal lesion corresponds to a large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma composed of atypical cells with faint cytoplasmic features and prominent hyperchromatic nuclei (occasionally pleomorphic). The cells are distributed in an organoid architecture with solid nests and broad trabeculae solid pattern without glandular formation (Figure 3A). The distal tumour corresponds to a moderated tubular adenocarcinoma, composed mainly of tubules infiltrating the gastric wall with serosal exposure. The cells contain variable amounts of eosinophilic cytoplasm with scattered mucin material (Figure 3B).
Figure 1. Resected specimen showing two attached ulcerative lesions in the posterior surface of the proximal and middle third of the stomach.
Figure 2. Two separated lesions showing both neuroendocrine carcinoma and tubular adenocarcinoma at H & E.
Figure 3. A) Neuroendocrine carcinoma (H & E), B) Moderated tubular adenocarcinoma (H & E), C) Tumour cells with neuroendocrine histology showing cytoplasmic inmunoreactivity for synaptophysin, D) Tumour cells with neuroendocrine morphology showing focal cytoplasmic inmunoreactivity to pankeratin.
The neuroendocrine phenotype of the large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma was immunohistochemically confirmed with synaptophysin, which stain all (Figure 3C). Additionally, it showed focal expression for keratin (AE1/AE3) (Figure 3D). Other markers, such us CD45, CD3, CD20, CD30, and S100, were negative.
The tumour cells invaded veins as well as lymphatic nodes. Regional lymph node metastasis was detected in 17 out of 41 lymph nodes. Sections showed adenocarcinoma in all lymph nodes retrieved, but only one lymph node showed metastasis from the neuroendocrine carcinoma.
Discussion
Gastric large-cell neuroendocrine carcinomas (LCNECs) are a rare type of tumours that account for less than 1.5% of all types of gastric cancers and have a very poor prognosis [5, 6]. These are tumours identified by immunohistochemistry and electron microscopy due to its distinguishing features that indicates endocrine differentiation. Due to the low frequency of presentation, these tumours have not been well described [7].
On the other hand, adenocarcinomas account to up to 95% of all malignancies found in the stomach and are by far the most studied type of gastric tumour [8]. It is known that adenocarcinomas can frequently have a mixed composition with minor endocrine components inside the tumour; that is why the identification of a LNEC in addition to the original adenocarcinoma demonstrates the presence of two different tumours coexisting, instead of the initial thought of a poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma [9].
The prognosis of the patient will be determined by the aggressiveness and extension of the tumour with deeper invasion of the gastric wall and the proportion of lymph node metastases. In this case, the most aggressive lesion was the adenocarcinoma, which showed serosal exposure and great proportion of lymph node metastases. This tumour was classified as a stage IIIC, using the criteria established by the American Joint Commission on Cancer (TNM), indicating that surgery was the first choice of treatment [9]. The case was discussed with the patient, offering him the possibility of postoperative radiochemotherapy. However, the patient refused this option and he was given only palliative care.
Conclusion
To our knowledge, there are fewer than 40 cases of reported collision tumours with the characteristics given [11, 12]. These types of tumours are rare entities diagnosed after surgery, with the use of pathology studies. Collision tumours are described as mixed tumours, which presents with two different cell populations that appear to arise as separate lesions juxtaposed to one another [10].
Ethical statements
All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1964 and later versions. Informed consent or substitute for it was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
References
1. Lewin K (1987) Carcinoid tumors and the mixed (composite) glandular-endocrine cell carcinomas Am J Surg Pathol 11 (Suppl 1) 71–86 DOI: 10.1097/00000478-198700111-00007 PMID: 3544888
2. Lee JH, Kim HW and Kang DH et al (2013) A gastric composite tumor with an adenocarcinoma and a neuroendocrine carcinoma: a case report Clin Endosc 46(3) 280–3 DOI: 10.5946/ce.2013.46.3.280 PMID: 23767040 PMCID: 3678067
3. Michalinos A, Constantinidou A and Kontos M (2015) Gastric collision tumors: an insight into their origin and clinical significance Gastroenterol Res Pract 2015 314158 DOI: 10.1155/2015/314158 PMID: 25767509 PMCID: 4342179
4. Fukui H, Takada M and Chiba T et al (2001) Concurrent occurrence of gastric adenocarcinoma and duodenal neuroendocrine cell carcinoma: a composite tumour or collision tumours? Gut 48 853–6 DOI: 10.1136/gut.48.6.853 PMID: 11358908 PMCID: 1728320
5. Qian T, Gao F and Chen MZ et al (2014) Collision tumor of the esophagus: report of a case with mixed squamous cell carcinoma and gastrointestinal stromal tumor Int J Clin Exp Pathol 7(3) 1206–11 PMID: 24695797 PMCID: 3971329
6. Terada T and Maruo H (2011) Simultaneous large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the stomach World J Gastroenterol 17(43) 4831–4 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i43.4831 PMID: 22147986 PMCID: 3229634
7. Jiang SX, Mikami T and Umezawa A et al (2006) Gastric large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas: a distinct clinicopathologic entity Am J Surg Pathol 30 945–53 DOI: 10.1097/00000478-200608000-00003 PMID: 16861964
8. Rustagi T and Alekshun TJ (2010) Gastric large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma Gastrointest Cancer Res (Suppl 1) S30
9. Hamilton SR and Aaltonen LA (2000) Pathology and genetics of tumours of the digestive system IARC
10. Dicken BJ, Bigam DL and Cass C et al (2005) Gastric adenocarcinoma: review and considerations for future directions Ann Surg 241(1) 27–39
11. Gurzu S, Kadar Z and Bara T et al Mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma of gastrointestinal tract: report of two cases World J Gastroenterol 21(4) 1329–33
12. Levi Sandri GB, Carboni F and Valle M et al (2014) Mixed adenoneuroendocrine gastric carcinoma: a case report and review of the literature J Gastric Cancer 14(1) 63–66 DOI: 10.5230/jgc.2014.14.1.63 PMID: 24765540 PMCID: 3996252
