ecancermedicalscience

Research

The impact of the Oncotype DX Recurrence Score on treatment decisions and clinical outcomes in patients with early breast cancer: the Maccabi Healthcare Services experience with a unified testing policy

17 Dec 2013
Nava Siegelmann-Danieli, Barbara Silverman, Aviad Zick, Anat Beit-Or, Itzhak Katzir, Avi Porath

The Oncotype DX Recurrence Score is a validated prognosticator in oestrogen receptor positive (ER ) breast cancer. Our retrospective analysis of a prospectively defined cohort summarises the clinical implications associated with Oncotype DX testing according to the Maccabi Healthcare Services (MHS) policy. The MHS eligibility criteria for testing included ER N0/pN1mic invasive tumours, discussion of test implications with an oncologist, ductal carcinoma 0.6–1 cm Grade 2–3, HER2 negative ductal carcinomas with 1.1–4.0 cm Grade 1–2, or lobular carcinoma. Large (> 1 cm) Grade 3 tumours could have grade reassessed. We linked Recurrence Score results with patients’ information and used chi-squared tests to assess the associations thereof. Between January 2008 and December 2011, tests were performed on 751 patients (MHS-eligible, 713); 54%, 38%, and 8% of patients had low, intermediate, and high Recurrence Score results, respectively. Recurrence Score distribution varied significantly with age (P = 0.002), with increasing Recurrence Score values with decreasing age. The proportion of patients with high Recurrence Score results varied by grade/size combination and histology, occurring in 32% of small (≤ 1 cm) Grade 3 and 3% of larger (1.1–4 cm) Grade 1 ductal tumours and only in 2% of lobular carcinomas. Chemotherapy was administered to 1%, 13%, and 61% of patients with low, intermediate, and high Recurrence Score results, respectively (P < 0.0001), but only to 2% of intermediate score patients ≥ 65 years. Luteinising-hormone-releasing hormone agonists with tamoxifen were used in 27% of low Recurrence Score patients ≤ 50 years. With a median follow-up of 26 months, no systemic recurrences were documented, whereas four patients exhibited locoregional recurrences. In summary, in this low-to-moderate risk patient population, testing identified 46% of patients as intermediate/high risk. Treatment decisions were influenced by Recurrence Score results and patients’ age. The current MHS policy seems to achieve the goal of promoting chemotherapy use according to the test results in a prespecified patient population.

Related Articles

Nikhil Bathija, Rohit Mahajan, Anil Kumar Goel, Siva Ranjani, Mounika Sirimalla, Gourav Kaushal, Sapna Marcus, Shilpa Jain, Madhur Verma, Deep Shikha, Korukonda Vinod Kumar, Jyoti Sharma
Pavan Raju Kola, Amith Paruchuri, Nimisha Preman, Hemavathi Baskarane, Vishakha Hooda, Aparna Sharma, Ishaan Gupta, Saran Kumar, Shilpi Minocha, Pranay Tanwar, Mohit Kumar Divakar, Atul Batra
Loreto Fernández-González, Rodrigo Lagos, Piero Bettoli, Loreto Moreira, Jaime Sapag, David Kissane
Pablo Companys, Tomas Soule, Mariano Aymar, María Natalia Gandur Quiroga, Rosalía Hinojosa Altamirano, Marcelo Fogtman, Augusto Ferreyra Camacho, Rodrigo Sánchez, Gonzalo Taetti, Gabriela Gatica, Natalia Soto, María Elisa Arroyo, Nicolas Mainardi, Carolina Passarella, Andrea Marchioni, Ignacio Jerez, María Pía Domínguez, Emiliano Menna, Harold Somerville, Ernesto Korbenfeld, Florencia Sarru, Karina Peters, Iván Macharashvili, Federico Losco, Laura Pelagatti Santoni, Mauricio Fernández Lazaro, José Zarba, Mabel Gill, Juan Pablo Sade, Federico Cayol
Gbenro E. Olukiran, Adewumi O. Alabi, Anthonia C. Sowunmi, Babatunde Fadipe, Gbenga O. Popoola, Sunday A. Okinbaloye, Hnin L. Nwe Thein, Ololade Kehinde