ecancermedicalscience

Research

Comprehensive genomic profiling in metastatic solid tumours: high actionability but low implementation in real-world practice

1 Sep 2026
Moushumi Suryavanshi, Prashant Mehta, Manoj Kumar, Saphalta Bhagmar, Vidit Kapoor, Dushyant Kumar, Sweta Mishra, Bhawna Chauhan

Background: Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) identifies actionable alterations in two-thirds of metastatic solid tumours, yet real-world treatment implementation remains unknown. We characterised both genomic yield and clinical translation barriers in 111 consecutive patients across 19 tumour types to quantify the precision oncology ‘knowing-doing gap’.

Methods: Out of 114 patients who were initially enrolled in the study, we performed retrospective analysis of 111 consecutive metastatic patients across 19 tumour types, after quality control exclusion, undergoing CGP using the Oncomine Comprehensive Assay Plus (517 genes). Genomic instability was assessed via the genomic instability metric (GIM); actionable alterations were tiered per Association for Molecular Pathology/American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guidelines. Treatment implementation and clinical outcomes were tracked through October 2024 (median follow-up 11.2 months).

Results: Oncogenic alterations were detected in 109 of 111 patients (98.2%), with actionable findings in 72 patients (64.9%: Tier 1 = 32 and Tier 2 = 40). All GIM-high tumours (10/10) harboured homologous recombination repair (HRR) gene alterations. Critically, BRCA1/2 mutations were significantly enriched in GIM-high tumours (50% versus 12%, p = 0.008), whereas non-BRCA HRR genes (ATM, CHEK2, PALB2 and RAD51C/D) showed no association (50% versus 60.6%, p = 0.838). Despite 64.9% actionability, only 10 patients (13.9%) received tier-matched therapy – an 86% attrition rate attributable to clinical deterioration (22%), drug inaccessibility (19%) and financial toxicity (15%). Presumed germline variants were detected in 16.2% but confirmed in only 38.9%. Pharmacogenomic variants guided dose modifications in 29.7% of patients.

Conclusion: CGP demonstrates high diagnostic yield (98.2%) with actionable findings in two-thirds of pan-cancer patients. The differential BRCA1/2-specific association with genomic instability refines homologous recombination deficiency biology for multi-tumour Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor selection. An 86% attrition rate from genomic recommendation to treatment underscores urgent need for infrastructure improvements, including clinical trial access, pharmacogenomic integration and earlier CGP adoption.

Related Articles

Ashutosh Mishra, Amit Kumar, Ajay Gogia, Chinmay Bagla, Gajendra Pandit, Jyoti Sharma, Jyoutishman Saikia, Rohan Kapoor, D N Sharma, Atul Batra, Surendra Saini, Supriya Mallick, Nishkarsh Gupta, Brajesh Ratre, Ruchi Rathore, Sandeep Mathur, Sunil Kumar, Suryanarayana Deo
Patricia N Apenteng, Larry Akoko, Vihar Kotecha, Theresia Mwakyembe, Masumbuko Mwashambwa, Rukia Himid, Deo Hando, Charles Komba, Ally Mwanga, Peter Mbele, Paul Itule, Joshua Jackson, Mungeni Misidai, Cameron Gaskill, Doruk Ozgediz, Nathan Brand
Imad Barjij, Sarah Naciri, Sihame Lkhoyaali, Saoussane Kharmoum, Hanane Inrhaouen, Ibrahim Elghissassi, Saber Boutayeb, Hind Mrabti, Hassan Errihani
Mariam Hina, Bilal Mazhar Qureshi, Habiba Zaheer, Bilal Ahmed, Maham Khan, Laraib Khan, Tooba Ali, Fabiha Shakeel, Jawad Ahmad, Muhammad Abdul Wasay Zuberi, Maria Tariq, Nasir Ali, Asim Hafiz, Ahmed Nadeem Abbasi
Maria Lucila González Donna, Eliza Ramirez Cabrera, Andrea Magali del Valle Ochelli, Lucia Ayala Albertini, Lucas Coradini, Verónica Alejandra Livieres Alayón, Iván Garrigoza Garcete, Cinthia Gauna Colas, Maria Luisa Cabañas León, Jabibi Noguera, Gladys Estigarribia, Alejandro Frydman, Carlos Palmes, Santiago Leguizamon, Matias Rodrigo Chacon, Federico Waisberg