ecancermedicalscience

Research

Volume-replacement oncoplastic surgery using chest wall perforator flaps without Doppler mapping: surgical and patient-reported outcomes from a high-volume tertiary cancer centre in India

1 Sep 2026
Ashutosh Mishra, Amit Kumar, Ajay Gogia, Chinmay Bagla, Gajendra Pandit, Jyoti Sharma, Jyoutishman Saikia, Rohan Kapoor, D N Sharma, Atul Batra, Surendra Saini, Supriya Mallick, Nishkarsh Gupta, Brajesh Ratre, Ruchi Rathore, Sandeep Mathur, Sunil Kumar, Suryanarayana Deo

Background: Oncoplastic breast surgery seeks to preserve aesthetic outcomes without compromising oncological safety. Various flap techniques based on tumour location exist, yet limited evidence exists evaluating perforator-based oncoplastic breast reconstruction. This study evaluates surgical and patient-reported outcomes of partial breast reconstruction using chest wall perforator flaps (CWPFs) without Doppler assistance.

Methods: The study included 137 patients who underwent CWPFs post-January 2020 and completed 1 year of follow-up before April 2025. Data were analysed from a prospectively maintained database, recording demographics, perioperative events and surgical outcomes. Patient satisfaction was assessed with the BREAST-QTM questionnaire six months after radiotherapy completion.

Results: The mean age of the study population was 48.1 years. Lateral intercostal artery perforator, medial intercostal artery perforator and anterior intercostal artery perforator were performed in 59.1%, 28.5%, and 12.4%, respectively. Mean operative time for flap harvesting and insetting was 41, 23 and 25 minutes, respectively. Postoperative complications, graded using the Clavien–Dindo classification, included minor wound dehiscence (9.49%), marginal flap necrosis (2.91%), seroma (2.18%) and hematoma (0.72%). Adjuvant radiation therapy was completed by 97.08% of patients. The BREAST-QTM questionnaire, answered by 113 patients (82.4%), revealed the highest satisfaction scores for breast surgeon, medical team and office staff (median interquartile range (IQR) of 100 (0)), while sexual well-being scored lowest (median (IQR) of 72 (46)).

Conclusion: No-Doppler CWPFs offer a simple, reliable and safe solution for partial breast reconstruction, delivering high patient satisfaction without reliance on specialised imaging. This muscle-sparing, cost-effective approach reinforces the importance of anatomical precision over technology, making it a valuable addition to oncoplastic practice in diverse healthcare environments.

Related Articles

Matías A Atencio, Elías J Ortega Chahla, Mirko Vidic, Candela V Giuffré, Mickaela Echavarría Demichelis, Joaquín A Luini, Franco E Espinoza, Ana M Rosas, María Cruz Germain, Abril Montani, Iñaki M Dopazo Danieli, Joel A Schernenco, Lucas G Durán, María E Esandi
Ravikant Singh, Atul Budukh Suvarna Kolekar, Gaurav Kumar, Burhanuddin Qayyumi, Tulika Gupta, Zikki Hassan Fatima, Narpat Padvi, Samyukta Shivashankar, Alisha Shah, Deepak Gupta, Nishant Kumar, Kumar Prabhash
M T Maria Tereza Nieto-Coronel, Daniela Shveid Gerson, Gian Karla Urey Cuellar, Navia-Bueno Ma Pilar, Maribel Marmol Casas