ecancermedicalscience

Research

Validation of the comprehensive score for financial toxicity for Brazilian culture

18 Dec 2020
Luciana de Alcantara Nogueira, Francisco José Koller, Larissa Marcondes, Maria de Fátima Mantovani, Sonia Silva Marcon, Paulo Ricardo Bittencourt Guimarães, Luciana Puchalski Kalinke

Financial toxicity is a side effect of cancer treatment showing the financial burden experienced by cancer patients for funding their treatment. An instrument for its evaluation can contribute towards the creation of coping strategies. In Brazil, a developing country, cancer patients certainly feel the effects of this serious adverse event, however, the discussion on the theme and research concerning these issues is scarce and an instrument for evaluation can help in the promotion of coping strategies. Thus, the study objective was to: 1) translate and adapt the COmprehensive Score for financial Toxicity (COST) questionnaire to Brazilian culture and 2) evaluate the COST psychometric properties in Brazil. Thus, a methodological study was developed in two stages. In the first stage, the translation and cross-cultural adaptation were performed, and in the second stage, two groups of participants were recruited to evaluate the psychometric properties. In the first stage, 21 individuals participated, including translators and cancer patients, and in the second stage, 126 patients participated who were undergoing cancer treatment. For validation, exploratory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and Cronbach’s alpha coefficient were performed to verify internal consistency. For the first stage’s outcome, the pre-test Cronbach’s alpha was 0.83. The EFA and CFA carried out in the second stage of the study revealed that the COST Brazilian version measures a single construct with a value of—χ2/gl = 179.78, comparative fit index = 0.00, Parsimony goodness of fit index = 0.302, root mean square error of approximation = 1.196 and p-value of close fit = 0.000. When comparing the average of the COST score and the standard deviation of the two samples, the significance value was p = 0.001. Therefore, it is possible to confirm that the COST is a valid and reliable questionnaire to measure the financial toxicity of cancer patients in Brazil.

Related Articles

Natalia Camejo, Camila Montenegro, Dahiana Amarillo, Cecilia Castillo, Gabriel Krygier
Gonzalo Javier Ziegler-Rodriguez, Miguel Ángel Pinillos Portella, Gabriel De la Cruz Ku, Sheila Eunice Vílchez Santillan, Jorge Dunstan Yataco, José Antonio Galarreta Zegarra, Gabriela Calderón Valencia, José Manuel Cotrina Concha
Norma Dewi Suryani, Juan Adrian Wiranata, Herindita Puspitaningtyas, Susanna Hilda Hutajulu, Yayi Suryo Prabandari, Adeodatus Yuda Handaya, Mardiah Suci Hardianti, Kartika Widayati Taroeno-Hariadi, Johan Kurnianda, Ibnu Purwanto
Ishika Mahajan, Amogh Kadam, Lucy McCann, Aruni Ghose, Katie Wakeham, Navjot Singh Dhillon, Susannah Stanway, Stergios Boussios, Soirindhri Banerjee, Ashwini Priyadarshini, Bhawna Sirohi, Julie S Torode, Swarupa Mitra
Misbah Younus Soomro, Saqib Raza Khan, Hashim Ishfaq, Insia Ali, Mirza Rameez Samar, Arif Hameed, Nawazish Zehra, Munira Moosajee, Yasmin Abdul Rashid
Ghazal Tansir, Sameer Rastogi, Ekta Dhamija, Shamim Ahmed Shamim, Deepali Jain, Adarsh Barwad, Sunil Kumar, Rambha Pandey