ecancermedicalscience

Review

The presence of secondary circulating prostate tumour cells determines the risk of biochemical relapse for patients with low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer who are treated only with external radiotherapy

20 Jun 2018
Nigel P Murray, Sócrates Aedo, Cynthia Fuentealba, Eduardo Reyes, Simone Minzer, Aníbal Salazar

Introduction: The classification of patients with prostate cancer is used to determine treatments based on risk factors. The presence of secondary circulating prostate tumour cells (CPCs) detected in peripheral blood after a curative treatment has been associated with a worse prognosis. We present a prospective study of CPC detection post radiotherapy and the oncological results.

Patients and methods: All of the patients classified as low and intermediate risk that were treated with radiotherapy were included. Three months after finishing treatment, an 8-ml blood sample was taken to detect CPCs. Mononuclear cells were obtained using gel centrifugation, and CPCs were identified using immunocytochemistry with anti-prostate-specific antigen. Patients were classified as low-risk CPC positive or negative and intermediate-risk CPC positive or negative. The biochemical relapse-free survival analysis was determined based on a follow-up of up to 15 years using the Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression models. Biochemical failure was defined according to the Pheonix II criteria.

Results: Of 241 patients, 181 (75.1%) were classified as low risk and 60 (24.9%) as intermediate risk. Biochemical failure was observed in 27.1% (49/181) of the low-risk prostate cancer participants and in 53.3% (32/60) of intermediate-risk participants after 15 years of follow-up. 20.4% (37/181) of the low-risk cancer participants had detectable CPCs in comparison with 43.3% (26/60) of the intermediate-risk cancer participants (p < 0.001 overall risk 2.98, confidence interval (CI) 95% 1.59–5.56; relative risk 2.12, CI 95% 1.41–3.19). Positive CPC patients had a worse prognosis, and a shorter time period until biochemical relapse, regardless of risk group. The biochemical relapse-free survival curves show that intermediate-risk participants who were CPC negative had a higher survival rate and slower disease progression than those participants who were low risk but CPC positive.

Conclusions: CPC detection is a risk factor for biochemical relapse and could be useful in identifying patients that will need additional treatment.

Related Articles

Pablo Companys, Tomas Soule, Mariano Aymar, María Natalia Gandur Quiroga, Rosalía Hinojosa Altamirano, Marcelo Fogtman, Augusto Ferreyra Camacho, Rodrigo Sánchez, Gonzalo Taetti, Gabriela Gatica, Natalia Soto, María Elisa Arroyo, Nicolas Mainardi, Carolina Passarella, Andrea Marchioni, Ignacio Jerez, María Pía Domínguez, Emiliano Menna, Harold Somerville, Ernesto Korbenfeld, Florencia Sarru, Karina Peters, Iván Macharashvili, Federico Losco, Laura Pelagatti Santoni, Mauricio Fernández Lazaro, José Zarba, Mabel Gill, Juan Pablo Sade, Federico Cayol
Leonardo G Da Fonseca, Duilio Reis da Rocha Filho, Aline Lopes Chagas, Alexandre Jacome, Leila Moreira Beltrao Pereira, Rogerio Alves, Mario Reis Alvares-da-Silva, Mauro Donadio, Ana Paula Victorino, Federico Piñero, Cassia Guedes Leal
Imad Barjij, Sarah Naciri, Sihame Lkhoyaali, Saoussane Kharmoum, Hanane Inrhaouen, Ibrahim Elghissassi, Saber Boutayeb, Hind Mrabti, Hassan Errihani
Moushumi Suryavanshi, Prashant Mehta, Manoj Kumar, Saphalta Bhagmar, Vidit Kapoor, Dushyant Kumar, Sweta Mishra, Bhawna Chauhan