ecancermedicalscience

Review

The presence of secondary circulating prostate tumour cells determines the risk of biochemical relapse for patients with low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer who are treated only with external radiotherapy

20 Jun 2018
Nigel P Murray, Sócrates Aedo, Cynthia Fuentealba, Eduardo Reyes, Simone Minzer, Aníbal Salazar

Introduction: The classification of patients with prostate cancer is used to determine treatments based on risk factors. The presence of secondary circulating prostate tumour cells (CPCs) detected in peripheral blood after a curative treatment has been associated with a worse prognosis. We present a prospective study of CPC detection post radiotherapy and the oncological results.

Patients and methods: All of the patients classified as low and intermediate risk that were treated with radiotherapy were included. Three months after finishing treatment, an 8-ml blood sample was taken to detect CPCs. Mononuclear cells were obtained using gel centrifugation, and CPCs were identified using immunocytochemistry with anti-prostate-specific antigen. Patients were classified as low-risk CPC positive or negative and intermediate-risk CPC positive or negative. The biochemical relapse-free survival analysis was determined based on a follow-up of up to 15 years using the Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression models. Biochemical failure was defined according to the Pheonix II criteria.

Results: Of 241 patients, 181 (75.1%) were classified as low risk and 60 (24.9%) as intermediate risk. Biochemical failure was observed in 27.1% (49/181) of the low-risk prostate cancer participants and in 53.3% (32/60) of intermediate-risk participants after 15 years of follow-up. 20.4% (37/181) of the low-risk cancer participants had detectable CPCs in comparison with 43.3% (26/60) of the intermediate-risk cancer participants (p < 0.001 overall risk 2.98, confidence interval (CI) 95% 1.59–5.56; relative risk 2.12, CI 95% 1.41–3.19). Positive CPC patients had a worse prognosis, and a shorter time period until biochemical relapse, regardless of risk group. The biochemical relapse-free survival curves show that intermediate-risk participants who were CPC negative had a higher survival rate and slower disease progression than those participants who were low risk but CPC positive.

Conclusions: CPC detection is a risk factor for biochemical relapse and could be useful in identifying patients that will need additional treatment.

Related Articles

Sofia Ali Syed, Muhammad Asif Qureshi, Saeed Khan, Rajesh Kumar, Yusra Shafique, Bilal Ahmed Khan, Jawad Safdar
Amit Joshi, Devanshi Kalra, Vijai Simha, Nandini Menon, Vanita Noronha, Ganesh Bakshi, Gagan Prakash, Mahendra Pal, Vedang Murthy, Santosh Menon, Nilesh Sable, Archi Agrawal, Pallavi Rane, Kumar Prabhash
Beatriz de Jesus Brait, Simone Perpétua da Silva Lima, Franciana Luísa Aguiar, Rafael Fernandes-Ferreira, Camila Ive Ferreira Oliveira-Brancati, Joyce Aparecida Martins Lopes Ferraz, Graciela Domitila Tenani, Marcela Augusta de Souza Pinhel, Leticia Carolina Paraboli Assoni, Augusto Haniu Nakahara, Natalia dos Santos Jábali, Octavio Pennella Fenelon Costa, Maria Eduarda Lopes Baitello, Sidney Pinheiro Júnior, Renato Ferreira Silva, Rita de Cássia Martins Alves Silva, Doroteia Rossi da Silva Souza
Paromita Roy, Lateef Zameer, Debdeep Dey, Jayati Datta, Anand Bardia, Deepak Mishra
S Gandini, PF Ferrucci, H Johanson, B Bonanni, A Testori