ecancermedicalscience

Review

Conducting Phase IV clinical studies: a moral imperative?

26 Oct 2012
TP Hill

The answer to this question lies in knowing the moral standing of Phase IV studies and whether we ought to conduct them. And to know this, in part, we need to compare them to studies in Phases I, II, and III and then determine where Phase IV studies stand in relation to Phase I–III studies scientifically and commercially.

Related Articles

Adewale Isaiah Oyewole, Funmilola Olanike Wuraola, Amir H Sohail, Titilope Ogunniyi, Chinyere Nwankwo, Zainab Oyindamola Adegbite, Dorcas Olaide Ebekue, Clement D Awe, Elizabeth N Christian, Kristina Diaz, Oluwasegun Afolaranmi, Clara N Lambert, Dan Sherman, George Gutierrez, Chinenye Iwuji, Juliet S Lumati
Ally H Mwanga, Jeanine Justiniano, Eric M Mbuguje, Balowa Musa, Deogratius B Mwanakulya, Andrew Swallow, Edith Kimambo, Eva Uiso, Swaleh Pazi, Latifa Rajab, Nashivai E Kivuyo, Larry Akoko, Azza Naif, Advera Ngaiza, Sara Nyagabona, Jerry Ndumbalo, Amos R Mwakigonja, Jim E Littlejohn, Seif Wibonela, Cameron E Gaskill
Rodrigo Lastra, Patricia Iranzo, Javier-David Benítez-Fuentes, Ana Callejo, Mara Cruellas, Jacobo Gómez Ulla, Isabel Pimentel, José Luis Pérez-Gracia, Marta Ramos, Francisco Gil Moncayo, María Álvarez Alejandro, Marta Gascón, Sergio Martínez Recio, Pilar Rivero, Jorge Bartolomé, Antonio David Lázaro Sánchez, David Fernández Garay, Alicia de Luna Aguilar, Isabel Lorenzo Lorenzo, Joan Brunet, Noemi Reguart, Dario Trapani
Kamlesh M Bhojwani, Ahmed Raheem, Urooba Tariq Khan, Fahad Javid, Daniyal Tanweer, Nawal Rehmani, Nadeem Ullah Khan, Saqib Raza Khan