ecancermedicalscience

Review

Conducting Phase IV clinical studies: a moral imperative?

26 Oct 2012
TP Hill

The answer to this question lies in knowing the moral standing of Phase IV studies and whether we ought to conduct them. And to know this, in part, we need to compare them to studies in Phases I, II, and III and then determine where Phase IV studies stand in relation to Phase I–III studies scientifically and commercially.

Related Articles

Nuradh Joseph, Vimukthini Peiris, Vodathi Bamunuarachchi, Prasad Abeysinghe, Nadarajah Jeyakumaran, Devinda Jayathilake, Kanthi Perera, Rohini Fernandopulle, Sanjeeva Gunasekera
Susan Msadabwe, Peng Yun Ng, Richard Sullivan, Kennedy Lishimpi, John Kachimba, Justor Banda, Jane Mumba, Abidan Chansa, Mutuna Chiwele, Kasonde Bowa, Kaseya Chiyenu, Linda Malulu-Chiwele, Julie Torode, Grant Lewison, Andrew Leather, Ajay Aggarwal, Kathleen Schmeler, Groesbeck Parham, Kabisa Mwala, Paul Kamfwa
Jessica O Esangbedo, Rachael O Oduyemi, Damilare Aduroja, Yetunde O Tola, Olajumoke Dele-Alonge, Emmanuel O Adesuyi, Michael O Ajiboye, Oluwadamilare Akingbade
Francisca Quintanilla, Álvaro Torres, Monserrat Villar, Catalina Muñoz, José Lizama, Bárbara Mena
Chase Peng Yun Ng, Moira Hegyi, Grant Lewison, Tania Pastrana, Eve Namisango, James Cleary, Barbara Hasties, Eric Kabisa, Helena Musau, Kathryn Spangenberg, Paola Ruiz, Zipporah Ali, Mertixell Mallafre-Larrosa, Alfredo Polo, Julie Torode, Ajay Aggarwal, Richard Sullivan, Mevhibe Hocaoglu