ecancermedicalscience

Review

Conducting Phase IV clinical studies: a moral imperative?

26 Oct 2012
TP Hill

The answer to this question lies in knowing the moral standing of Phase IV studies and whether we ought to conduct them. And to know this, in part, we need to compare them to studies in Phases I, II, and III and then determine where Phase IV studies stand in relation to Phase I–III studies scientifically and commercially.

Related Articles

Pavan Raju Kola, Amith Paruchuri, Nimisha Preman, Hemavathi Baskarane, Vishakha Hooda, Aparna Sharma, Ishaan Gupta, Saran Kumar, Shilpi Minocha, Pranay Tanwar, Mohit Kumar Divakar, Atul Batra
Jaden Paltoo, Danusha Vinoraj, Elizaveta Klekovkina, Alyssa Tilly, John Bosco, John Lule, Akosua Agyemang, Maria Chikasema, Selena Kleber, Mary Goombs, Iddi Matovu, Craig Sinclair, Wendy G. Lichtenthal, Lesley Chalklin, Eve Namisango, Gary Rodin
Leonardo G Da Fonseca, Duilio Reis da Rocha Filho, Aline Lopes Chagas, Alexandre Jacome, Leila Moreira Beltrao Pereira, Rogerio Alves, Mario Reis Alvares-da-Silva, Mauro Donadio, Ana Paula Victorino, Federico Piñero, Cassia Guedes Leal
Pallavi Rajput, Vandita Pahwa, Charu Singh, Sankalp Sancheti, Ravikiran Pawar, Shikha Jain, Gurwinder Kaur, Kundan Rao, Navin Bansal, Rahat Brar, Tapas Dora, Ashish Gulia