ecancermedicalscience

Special Issue

Factors associated with the evaluation of geriatric assessment (GA) domains by oncology specialists in Mexico

31 Aug 2023
Haydeé Cristina Verduzco-Aguirre, Laura Margarita Bolaño-Guerra, Javier Monroy Chargoy, Eva Culakova, Héctor Martinez-Said, Gregorio Quintero Beulo, Supriya G Mohile, Enrique Soto-Perez-De-Celis

The use of geriatric assessment (GA) by oncology specialists in Mexico is low. We aimed to explore factors associated with the evaluation of individual GA domains by Mexican oncology specialists. We performed an exploratory analysis of a sequential explanatory mixed-methods study consisting of an online cross-sectional survey of Mexican oncology specialists and follow-up interviews on the use of GA in cancer care. For each GA domain, we performed multivariable logistic regression analyses with the frequency of evaluation of the domains as the dependent variable (dichotomised as never/rarely/sometimes versus most of the time/always). A p-value <0.05 was considered significant. Qualitative data from the interviews were analysed inductively. Of 196 respondents, 62% were male, 50% were surgical oncologists, 51% took care of >10 patients per day and 61.7% had access to a geriatrician. Self-perceived confidence in managing common geriatric conditions was associated with the evaluation of specific GA domains. For instance, self-perceived confidence in managing dementia (OR 2.72; 95% CI 1.42–5.51, p = 0.008) was associated with cognition evaluation, while for evaluation of falls, self-perceived confidence in evaluation of falls (OR 6.31; 95% CI 3.19–12.46, p < 0.001) was significantly associated. Follow-up interviews showed quality and appropriateness of evaluations may not be ideal: in many cases, physicians do not use guideline-recommended tools. For example, evaluation of cognition is commonly performed through non-validated methods which may miss the detection of patients with an impairment in this domain, partly due to limitations in knowledge and time to use recommended tools. In conclusion, self-perceived confidence in evaluating and managing common situations in older adults was associated with the evaluation of GA domains as part of everyday practice in a sample of oncology specialists in Mexico. This analysis supports the use of educational interventions to boost knowledge and confidence regarding the proper use of validated GA tools among oncology specialists.

Related Articles

Jaden Paltoo, Danusha Vinoraj, Elizaveta Klekovkina, Alyssa Tilly, John Bosco, John Lule, Akosua Agyemang, Maria Chikasema, Selena Kleber, Mary Goombs, Iddi Matovu, Craig Sinclair, Wendy G. Lichtenthal, Lesley Chalklin, Eve Namisango, Gary Rodin
Gbenro E. Olukiran, Adewumi O. Alabi, Anthonia C. Sowunmi, Babatunde Fadipe, Gbenga O. Popoola, Sunday A. Okinbaloye, Hnin L. Nwe Thein, Ololade Kehinde
Leonardo G Da Fonseca, Duilio Reis da Rocha Filho, Aline Lopes Chagas, Alexandre Jacome, Leila Moreira Beltrao Pereira, Rogerio Alves, Mario Reis Alvares-da-Silva, Mauro Donadio, Ana Paula Victorino, Federico Piñero, Cassia Guedes Leal
Olufemi Abiola Oyedeji, Ayoola Moses Bakare, Nosimot Omolola Davies, Olusola Festus Olowoselu, Ann Abiola Ogbenna
Zakayo Ernesti, Emanuel Lugina, Chacha J Mwita, Felister Tupa, Herriethsiah S Noah, John R Ngowi, Charles Wood, Julius Mwaiselage, Salum J Lidenge
Neha Singh, Sujata Agrawal, Zachariah Chowdhury, Shashikant Patne, Ipsita Dhal, Paramita Paul, Sadaf Haiyat, Akhil Kapoor, Anuj Gupta, Bal Krishna Mishra, Mayank Tripathi, Bipinesh Sansar