ecancermedicalscience

Research

Outcome and prognostic variables in childhood rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) with emphasis on impact of FOXO1 Fusions in non-metastatic RMS: Experience from a tertiary cancer centre in India

27 Apr 2023
Subramaniam Ramanathan, Sneha Sisodiya, Omshree Shetty, Maya Prasad, Badira C Parambil, Sneha Shah, Mukta Ramadwar, Nehal Khanna, Siddhartha Laskar, Sajid Qureshi, Tushar Vora, Girish Chinnaswamy

While factors influencing outcomes of rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) in developed countries have evolved from clinical characteristics to molecular profiles, similar data from developing countries are scarce. This is a single-centre analysis of outcomes in treated cases of RMS, with emphasis on prevalence, risk-migration and prognostic impact of Forkhead Box O1 (FOXO1) in non-metastatic RMS. All children with histopathologically proven RMS, treated between January 2013 and December 2018 were included. Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study-4 risk stratification was used, with treatment based on a multimodality-regimen with chemotherapy (Vincristine/Ifosfamide/Etoposide and Vincristine/Actinomycin-D/Cyclophosphamide) and appropriate local therapy. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues were tested using Reverse Transcriptase-Polymerase Chain Reaction for FOXO1-fusions (PAX3(P3F); PAX7(P7F)). A total of 221 children (Cohort-1) were included, of which 182 patients had non-metastatic disease (Cohort-2). Thirty-six (16%), 146 (66%), 39 (18%) patients were low-risk (LR), intermediate-risk (IR) and high-risk, respectively. FOXO1-fusion status was available in 140 patients with localised RMS (Cohort 3). P3F and P7F were detected in 25/49 (51%) and 14/85 (16.5%) of alveolar and embryonal variants, respectively. The 5-year-event-free survival (EFS)/overall survival (OS) of Cohorts 1, 2 and 3 was 48.5%/55.5%, 54.6%/62.6% and 55.1%/63.7%, respectively. Amongst the localised RMS, presence of nodal metastases and primary tumour size > 10 cms were adverse prognostic factorvs (p < 0.05). On incorporating fusion-status in risk-stratification, 6/29 (21%) patients migrated from LR (A/B) to IR. All patients who re-categorised as LR (FOXO1 negative) had a 5-year EFS/OS of 80.81%/90.91%. FOXO1-negative tumours had a better 5-year relapse-free survival (58.92% versus 44.63%; p = 0.296) with a near-significant correlation in favourable-site tumours (75.10% versus 45.83%; p = 0.063). While FOXO1-fusions have superior prognostic utility compared to histology alone in localised, favourable-site RMS, traditional prognostic factors (tumour size and nodal metastases) impacted outcome the most in this subset. Strengthening of early referral systems in community and timely local intervention can help in improving outcome in resource-constrained countries.

Related Articles

Marco Aurélio Bertúlio das Neves, Noemi Dreyer Galvão, Fernanda Cristina da Silva de Lima, Júlio Fernando Pinto Oliveria, Sancho Pedro Xavier, Ageo Mário Cândido da Silva
Parth Sharma Harsh Thakkar, Aryan Patil, Preeti Chauhan, Priya Chembon, Shalini Arora Joseph, Smriti Rana, Raj Kalady, Vidhi Wadhwani, Gaurav Urs, Padmavathy Krishna, Rontu Sangma, Rajendra Dutt Bijalwan, Sunanda Samal, Lalit Selvaraju, Syed Mohammad Askari Naqvi, Jatin Bhukal, Johnsurya John, Muttacaud Ramakrishnan Rajagopal, Siddhesh Zadey
Raul Puente-Vallejo, Alex García-Gutiérrez, Sebastián Jara-Jimenez, Martina Natalia Mosquera-Ruiz, Wilmer Tarupi
David E Gonzalez-Mendoza, Paulina P Rabago-Sanchez, Gabriel Conzuelo-Rodriguez, Angel Gomez-Villanueva
Oluwafemi E Adesina, Oluwadamilare Akingbade, Emmanuel O Adesuyi, Yetunde Tola, Ooreofe Bolanle Adeyemi, Tosin Akintunde, Stephan Osei, Julius Maitanmi, Deborah T Esan