ecancermedicalscience

Research

Outcome and prognostic variables in childhood rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) with emphasis on impact of FOXO1 Fusions in non-metastatic RMS: Experience from a tertiary cancer centre in India

27 Apr 2023
Subramaniam Ramanathan, Sneha Sisodiya, Omshree Shetty, Maya Prasad, Badira C Parambil, Sneha Shah, Mukta Ramadwar, Nehal Khanna, Siddhartha Laskar, Sajid Qureshi, Tushar Vora, Girish Chinnaswamy

While factors influencing outcomes of rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) in developed countries have evolved from clinical characteristics to molecular profiles, similar data from developing countries are scarce. This is a single-centre analysis of outcomes in treated cases of RMS, with emphasis on prevalence, risk-migration and prognostic impact of Forkhead Box O1 (FOXO1) in non-metastatic RMS. All children with histopathologically proven RMS, treated between January 2013 and December 2018 were included. Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study-4 risk stratification was used, with treatment based on a multimodality-regimen with chemotherapy (Vincristine/Ifosfamide/Etoposide and Vincristine/Actinomycin-D/Cyclophosphamide) and appropriate local therapy. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues were tested using Reverse Transcriptase-Polymerase Chain Reaction for FOXO1-fusions (PAX3(P3F); PAX7(P7F)). A total of 221 children (Cohort-1) were included, of which 182 patients had non-metastatic disease (Cohort-2). Thirty-six (16%), 146 (66%), 39 (18%) patients were low-risk (LR), intermediate-risk (IR) and high-risk, respectively. FOXO1-fusion status was available in 140 patients with localised RMS (Cohort 3). P3F and P7F were detected in 25/49 (51%) and 14/85 (16.5%) of alveolar and embryonal variants, respectively. The 5-year-event-free survival (EFS)/overall survival (OS) of Cohorts 1, 2 and 3 was 48.5%/55.5%, 54.6%/62.6% and 55.1%/63.7%, respectively. Amongst the localised RMS, presence of nodal metastases and primary tumour size > 10 cms were adverse prognostic factorvs (p < 0.05). On incorporating fusion-status in risk-stratification, 6/29 (21%) patients migrated from LR (A/B) to IR. All patients who re-categorised as LR (FOXO1 negative) had a 5-year EFS/OS of 80.81%/90.91%. FOXO1-negative tumours had a better 5-year relapse-free survival (58.92% versus 44.63%; p = 0.296) with a near-significant correlation in favourable-site tumours (75.10% versus 45.83%; p = 0.063). While FOXO1-fusions have superior prognostic utility compared to histology alone in localised, favourable-site RMS, traditional prognostic factors (tumour size and nodal metastases) impacted outcome the most in this subset. Strengthening of early referral systems in community and timely local intervention can help in improving outcome in resource-constrained countries.

Related Articles

Ya Haddy Sallah, Verna Vanderpuye, Rahel Ghebre, Khadija Warfa, Alex Mutombo Baleka, Hannah Naa Gogwe Ayettey Anie, Pa Omadou Sallah, Esayas Berhanu Enoro, Namugga Jane, Rose Anorlu
Callie Daniels-Howell, Rumalie Corvera, Lizzie Chambers, Alex Daniels, Rhea Jayma, B-Etta ‘Babes’ Ayon, Nenacia Nirena Ranali ‘Rana’ Mendoza, Fatima Lorenzo, Liza Naranjo, Carmen Auste, Poh Heng Chong, Mike Palfreman, Justin N Baker, Michael J McNeil, Megan Doherty, Julia Downing
Victor Rivera Francia, Alejandro Leon Garrido-Lecca, Virgilio E Failoc-Rojas, Robert Villacorta, Yesenia Huerta-Collado, Carlos Carracedo, Marco Villena-Lazo, Luis Casanova Marquez
Joshua Agilinko, Sonam Patel, Jogitha Selvarajah, Nicholas Tekkis, Mathew Vithayathil, Suzette Samlalsingh
Deepak Sudhakaran, Anoushka Arora, Smriti Rana, Amirtha Thampi, Sunilkumar, Parth Sharma