ecancermedicalscience

Review

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence of therapeutic targets in cervical cancer

9 Mar 2021
Maria Guadalupe Patrono, Maria Florencia Calvo, Juan Victor Ariel Franco, Virginia Garrote, Valeria Vietto

Cervical Cancer (CC) is a significantly prevalent disease in developing countries. Currently, targeted therapies are not a primary standard of care in CC. This information could be crucial for developing directed therapies and patient screening for biomarkers that would allow personalised treatment of CC. This systematic review aimed to estimate the prevalence of potential therapeutic targets such as the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and the PI3K/Akt/mTOR and Ras/Raf/MAPK pathways in patients with CC, identified through genomic and non-genomic testing. Studies were identified through an ad-hoc search strategy from the available on MEDLINE (Ovid), CENTRAL, LILACS, SCOPUS, through the Clinical Trial registry on Clinicaltrials.gov, International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, RENIS (Argentine National Registry of Health Research) and grey literature sources. We included 74 studies which represented a total pool of 7,862 participants. Forty-five studies informed mutations of EGFR, with a combined positivity rate of 53% (95%CI: 45%–60%; I2 = 95%). Twenty studies informed the presence of mutations in PIK3CA with a combined positivity rate of 30% (95%CI: 21%–39%; I2 = 96%). Twenty-three studies reported a mutation in Ras, with a combined positivity rate of 14% (95%CI: 8%–21%; I2 = 95%). Raf mutations were informed in six studies. Six studies informed the presence of Akt mutations, two studies informed mTOR mutations and only one study reported mutations of MAPK. The most frequently described therapeutic targets were EGFR, and the PIK3CA and Ras pathways, though inconsistency in positivity rates was significant. Our study did not allow the identification of any specific clinical characteristics that might explain the observed heterogeneity. Despite the overall good quality of the included studies, the applicability of these results to patients’ general population with CC is still unclear.

Related Articles

Zakayo Ernesti, Emanuel Lugina, Chacha J Mwita, Felister Tupa, Herriethsiah S Noah, John R Ngowi, Charles Wood, Julius Mwaiselage, Salum J Lidenge
Neha Singh, Sujata Agrawal, Zachariah Chowdhury, Shashikant Patne, Ipsita Dhal, Paramita Paul, Sadaf Haiyat, Akhil Kapoor, Anuj Gupta, Bal Krishna Mishra, Mayank Tripathi, Bipinesh Sansar
Sandro Casavilca-Zambrano, Juan Contreras-Mancilla, Camille Laurent, Jaqueline Montoya, Rosdali Diaz-Coronado, Jorge Honles, Ruddy Liendo-Picoaga, Jenny Bonifacio-Mundaca, Jhoysi Casas-Goñas, Juan Pablo Cerapio, Carlos Barrionuevo, Tatiana Vidaurre, Stéphane Bertani
Chase Peng Yun Ng, Asmita Raja, Alicia Hunter, Sai Kalpitha Eragamreddy, Grace Tan, Shahin Sayed, Looi Lai-Meng, Leke Folaranmi, Beatriz Hornburg, Meritxell Mallafre-Larrosa, Julie Torode, Ajay Aggarwal, Kenneth Fleming, Richard Sullivan
Elizabeth Hatzaw, Jane Ralte, Vignesh Krishnasamy, Lalengkimi Ralte, Rajendra Bose Muthukumaran, Kasi Marimuthu, Nachimuthu Senthil Kumar