Our website uses cookies to improve your on-site experience. By using the website, cookies are being used as described in our Policy Document
Warning: To log in you will need to enable cookies and reload the page (Policy Document)
My ePortfolio Register   

Abstract | Full HTML Article | PDF ecancer 12 818 / https://doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2018.818


Cystic brain metastases in ALK-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer

Guilherme Nader Marta, Renata Rodrigues da Cunha Colombo Bonadio, Renata Eiras Martins, Henrique Bortot Zuppani and Gilberto de Castro Junior

Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP 01246-000, Brazil

Correspondence to: Guilherme Nader Marta. Email: guilherme.marta@usp.br


The central nervous system (CNS) is a common site of disease progression in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-rearrangement treated with crizotinib. Cystic brain metastases (CBM) have been recently identified as one possible variant of this disease. An illustrative case report is presented along with a literature review performed in order to track relevant papers about CBM in ALK-rearranged NSCLC, including possible pathophysiology, differential diagnosis and treatment options for this condition. Three case reports have been published describing six ALK-rearranged NSCLC patients presenting with CBM, all of which were under treatment with crizotinib by the time of CBM diagnosis. Treatment with CNS-penetrating tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) resulted in CNS disease control in three of the six cases reported either as single therapy or in combination with radiation therapy (RT). Investigation of differential diagnoses of CBM might be necessary, which include inflammatory and demyelinating disorders, primary brain tumours and infectious diseases, especially neurocysticercosis that might mimic CBM images. Treatment options include RT, CNS-penetrating TKIs and invasive procedures, such as stereotactic drainage. Thus, CBM are associated with ALK-rearranged NSCLC, particularly in patients who use crizotinib and should prompt investigation of differential diagnosis. CNS-penetrating TKIs are effective in the control of solid brain metastases and also seem to be active in CBM as single therapy or in combination with RT.

Keywords: non-small cell lung cancer, anaplastic lymphoma kinase, cystic brain metastases, crizotinib, neurocysticercosis

Copyright: © the authors; licensee ecancermedicalscience. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Published: 14/03/18; Received: 04/02/2018


A chromosomal inversion leading to the fusion of the anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene with the echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4 (EML4) gene was identified in 2007 [1], resulting in the EML4-ALK fusion protein, a therapeutic target in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients with EML4-ALK fusion and other ALK rearrangements represent 3–7% of all NSCLC cases, usually associated with younger age, never smoking or light smoking history and adenocarcinoma histology (especially in those tumours harbouring signet-ring cell features) [1, 2]. This subset of patients is responsive to the ALK inhibitor crizotinib, with an objective response rate of approximately 60% and a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 8–10 months [3, 4].

However, the majority of the patients who respond to crizotinib will relapse within a few months interval [5, 6], with a median PFS of 10.9 months as a first line therapy and 7.7 months when used after disease progression to chemotherapy [4, 7]. One of the most common sites of progressive disease (PD) in patients with ALK-rearranged NSCLC is central nervous system (CNS), presumably due to the poor blood-brain barrier penetration of crizotinib and the development of mutations related to resistance to crizotinib [5, 8, 9]. The second- and third-generation ALK TKIs have better CNS penetration, showing efficacy in controlling brain metastases in phase-I and phase-II studies [1013]. Cystic brain metastases (CBM) are a particular variant that have been reported in association with ALK-rearranged NSCLC [1416] and may represent a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge in this clinical setting. We herein report a case of CBM in ALK-rearranged NSCLC and a literature review.

Illustrative case

A 63-year-old non-smoker man was diagnosed with lung adenocarcinoma in 2013, with pleural involvement by the time of the diagnosis (stage IV). The patient was treated with chemotherapy with carboplatin Area under the curve 6 and paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 for four cycles every 21 days, with stable disease (SD) as best response to the first line therapy. Follow-up evaluation detected disease progression after 3 months, at the end of platinum-doublet, with lymph node enlargement and pleural effusion. The patient underwent pleurodesis and second line chemotherapy with docetaxel 75 mg/m2 every 21 days for eight cycles (6 months). During second-line therapy, the biopsied tumour tissue was submitted to fluorescent in situ hybridization analysis (LSI ALK Dual Color Breakapart DNA probe; Vysis®, Abbott Park, IL, U.S.A) that revealed the presence of ALK rearrangement (Figure 1), leading to the initiation of crizotinib 250 mg twice daily. 13 months later, the patient presented with symptoms suggestive of absence crises. A brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed brain lesions, suggestive of secondary brain metastases. Chest computed tomography (CT) also showed systemic disease progression in the lung and lymph nodes. Crizotinib was discontinued and the patient was submitted to whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) (3000 cGy in 10 fractions). Two months after the end of radiotherapy, the patient presented to the emergency department reporting unsteady gait and abnormal mental status characterised by confusion and disorientation. A new MRI of the head demonstrated enlargement of lesions in both cerebral hemispheres, with a predominantly cystic pattern and a contrast enhancement of the cysts wall, without significant surrounding vasogenic oedema. The MRI report suggested that this pattern of lesion was consistent with either neurocysticercosis or metastatic CNS involvement. The patient underwent investigation for neurocysticercosis with cerebrospinal fluid enzyme linked immunosorbent assay, fundoscopic examination and western blot, all of which resulted negative. A biopsy of a new pleural lesion was performed and pathologic analysis demonstrated adenocarcinoma infiltration. After extensive investigation, the cystic brain lesions were attributed to brain metastasis and ceritinib (formerly known as LDK378, Novartis, Basel, Switzerland) was initiated (compassive use). The patient presented important clinical benefit afterwards, with improvement of all neurologic symptoms within 2 weeks. The brain MRI and the chest CT showed partial response (PR) in both brain and systemic lesions (Figure 2).


A search in the PubMed/Medline/Lilacs/Scielo database was conducted in order to track relevant papers about CBM in ALK-rearranged NSCLC. The keywords included in the search were ‘cystic brain metastasis’, ‘ALK’, ‘brain metastasis’, ‘crizotinib’ and ‘pathogenesis’. Case reports, series, retrospective, and prospective studies were all eligible for our analysis. Articles were screened and critically analysed.

Figure 1. Break-apart fluorescence in situ hybridisation of the presented case.

Figure 2. MRI in axial T1-weighted post contrast images demonstrates cystic lesions with ring enhancement in the baseline examination (A and B), delineating cystic areas and ill-defined nodular areas within it, with no surrounding oedema. There was a slight reduction of the lesions after 3 months of ceritinib (C and D), with signs of a more evident response after 6 months (E and F), with reduction of the cystic component of some lesions, and after 9 months (G and H), with reduction of the cystic components and the enhancement.


Three case reports have been published describing six ALK-rearranged NSCLC patients presenting with CBM [1416], all of which were under treatment with crizotinib by the time of CBM diagnosis. The treatment and the evolution of these patients are described in Table 1.

Treatment with CNS-penetrating tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) resulted in CNS disease control in three of the six cases reported: one received ceritinib, presenting intracranial PR (case 3) [15], and two received brigatinib, presenting intracranial PR and SD (cases 4 and 5) [16]. It is noteworthy that the patient who presented PR to brigatinib was not exposed to radiation therapy (RT). Similarly, our case also presented intracranial PR after treatment with ceritinib (Figure 1).

Table 1. Case reports of CBM in ALK-rearranged NSCLC.

Table 2. Case reports of CBM in NSCLC without ALK status report.

Alongside with CNS-penetrating TKIs, RT was the mainsteam of CBM treatment. In our case report, the patient presented PD 2 months after the end of WBRT. Variable responses to RT were described in four of the previously reported cases who were treated with WBRT and/or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Favourable results were seen in one patient with ALK-rearranged signet-ring cell carcinoma of the lung, who presented complete response after WBRT and crizotinib beyond progression (BP) (case 1) [14] and in another patient who had SD after SRS as monotherapy (case 6) [16]. In the other two cases, however, SRS in association with crizotinib BP (case 3) [15] resulted in PD, even when preceded by WBRT (case 5) [16]. In both cases, CNS disease control was only achieved when CNS-penetrating TKIs (ceritinib and brigatinib, respectively) were initiated [15, 16].

Invasive treatment with cyst drainage using an Ommaya reservoir has also been reported in association with crizotinib BP, resulting in SD in one patient (case 2) [14].

CBM have also been reported in cases of lung adenocarcinoma in which the ALK status was not evaluated. These cases are described in Table 2.


Little is known about the mechanism that leads to the formation of the CBM.

Cumings et al [17] evaluating the pathophysiology of any CBM suggested that it occurs because of the tumour degeneration followed by transudation of fluid nearby blood vessels. Another mechanism, suggested by Gardner et al [18], was that the alteration of lymphatic drainage leads to interstitial fluid accumulation.

In the case of CBM in ALK-rearranged NSCLC, as mentioned before, all the cases reported to date occurred during treatment with crizotinib. Hayashi et al [14] hypothesised that the cystic brain lesions in ALK-rearranged NSCLC might occur because of the action of crizotinib in brain metastases with a cystic degeneration occurring as a response to the target agent. Indeed, crizotinib has shown CNS activity in retrospective analyses, with higher intracranial disease control rates among patients with previously treated brain metastases [19]. However, although some intracranial response to crizotinib occurs [19, 20], this drug has low blood-brain barrier penetration leading to limited CNS response rates [8]. Considering this, one would not expect that an extraordinary response to crizotinib would be the reason for the cystic metastasis. Moreover, when the CNS-penetrating TKIs were used in the reported cases, it resulted in response with reduction and/or resolution of the cystic lesions.

Another explanation for the CBM pointed by Hayashi et al [14] is that the signet-ring cells produce abundant mucus resulting in the cyst formation. In fact, in cases submitted to excisional biopsy or cyst drainage, abundant mucinous material was observed [16].

Narayanan et al [16] combined these two hypotheses suggesting that the CBM occurred because of a combination of both a histology related to mucus production and an action of crizotinib affecting local disease behaviour in CNS.

It is known that the CNS action of crizotinib is limited because of the low blood-brain barrier penetration of the drug, that achieves a cerebrospinal fluid to plasma ratio of only 0.0026 [8]. Nevertheless, a retrospective analysis of PROFILE 1005 and PROFILE 1007 trials has shown intracranial response rates of 18% in patients without prior brain radiotherapy and 33% in patients with prior brain radiotherapy [19]. When compared with chemotherapy, crizotinib also showed superior intracranial disease control rates (disease control rate of 85% with crizotinib versus 45% with chemotherapy in 12 weeks and 56% and 25%, respectively, in 24 weeks) [20]. Therefore, there seems to exist some action of crizotinib in CNS. This limited action could justify the formation of the CBM. While part of the tumoural cells would suffer necrosis with crizotinib action, a considerable part of the cells would remain viable, leading to the fluid formation surrounded by active tumoural cells in the cyst wall.

Despite the exposed hypothesis, it still remains to be clarified if crizotinib is in fact related to the development of the CBM or if it occurs regardless of crizotinib use in ALK-rearranged NSCLC.

One possibility is that the CBM would not occur because of a direct effect of crizotinib, but actually because of the combination of two factors: the actuation of the CNS as a sanctuary during crizotinib use associated with the longer life expectation of these patients in use of anti-ALK TKIs. Because of this, after 2 years of crizotinib use, 50–60% of the patients present brain metastases [21]. This explanation might justify as well the higher development of the CBM as a variant pattern.

Differential diagnoses

Despite the increasing number of CBM reported in patients with ALK-rearranged NSCLC, this presentation remains unusual. Thus, it might be necessary to consider some differential diagnoses, which might present with a similar radiographic pattern. Table 3 summarizes the possible differential diagnoses of cystic brain lesions.

Brain metastasis is the most common intracranial tumour in adults [22], occurring in up to 30% of patients with cancer [23]. Lung cancer is the leading cause of brain metastasis, followed by melanoma and renal cell carcinoma [23]. In ALK-rearranged NSCLC, lifetime incidence of brain metastases approaches 50% [24]. The classical radiological finding of a brain metastasis is a solid and/or heterogeneous ring-enhancing mass with well-defined margins and extensive surrounding oedema [22], commonly found in the grey-white junction. CBM, however, usually show no vasogenic oedema and mild or no contrast enhancement, limited to the cyst wall [16].

Neurocysticercosis is an endemic disease in developing countries of Africa, Asia, Central and South America [25] and is the most common parasitic disease of the brain [26]. In some situations, brain images are unable to accurately differentiate neurocysticercosis from CBM. There are some cases reported in which this differentiation was needed [2732]. Each of the four developmental stages of the cysts determines different imaging findings: (1) vesicular stage is the earliest phase, characterised by thin-walled cysts, often with the classical mural nodule representing the scolex and usually with neither oedema nor contrast enhancement [22, 33, 34]; (2) colloidal-vesicular stage marks the beginning of cyst degeneration which leads to host inflammatory response and consequent pericystic oedema and cyst wall enhancement [34]; (3) granular nodular (or healing) stage imaging pattern on CT scan consists of isoattenuated cysts with hyperattenuated calcified scolex, with persistent contrast enhancement and surrounding oedema [22] and (4) quiescent (residual) stage radiological pattern is represented by calcified nodules without mass effect [33, 34]. Despite imaging studies and serological tests, which are the basis of neurocysticercosis diagnosis, some cases might still require invasive procedures, such as stereotactic brain biopsy, to establish the correct diagnosis [23].

Table 3. Differential diagnoses of brain cystic lesions.


There is little evidence available to suggest a standard treatment of the CBM in ALK-rearranged NSCLC.

Based on the case reports published to date, treatment options for the CBM include RT (WBRT or SRS) and/or CNS-penetrating TKIs.

Since ALK-rearranged NSCLC usually occurs in younger patients, many of whom are, otherwise, healthy and functional, the risk of cognitive sequel related to WBRT is an important issue when considering RT. Therefore, CNS-penetrating TKIs should be preferred over WBRT as first line therapy in this clinical setting. SRS, on the other hand, is related to less cognitive sequel and it is the preferred RT, when feasible [3537].

In the cases treated with RT, continuation of crizotinib BP might also be considered. In the case of oligoprogressive disease, when it is considered that the patient is still presenting clinical benefit with crizotinib, the continuation of the drug might extend its benefit [38].

To date, CNS-penetrating TKIs, including ceritinib and alectinib, are approved for use after progression to crizotinib [1013]. Two recently published phase-III trials showed benefit of ceritinib (ASCEND-4) [39] and alectinib (ALEX [40] and J-ALEX) [41] in first-line scenario. In the phase-II and -III trials, these drugs presented intracranial responses rates ranging from 39% to 75% [1013, 39]. Including patients with no prior RT had intracranial response rate as high as 69.2% with ceritinib [39] and 67% with alectinib [12]. The third-generation anti-ALK TKIs brigatinib and lorlatinib also have shown CNS efficacy in earlier phase studies, with intracranial response rate of 41% and 44%, respectively [42, 43].

Based on the case reports of CBM, it seems that the CNS-penetrating TKIs might also have efficacy in the CBM as well as they have in the solid brain lesions. One of the reported cases presented PR to a CNS-penetrating TKI without prior brain irradiation [16], a strategy that might even allow avoidance or postponement of brain radiotherapy.

Another possible strategy described for the treatment of CBM is stereotactic drainage. Kim et al [44] suggested that for large CBM, regardless of the primary tumour site, the combination of stereotactic drainage and radiosurgery might be considered. Since the large size of the cysts might limit RT, cyst drainage would allow reducing the tumour volume, turning it possible to perform radiosurgery. Wang et al [45] evaluated the treatment of large CBM with stereotactic aspiration followed by Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS). 48 patients were analysed, of which 60% had NSCLC as the primary tumour. Tumour control rate in 3 months was 91.7%. Franzin et al [46] reported similar results with a local tumour control rate of 91.3% in 3 months after the treatment of CBM with stereotactic drainage and GKRS in 23 patients (63% of which had NSCLC as the primary tumour). This strategy might be considered for large CBM.


Based on the present and on the previous case reports, we conclude that ALK-rearranged NSCLC is associated with CBM, particularly in patients in use of crizotinib. Despite that, this metastatic pattern is still unusual and differential diagnosis should be investigated when the etiologic diagnosis of the cystic lesion is not clear.

Regarding the treatment options, the CNS-penetrating TKIs are effective in the control of solid brain metastases and also seem to be active in the CBM. RT (WBRT or SRS), with or without continuation of the TKI, might also be considered, with variable results. Moreover, stereotactic drainage might be considered previous to the RT for large CBM.

With the increasing experience with the management of ALK-rearranged NSCLC, it is expected that more cases will be studied, leading to improved knowledge about the best strategy for treating these patients with CBM.

Conflicts of interest

Guilherme Nader Marta, Renata R da C Colombo Bonadio and Henrique Bortot Zuppani have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Renata Eiras Martins—travel grants: Pfizer; lectures: Pfizer; investigator of sponsored trials: Pfizer, Novartis, Roche.

Gilberto de Castro Junior—member of advisory board: Pfizer, Novartis; travel grants: Pfizer, Novartis; lectures: Pfizer; investigator of sponsored trials: Pfizer, Novartis, Roche.

Authors’ contributions

Conception and design of study: Guilherme Nader Marta, Renata Eiras Martins

Acquisition of data: Guilherme Nader Marta, Renata R da C Colombo Bonadio, Renata Eiras Martins, Henrique Bortot Zuppani, Gilberto de Castro Junior

Analysis and/or interpretation of data: Guilherme Nader Marta, Renata R da C Colombo Bonadio, Renata Eiras Martins, Gilberto de Castro Junior

Drafting the manuscript: Guilherme Nader Marta, Renata R da C Colombo Bonadio

Revising the manuscript critically for important intellectual content: Renata Eiras Martins, Henrique Bortot Zuppani, Gilberto de Castro Junior


1. Soda M, Choi YL, and Enomoto M, et al (2007) Identification of the transforming EML4-ALK fusion gene in non-small-cell lung cancer Nature 448(7153) 561–566 [http://www.nature.com/doifinder/10.1038/nature05945] https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05945 Date accessed: 10/09/17

2. Shaw AT, Yeap BY, and Mino-Kenudson M, et al (2009) Clinical features and outcome of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer who harbor EML4-ALK J Clin Oncol 27(26) 4247–4253 [http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.6993] https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.6993 Date accessed: 10/09/17

3. Kwak EL, Bang Y-J, and Camidge DR, et al (2010) Anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibition in non–small-cell lung cancer N Engl J Med 363(18) 1693–1703 [http://www.nejm.org/doi/abs/10.1056/NEJMoa1006448] https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1006448 PMID: 20979469 PMCID: 3014291 Date accessed: 10/09/17

4. Shaw AT, Kim D-W, and Nakagawa K, et al (2013) Crizotinib versus chemotherapy in advanced ALK-positive lung cancer N Engl J Med 368(25) 2385–2394 [http://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa1214886] https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1214886 PMID: 23724913 Date accessed: 10/09/17

5. Choi YL, Soda M, and Yamashita Y, et al (2010) EML4-ALK mutations in lung cancer that confer resistance to ALK inhibitors N Engl J Med 363(18) 1734–1739 [http://www.nejm.org/doi/abs/10.1056/NEJMoa1007478] https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1007478 PMID: 20979473 Date accessed: 10/09/17

6. Camidge DR, Bang Y-J, and Kwak EL, et al (2012) Activity and safety of crizotinib in patients with ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: updated results from a phase 1 study Lancet Oncol 13(10) 1011–1019 [http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1470204512703443] https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70344-3 PMID: 22954507 PMCID: 3936578 Date accessed: 10/09/17

7. Solomon BJ, Mok T, and Kim D-W, et al (2014) First-line crizotinib versus chemotherapy in ALK-positive lung cancer N Engl J Med 371(23) 2167–2177 [http://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa1408440] https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1408440 PMID: 25470694 Date accessed: 10/09/17

8. Costa DB, Kobayashi S, and Pandya SS, et al (2011) CSF concentration of the anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitor crizotinib J Clin Oncol 29(15) 443–445 https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2010.34.1313 Date accessed: 10/09/17

9. Awad MM and Shaw AT (2014) ALK inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer: crizotinib and beyond Clin Adv Hematol Oncol 12(7) 429–439 [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25322323] PMID: 25322323 PMCID: 4215402 Date accessed: 10/09/17

10. Kim DW, Mehra R, and Tan DSW, et al (2016) Activity and safety of ceritinib in patients with ALK-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer (ASCEND-1): updated results from the multicentre, open-label, phase 1 trial Lancet Oncol 17(4) 452–463 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00614-2 PMID: 26973324 PMCID: 5063047

11. Crinó L, Ahn MJ, and De Marinis F, et al (2016) Multicenter phase II study of whole-body and intracranial activity with ceritinib in patients with ALK-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer previously treated with chemotherapy and crizotinib: results from ASCEND-2 J Clin Oncol 34(24) 2866–2873 https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2015.65.5936 PMID: 27432917

12. Shaw AT, Gandhi L, and Gadgeel S, et al (2016) Alectinib in ALK-positive, crizotinib-resistant, non-small-cell lung cancer: a single-group, multicentre, phase 2 trial Lancet Oncol 17(2) 234–242 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00488-X PMCID: 4752892

13. Ou SI, Ahn JS, and De Petris L, et al (2016) Alectinib in crizotinib-refractory ALK-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase II global study J Clin Oncol 34(7) 661–668 https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2015.63.9443

14. Hayashi H, Okamoto I, and Tanizaki J, et al (2014) Cystic brain metastasis in non–small-cell lung cancer with ALK rearrangement J Clin Oncol 32(36) e122–e124 https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2012.48.2141 PMID: 24567432

15. Saraceni C, Li PM, and Gainor JF, et al (2015) Cystic brain metastases in NSCLC harboring the EML4-ALK translocation after treatment with crizotinib J Thorac Oncol 10(7) 1116–1117 [http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1556086415335012] https://doi.org/10.1097/JTO.0000000000000409 PMID: 26134230 Date accessed: 10/09/17

16. Narayanan V, Honce MJ, and Mehrotra S, et al (2016) Cystic brain metastases occurring in anaplastic lymphoma kinase gene rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer patients receiving crizotinib Clin Lung Cancer 17(1) 85–90 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cllc.2015.07.003

17. Cumings JN (1950) The chemistry of cerebral cysts Brain 73 244–250 https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/73.2.244 PMID: 14791790

18. Gardner WJ, Collis JS Jr, and Lewis LA (1963) Cystic brain tumors and the blood-brain barrier. Comparison of protein fractions in cyst fluids and sera Arch Neurol 8 291–298 https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.1963.00460030075007 PMID: 13946556

19. Costa DB, Shaw AT, and Ou SH, et al (2015) Clinical experience with crizotinib in patients with advanced ALK-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer and brain metastases J Clin Oncol 33 1881–1888 https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2014.59.0539 PMID: 25624436 PMCID: 4451171

20. Solomon BJ, Cappuzzo F, and Felip E, et al (2016) Intracranial efficacy of crizotinib versus chemotherapy in patients with advanced ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: results from PROFILE 1014 J Clin Oncol 34(24) 2858–2865 https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2015.63.5888 PMID: 27022118

21. Shi W and Dicker AP (2016) CNS metastases in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer and ALK gene rearrangement J Clin Oncol 34(2) 107–109 [http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/doi/10.1200/JCO.2015.63.9682] https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2015.63.9682 Date accessed: 10/09/17

22. Sharma V, Prabhash K, and Noronha V, et al (2013) A systematic approach to diagnosis of cystic brain lesions South Asian J cancer 2(2) 98–101 [http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3876643&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract] https://doi.org/10.4103/2278-330X.110509 Date accessed: 10/09/17

23. Costa R, Costa RB, and Bacchi C, et al (2014) Adenocarcinoma of the lung presenting with atypical cystic brain lesions BMJ Case Rep https://doi.org/10.1136/bcr-2013-203506

24. Shaw AT, Yeap BY, and Solomon BJ, et al (2011) Effect of crizotinib on overall survival in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer harbouring ALK gene rearrangement: a retrospective analysis Lancet Oncol 12(11) 1004–1012 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70232-7 PMID: 21933749 PMCID: 3328296

25. Willingham AL and Engels D (2006) Control of Taenia solium Cysticercosis/taeniosis Adv Parasitol 61 509–566 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-308X(05)61012-3 PMID: 16735172

26. Colli BO, Carlotti CG, and Assirati JA, et al (2002) Surgical treatment of cerebral cysticercosis: long-term results and prognostic factors Neurosurg Focus 12(6) 1–13 [http://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/foc.2002.12.6.4]

27. Coulibaly B, Gautier G, and Fuentes S, et al (2008) Degenerating neurocysticercosis cysts: differential diagnosis with cerebral metastasis Rev Neurol (Paris) 164(11) 948–952 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurol.2008.03.019 Date accessed: 10/09/17

28. Mota PC, Reis C, and Pires NF, et al (2011) Lung cancer: atypical brain metastases mimicking neurocysticercosis Int J Clin Oncol 16(6) 746–750 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-011-0221-7 PMID: 21437571

29. Troiani C, Lopes CC, and Scardovelli CA, et al (2011) Cystic brain metastases radiologically simulating neurocysticercosis Sao Paulo Med J 129(5) 352–356 [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22069135] https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-31802011000500011

30. Choi H and Choi S (2012) Multiple cystic brain metastases from adenocarcinoma mimicking cysticercosis: case report Clin Neuroradiol 22(1) 105–107 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-011-0074-5 Date accessed: 10/09/17

31. Bago-Rozankovic P, Basic S, and Vavro H, et al (2013) Multiple cystic brain metastases from papillary thyroid carcinoma mimicking neurocysticercosis Int J Surg Pathol 21(4) 390–393 https://doi.org/10.1177/1066896912473353 PMID: 23349474

32. Lam JC, Robinson SR, and Schell A, et al (2016) Pulmonary neuroendocrine carcinoma mimicking neurocysticercosis: a case report J Med Case Rep 10(1) 144 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13256-016-0910-y PMID: 27250121 PMCID: 4890325

33. AJ Osbom and IS Blaser KS (2004) 6 Parasites, miscellaneous Diagnostic Imaging: Brain (Salt Lake City: Amirsys) pp 8–53 [https://scholar.google.com.br/scholar?hl=pt-BR&q=Salzman KL. Parasites, miscellaneous. In: Diagnostic Imaging: Brain. Salt Lake City, Utah: Amirsys; 2004. 853]

34. Osborn AG (1994) 7 infections of the brain and its linings Diagnostic Neuroradiology ed Anne Osborne (St Louis: Mosby) pp 709–713 [https://scholar.google.com.br/scholar?hl=pt-BR&q=Osborn AG. Infections of the brain and its linings. In: Diagnostic Neuroradiology. St Louis, Mo: Mosby; 1994. p. 70913] Date accessed: 10/09/17

35. Sahgal A, Aoyama H, and Kocher M, et al (2015) Phase 3 trials of stereotactic radiosurgery with or without whole-brain radiationtherapy for 1 to 4 brain metastases: individual patient data meta-analysis Int J Radiat Oncol BiolPhys 91 710–717 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.10.024 Date accessed: 10/09/17

36. Yamamoto M, Serizawa T, and Shuto T, et al (2014) Stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with multiple brain metastases (JLGK0901): a multi-institutional prospective observational study Lancet Oncol 15 387–395 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70061-0 PMID: 24621620

37. Johung KL, Yeh N, and Desai NB, et al (2015) Extended survival and prognostic factors for patients with ALK-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer and brain metastasis J Clin Oncol 34(2) 123–129 https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2015.62.0138 PMID: 26438117 PMCID: 5070549

38. Weickhardt AJ, Scheier B, and Burke JM, et al (2012) Local ablative therapy of oligoprogressive disease prolongs disease control by tyrosine kinase inhibitors in oncogene-addicted non-small-cell lung cancer J Thorac Oncol 7(12) 1807–1814 https://doi.org/10.1097/JTO.0b013e3182745948 PMID: 23154552 PMCID: 3506112

39. Soria J-C, Tan DSW, and Chiari R, et al (2017) First-line ceritinib versus platinum-based chemotherapy in advanced ALK-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer (ASCEND-4): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study Lancet 389(10072) 917–929 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30123-X PMID: 28126333

40. Peters S, Camidge DR, and Shaw AT, et al (2017) Alectinib versus crizotinib in untreated ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer N Engl J Med [http://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa1704795] https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1704795

41. Hida T, Nokihara H, and Kondo M, et al (2017) Articles alectinib versus crizotinib in patients with ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (J-ALEX): an open-label, randomised phase 3 trial Lancet [http://www.thelancet.com/pdfs/journals/lancet/PIIS0140-6736(17)30565-2.pdf] https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30565-2 Date accessed: 10/09/17

42. Gettinger SN, Bazhenova LA, and Langer CJ, et al (2016) Activity and safety of brigatinib in ALK-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer and other malignancies: a single-arm, open-label, phase 1/2 trial Lancet Oncol 17(12) 1683–1696 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30392-8 PMID: 27836716 Date accessed: 10/09/17

43. Solomon BJ, Bauer TM, and Felip E, et al (2016) Safety and efficacy of lorlatinib (PF-06463922) from the dose-escalation component of a study in patients with advanced ALK or ROS1 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) J Clin Oncol 34 9009

44. Kim M, Cheok S, and Chung LK, et al (2015) Characteristics and treatments of large cystic brain metastasis: radiosurgery and stereotactic aspiration Brain tumor Res Treat 3(1) 1–7 https://doi.org/10.14791/btrt.2015.3.1.1 PMID: 25977901 PMCID: 4426272

45. Wang H, Qi S, and Dou C, et al (2016) Gamma Knife radiosurgery combined with stereotactic aspiration as an effective treatment method for large cystic brain metastases Oncol Lett 12(1) 343–347 https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2016.4603 PMID: 27347148 PMCID: 4907086

46. Franzin A, Vimercati A, and Picozzi P, et al (2008) Stereotactic drainage and Gamma Knife radiosurgery of cystic brain metastasis J Neurosurg 109(2) 259–267 https://doi.org/10.3171/JNS/2008/109/8/0259 PMID: 18671638

47. Hayashi H, Okamoto I, and Tanizaki J, et al (2014) Cystic brain metastasis in non–small-cell lung cancer with ALK rearrangement J Clin Oncol 32(36) e122–e124 [http://ascopubs.org/doi/abs/10.1200/JCO.2012.48.2141]

48. Surov A, Hainz M, and Kornhuber M (2009) Multiple cystic metastases in the brain from adenocarcinoma of the lung Am J Med 122(9) e3–e4 PMID: 19699367

Keywords: non-small cell lung cancer, anaplastic lymphoma kinase, cystic brain metastases, crizotinib, neurocysticercosis

Loading Article Metrics ... Please wait

Related articles

Review: Lung cancer patients have the highest malignancy-associated suicide rate in USA: a population-based analysis

Abstract | Full Article | PDF Published: 16 Aug 2018 / https://doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2018.859

Case Report: Recurrent dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: challenging a surgeon’s dexterity for the ‘tricky’ margins

Abstract | Full Article | PDF Published: 13 Aug 2018 / https://doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2018.858

Policy: The understanding of healthcare workers on the content of palliative care policy in Shesilweni Swaziland: a qualitative study

Abstract | Full Article | PDF Published: 10 Aug 2018 / https://doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2018.857

Case Report: Two cases of white globe appearance in non-cancerous stomach

Abstract | Full Article | PDF Published: 07 Aug 2018 / https://doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2018.856

Research: Survival probabilities and trends for lip, oral cavity and oropharynx cancers in the Northern Region of Portugal in the period 2000–2009

Abstract | Full Article | PDF Published: 31 Jul 2018 / https://doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2018.855

Founding partners

European Cancer Organisation European Institute of Oncology

Founding Charities

Foundazione Umberto Veronesi Fondazione IEO Swiss Bridge

Published by

ecancer Global Foundation