Impact of cancer awareness campaigns in Peru: a 5-year Google Trends analysis

Jorge Luna-Abanto1,3,a, Luis Gamarra2,b, Darwin Desposorio Armestar3,c, Benjamin Huamanchau Condori4,d, Grivette Betsy Mendoza Tisoc5,e, Gustavo Flores Trujillo6,f, Elily Apumayta3,g, Tessy Tairo-Cerrón7,h, Cesar Centurión-Rodríguez8,i, Luis García Ruiz3,9,j, Jossué Espinoza-Figueroa10,k, Karoll Tatiana Meza Garcia4,l, Jorge Navarro Yovera4,m, Milward Ubillús Trujillo1,11,n and Gustavo Sarria1,11,o

1Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas, Av. Angamos Este 2520, Lima 15000, Perú

2Departamento de Radioterapia, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas, Av. Angamos Este 2520, Lima 15000, Perú

3Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima 15102, Perú

4Universidad de San Martín de Porres, Lima 15011, Perú

5Servicio de Anatomía Patológica, Hospital Antonio Lorena, Cusco 08001, Perú

6Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego, Trujillo 13008, Perú

7Departamento de Medicina Nuclear, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas, Av. Angamos Este 2520, Lima 15000, Perú

8Departamento de Medicina Oncológica, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas, Av. Angamos Este 2520, Lima 15000, Perú

9Departamento de Medicina Crítica, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas, Av. Angamos Este 2520, Lima 15000, Perú

10Departamento de Radiodiagnóstico, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas, Av. Angamos Este 2520, Lima 15000, Perú

11Universidad de Huánuco, Huánuco 10001, Perú

















Background: The aim of this research was to characterise the interest on the most frequent cancers in Peru through Google Trends, its geographic and temporal relationship with massive awareness campaigns.

Methods: A temporal trends analysis for the last 5 years was carried out, comparing the Relative Search Volume (RSV) with the dates of mass cancer awareness campaigns in Peru. Google Trends application was used to evaluate the interest in the topics: breast, prostate, cervical stomach and colorectal cancer between 1 January 2016 and 31 December 2020, expressed in RSV. The annual RSV for each neoplasm was compared, as well as its annual variation using the Kruskal–Wallis test. The correlation between the RSV and the estimated incidence for each province was measured using the Spearman test.

Results: The topics with the highest RSV were breast (median: 20, range: 6–100) and prostate cancer (median: 28, range: 9–48). The topic ‘breast cancer’ showed a cyclical punctual increase in October, its awareness month. Searches for cervical, stomach and colorectal cancer were smaller and did not show peaks of interest. It was observed that the RSV was variable when compared with previous years (p < 0.05 for all the evaluated topics). Geographically, different provincial configurations of interest were observed according to neoplasia. When correlating the RSV with the incidence by province, a non-significant positive correlation (p > 0.05) was found for breast, cervical and colorectal cancer.

Conclusions: This study suggests a positive temporal correlation between RSV and awareness cancer campaigns in Peru specially to breast cancer and, to a lesser extent, prostate cancer. Significant variations of interest were demonstrated for each neoplasm among the evaluated years. No significant correlation was found between the incidence rate and the average RSV among Peruvian provinces.

Keywords: cancer awareness, Google Trends, cancer trends, Peru

Correspondence to: Jorge Luna-Abanto

Published: 24/11/2022
Received: 15/03/2022

Publication costs for this article were supported by ecancer (UK Charity number 1176307).

Copyright: © the authors; licensee ecancermedicalscience. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


In 2018, 17 million new cases of cancer were diagnosed and 9.6 million people died from this cause [1]. By 2040, it is projected that these rates will increase fundamentally due to the growth and ageing of the world population, especially in Latin America where this demographic process is just beginning [13]. Globally lung, prostate, colorectal, stomach and liver cancer are the most common among men; while breast, colorectal, lung, cervical and thyroid cancer are in women [1, 3, 4]. In Peru, 69,849 new cases of cancer were reported during 2020 and there were 34,976 deaths [5]. In Peru, the cancers with the highest incidence and mortality for men were prostate cancer, gastric cancer and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma; on the other hand, a higher incidence of cervical, breast and stomach cancer was reported in women [6].

The most widespread mass prevention and promotion campaigns on cancer are ‘pink October’ for breast cancer and ‘blue November’ for prostate cancer [2, 7], whose aim is to raise awareness on the importance of screening, early diagnosis and treatment of cancer; however, some authors have questioned the impact of these interventions [2]. According to the ‘National Comprehensive Cancer Care Plan of Peru’, screening activities include for cervical cancer: visual inspection with acetic acid, detection of human papillomavirus (HPV) through molecular testing and cervico-vaginal cytology; for breast cancer: clinical breast examination and mammography; for colorectal cancer: detection of occult blood in faeces and lower gastrointestinal endoscopy; for prostate cancer: dosage of prostate-specific antigen and digital rectal examination; and for non-screening neoplasms (such as stomach cancer), the activities are aimed at strengthening the capacities of the first level of care for the referral of suspicious cases [8].

The Google search engine has become the first and most popular source of information, and the search volume indicator could be considered a measurable unit to evaluate the interest, and indirectly the impact of cancer awareness campaigns in a viable, fast and economical way [2, 9]. There has been an increase in Internet access in Peru, from 19.8% to 76.2% between 2012 and 2019, according to the results of the residential survey of telecommunications services [10]. In this context, this research used the Google Trends application to correlate the Relative Search Volume (RSV) with the dates of cancer awareness campaigns carried out in Peru and to infer the power of the intervention. While increasing RSV is not the ultimate goal of health awareness campaigns, there is an increasing evidence of the use of the Internet, expressed in higher RSV rates, as an important platform and tool for the dissemination and implementation of public health policies [11].


An ecological study of temporal trends was carried out on the chosen search engine, the temporal relationship between mass cancer awareness campaigns in Peru and the RSV was evaluated to establish a probable effect. The five most common neoplasms in Peru were identified according to The Global Cancer Observatory (GLOBOCAN) 2020: breast, prostate, cervical stomach and colorectal. The Google Trends application was used to obtain the weekly RSV between 1 January 2016 and 31 December 2020. The dates of the official calendar from the Peruvian Ministry of Health were taken into account, as well as the main worldwide awareness campaigns for the selected neoplasms [12].

Google Trends is a tool used to study trends and patterns of search engine queries using Google; it expresses the absolute number of searches relative to the total number of searches in each location and at each time [13]. In this application, the number of searches for each topic relative to total searches is referred to as the query share, then it is normalised to the highest volume of searches for that term over the time period being studied; this index ranges from 0 to 100, with 100 recorded on the date that saw the highest RSV activity for that term [13]. The chosen search topics were: ‘cáncer de mama’, ‘cáncer de próstata’, ‘cáncer de cérvix’, ‘cáncer de estómago’ and ‘cáncer colorrectal’. A temporal graph was made to assess the variation of the RSV according to the search topic, independently and comparatively.

The medians of RSV were compared, and the differences among groups were analysed according to the year evaluated with the non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis test. If differences were found, the Games–Howell post hoc test was performed to identify the difference in means and its directionality. Both statistical tests were considered significant if p < 0.05. Heat maps were made to plot the RSV by regions using the ‘R’ program. The correlation between the RSV and the incidence rate for the neoplasms evaluated by each region was evaluated by calculating Spearman’s Rho.

For statistical purpose, we assumed that the distribution of age groups was similar between regions, and the incidence rate was calculated directly from the official reported cases found at the 2018 national situational analysis of cancer. The estimated population by sex at 30 June 2016, was obtained from the National Institute of Statistics and Informatics. This study followed the current regulations regarding the ethical management of secondary data established by the The Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS) standards. In this sense, approval by the institutional ethics committee was not requested.


From 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2020, the search topics with the highest RSV were ‘breast cancer’ and ‘prostate cancer’. Only the topic ‘breast cancer’ showed a trend associated with cyclical peaks of interest in October; out of these, the interest in the other topics was lower. The median RSV for breast cancer was 20 with a range of 6–100. The RSV for the topic ‘prostate cancer’ showed a greater global interest than the topic ‘breast cancer’ with a median of 28 (range: 9–48). The trend graph for ‘prostate cancer’ was characterised by little variability and no search peaks, but a higher overall average interest.

The search topics ‘cervical cancer’, ‘stomach cancer’ and ‘colorectal cancer’ had a lower RSV, they had a maximum score below 26 points. No temporal trends were found for these topics in the study period. Median RSV values were 12 (range: 0–26), 12 (range: 0–24) and 5 (range: 0–9) for the topics ‘cervical cancer’, ‘stomach cancer’ and ‘colorectal cancer’, respectively.

When comparing the annual RSV between each neoplasm, a significant difference was found using the Kruskal-Wallis test. with H: 16,997 (p: 0.02), 15,116 (p: 0.04), 20,040 (p: 0.00), 14,552 (p: 0.006), 32,252 (p: 0.00) for ‘cancer’ subjects breast’, ‘prostate cancer”, “cervical cancer”, “stomach cancer” and “colorectal cancer”, respectively (Figure 1). When analysing these differences with the Games–Howell test, a greater interest was observed for the topic ‘breast cancer’ during 2019 compared to other years. However, this difference was only significant for the years 2016 (mean difference: 7.35; p: 0.018) and 2017 (mean difference: 7.74; p: 0.015). The interest in prostate cancer was greater during 2019 when compared to the years 2016 and 2017 with a mean difference of 4.02 (p: 0.034) and 4.59 (p: 0.012). In 2020, the interest for this neoplasm was higher than that observed in 2017 (mean difference: 3.94; p: 0.044).

Searches for the topic ‘cervical cancer’ decreased for 2020, when compared to the previous year’s 2016 (mean difference: −2.52; p: 0.042), 2017 (mean difference: −1.86; p: 0.230), 2018 (mean difference: −3.02; p: 0.014), 2019 (mean difference: −3.96; p: 0.001). Interest in ‘stomach cancer’ increased significantly for the years 2018 (mean difference: 2.85; p: 0.017) and 2019 (mean difference: 2.79 p: 0.023) compared to 2016. However, for 2020, a non-significant decrease in RSV was reported compared to the previous year. When analysing the RSV for colorectal cancer, a sustained decrease was observed until 2018. During 2019, an increase in interest was reported with respect to the years 2017 (mean difference: 2.23; p: 0.003) and 2018 (mean difference: 2.62; p: 0.00); no variations were found for 2020.

The RSV by topic was variable depending on the geography, and various groups of provinces had greater interest in certain neoplasms. It was observed that the interest on ‘breast cancer’ was greater in the northwestern regions of the country (Lambayeque, Tumbes, Cajamarca and La Libertad). On the other hand, the provinces with less interest were located in the southeast of the country. The RSV for ‘prostate cancer’ was higher in coastal North West provinces (La Libertad, Cajamarca, Áncash); however, the province with the greatest interest in the subject was Loreto, located in the Peruvian jungle. Similarly, the distribution of interest for ‘cervical cancer’ was higher in Loreto followed by Huánuco, a central highland province, and with less interest in the coast. The distribution of interest in the topics ‘stomach cancer’ and ‘colorectal cancer’ predominated in the coastal provinces and, in the case of the former, with a certain tendency towards the central highlands. A positive correlation was found for interest in breast cancer (Rho: 0.388; p: 0.055), cervical (Rho: 0.098; p: 0.640) and colorectal (Rho: 0.386; p: 0.056); however, they were not significant (Figure 2).

Figure 1. The 5-years RSV trend for (a) breast, (b) prostate, (c) cervical, (d) gastric and (e) colorectal cancer. The grey bar shows the dates of national awareness campaigns for each neoplasm.


Breast cancer

The RSV for the topic ‘breast cancer’ was one of the highest and showed cyclical increases in October of each year (median: 20, range: 6–100). Similar behaviour of interest in this neoplasm was reported by Quintanilha et al [2] and Vasconcellos-Silva et al [14] who evaluated it in Brazil, same results were reported in Finland, the United States and Malaysia coinciding with October on a cyclical basis [4, 15, 16]. The most popular awareness campaign for breast cancer is ‘pink October’, which correlates with the specific increases observed in this study [17]. In Peru, the ‘Pink Day’ was established within the third week of October ‘Peru against Cancer’ campaign [1820]. It was observed that the RSV of breast cancer increased significantly towards 2019; however, by 2020, the interest decreased probably with the increasing interest on the COVID-19 pandemic, which suggests that interest could be modified by temporary events.

The provinces of Tumbes, Lambayeque, Cajamarca, and La Libertad had the highest RSV values in this period. According to the situational analysis of cancer in Peru, the northwestern region reported the highest incidence rates for this neoplasm [21]. The correlation between RSV and the incidence of breast cancer was positive, but non-significant (Rho: 0.388; p: 0.055). On the other hand, a recent epidemiological study found a higher mortality rate from breast cancer in coastal provinces; this epidemiological profile could be related to the greater interest in this specific population [22] Figure 1(a) and Figure 2(a).

Figure 2. (a)– (e): Heat map of Peru, distributed by provinces according to the RSV for each topic. (a): breast cancer, (b): prostate cancer, (c): cervical cancer, (d): gastric cancer and (e): colorectal cancer.

Prostate cancer

The topic ‘prostate cancer’ did not show cyclical increases in RSV (median: 28, range 9–48). Khan et al [23] found no association between ‘Movember’ and the RSV for prostate cancer between 2004 and 2015. Patel et al [24] also observed a non-significant increase in interest in prostate cancer, although there was a slight increase of 4.1% in November searches. Prostate cancer prevention campaigns date back to 2003, when ‘Blue November’ and ‘Prostate Cancer Awareness Month’ were established in November and September, respectively [24]. In 2012, international recommendations shifted towards less use of prostate-specific antigen, which probably temporarily influenced the messages of awareness campaigns [25]. In contrast, a tendency to minimise the risk of prostate cancer has been reported among patients due to the absence of symptoms in the early stages of the disease, which could be related to the low RSV compared to other neoplasms [24].

Historically, in Peru, there were no mass screening campaigns and cases of advanced prostate cancer are frequent [26]; however, in recent years, November has been promoted as the ‘international month against prostate cancer’ [27, 28]. The median interest in this neoplasm was higher than that observed for breast cancer, and it increased consistently until 2019 to remain unchanged towards 2020 (p: 0.044). The difference with breast cancer could be related to a slow-progressing disease, an asymptomatic natural history in the early stages and influenced by other circumstantial factors [26]. The provinces with the highest RSV for prostate cancer were Loreto, La Libertad and Cajamarca. No correlation was found when comparing the interest on prostate cancer with the estimated incidence and mortality from 2014 to 2018 [21, 29] Figure 1(b) and Figure 2(b).

Cervical cancer

The trend for cervical cancer interest remained stable and without peaks in the last 5 years, this would be related to the lack of campaigns focused on specific dates, age and cultural groups. Another hypothesis is that Peruvian awareness campaigns are scarce and with no month predilection, in congruence with public policies [3032]. In the US, a study reported that for January, the interest on cervical cancer was significantly higher than the rest of the year (RSV: 69), in relation to the awareness month in this country [33]. On the contrary, in Peru, a sustained decrease in RSV was observed for this neoplasm in 2020 when compared to previous years. This could be related to a ‘pandemic effect’, precarious Internet access of the affected population and the lack of explicit awareness campaigns targeting the population of interest [9]. The RSV of cervical cancer was higher in the eastern and central provinces such as Loreto, Junín, Lambayeque, La Libertad and Cajamarca. The mortality rate due to this neoplasm during the period 2000–2011 was predominant in the departments of Ucayali, Loreto, Madre de Dios, Huánuco, San Martín, Amazonas, Pasco, Tacna and La Libertad with rates above the average [33]. Despite this, no significant correlation was found between the incidence rate and RSV (Rho: 0.098; p: 0.640). Incidence and mortality studies revealed that these rates have remained in the first places for the evaluated regions, while they decreased in metropolitan Lima [34, 35], this could be related to the access to health and Internet. Cervical cancer continues to be one of the main causes of morbidity and mortality in Peru, in this sense it would be valid to consider an awareness strategy targeting women in high prevalence areas, using digital media, which have shown to increase interest in cervical cancer knowledge and prevention [8, 3638] Figure 1(c) and Figure 2(c).

Gastric cancer

Although gastric cancer is one of the most frequent and deadly cancers in Peru, interest in this topic was low in the last years (median RSV: 12, range: 0–24). In this research, the interest in this neoplasm increased significantly towards 2019 (p: 0.017), to remain stable in 2020 despite having lower RSV than the previous neoplasms. The implementation of massive campaigns aimed at raising awareness and preventing this neoplasm is scarce and controversial, although some countries have instituted November for its promotion [39]. To date, the only country that maintains a screening and awareness programme is Japan, where gastric cancer is currently the fifth in incidence and fourth in mortality [4042]. In the UK, a pilot oesophagogastric cancer awareness campaign was conducted; during this period, the number of referrals for endoscopy increased by 52% in the exposed geographic areas [43, 44]. But, despite having achieved the communication of an early detection message, some experts maintain that, due to the non-specificity of the symptoms associated with this neoplasm, this campaign could have led to an increase in endoscopies performed, without necessarily being associated with a higher rate of cancer detection, increased costs and waiting time [40].

Another factor that could influence the interest on gastric cancer is the low level of knowledge of the population, a Chinese study and another Peruvian study concluded that the general population has a low to medium level of awareness on the topic [45, 46]. The coastal provinces: La Libertad, Lambayeque, Sierra: Áncash, Junín and Huánuco had higher RSV for this search topic, which could be related to the fact that these regions correspond to the areas with the highest incidence and mortality from gastric cancer in recent years, a fact that has been associated with social determinants of health such as: poverty, sanitation and exposure to other risk factors [4749]. The correlation between incidence and RSV was not statistically significant. This may be due to the cross-sectional nature of this analysis, despite the geographical relationship being clear in the heat map Figure 1(d) and Figure 2(d).

Colorectal cancer

The interest on colorectal cancer was low (RSV: 5, range: 0–9), with no peaks of interest in the last 5 years. The main awareness campaigns on this neoplasm take place in March, other researchers have shown that these have a positive impact on the population’s interest in the neoplasm; however, this did not translate into a greater number of colonoscopies performed [50, 51]. In contrast, a Brazilian study did not find peaks of interest in the topic and a clear polarisation of interest between its regions [2]. Other American studies failed to identify cyclical peaks in relation to awareness campaigns either, this information is comparable to our findings [4, 9]. In Peru, a significant increase in RSV was observed towards 2019–2020, and its correlation with incidence rates was positive but not significant. Between 2014 and 2018, colorectal cancer was the fifth most frequent neoplasm in Lambayeque, Cajamarca and Callao; and the sixth in La Libertad and Ancash, these being the departments with the highest RSV on the subject [21]. The little interest in this neoplasm could be attributed to various factors, including its relative infrequency compared to others, a more latent clinic in its initial stages or the lack of massive campaigns. Another factor could be related to the lack of well-known Peruvians who suffer from this neoplasm, as observed with the actor Chadwick Boseman who, after his death from colorectal cancer was confirmed, an increase in interest in this neoplasm was observed among African-Americans [52] Figure 1(e) and Figure 2(e).

Geography and internet access

Peru has three geographic regions: the coast, the highlands and the Jungle, and it is accompanied by differences in language and Internet access. According to the National Institute of Statistics and Informatics, the percentage of the population that made use of Internet between 2016 and 2020 increased 18.6% (from 57.6% to 76.2%) on the coast, 19.4% (from 31.4% to 50.8%) in the highlands and 18.3% (from 27.5% to 45.8%) in the jungle [53]. Internet access in the last 5 years has increased to a greater extent in the population with lower socioeconomic and educational levels. Thus, in urban areas, the population with elementary education (or lower) has increased its access by 17.9% (from 26.9% to 44.8%) as opposed to the population with higher university education, which increased by 6% (from 89.5% to 95.7%); and in rural areas, the population with elementary education (or lower) has increased its access by 16% (from 3% to 19%) slightly more than the population with higher education, which increased by 14.3% (from 73.5% to 87.8%) [53]. All this could explain the differences in RSV between the different Peruvian provinces.

Limitations and implications

The main limitations of this study include the non-inclusion of other search engines and the possible existence of some systematic error in the Google Trends algorithm, that were not accessible [4]. Other limitations include poor Internet access in some provinces which are most affected by certain neoplasms, as well as the influence of events related to celebrities, seasonal influence that could be linked specially to breast cancer and the age of the users who perform searches, which were not evaluated in this research. On the other hand, the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic could be associated with a decrease of interest in neoplasms and their early detection [54]. The use of the Internet and social networks is not exempt of risks, a concerning rise on misinformation has been reported leading to confusion and risking the patient’s health; however, this variable was not studied in the present research [55].


In conclusion, a positive temporal correlation was observed between the interest on breast cancer and awareness campaigns; this temporal correlation was lower in prostate cancer but showed a higher median RSV. Significant variation was found in the interest in the neoplasms evaluated in the period of study, with significant increases in all except ‘cervical cancer’. Despite the fact that cervical cancer is one of the main neoplasms in Peru, the little interest of the population is striking because it would be important to stratify the campaigns aimed at this neoplasm. Cancer incidence in certain regions was geographically related to higher RSV as in the case of breast, cervical and colorectal cancer. Monitoring the RSV using Google Trends could help to identify populations’ interests in cancer screening and may complement traditional data collection about public health awareness programmes.



Authors’ contributions

Jorge Luna-Abanto conceived of the idea of an article on this topic and developed it. Jorge Luna-Abanto and Luis Gamarra wrote the article and created the graphics. All authors discussed the review and contributed to the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.

Funding information

The authors received no specific funding for this work.

Conflicts of interest



1. American Cancer Society (2020) Global cancer facts & figures [Internet] [] Date accessed: 14/08/20

2. Quintanilha LF, Souza LN, and Sanches D, et al (2019) The impact of cancer campaigns in Brazil: a Google Trends analysis Ecancermedicalscience [Internet] 13 Date accessed: 16/12/20 PMID: 31645890 PMCID: 6786828

3. World Health Organization (2020) Cancer [Internet] [] Date accessed: 16/12/20

4. Phillips CA, Barz Leahy A, and Li Y, et al (2018) Relationship between state-level Google online search volume and cancer incidence in the United States: retrospective study J Med Internet Res [Internet] 20(1) [] Date accessed: 16/12/20

5. Sung H, Ferlay J, and Siegel RL, et al (2021) Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries CA Cancer J Clin 71 209–249 PMID: 33538338

6. Cancer Today [Internet] [] Date accessed: 16/12/20

7. Havelka EM, Mallen CD, and Shepherd TA (2020) Using Google Trends to assess the impact of global public health days on online health information seeking behaviour in Central and South America J Glob Health [Internet] 10(1) [] Date accessed: 16/12/20 PMID: 32373327 PMCID: 7182390

8. Ministerio de Salud del Perú (2021) Plan Nacional de cuidados integrales del cáncer (2020 – 2024). Dirección General de Intervenciones Estratégicas en Salud Pública (Lima: Dirección Ejecutiva de Prevención y Control de Cáncer – Lima, Ministerio de Salud)

9. Kaleem T, Malouff TD, and Stross WC, et al (2019) Google search trends in oncology and the impact of celebrity cancer awareness Cureus [Internet] 11(8) [] Date accessed: 16/12/20 PMID: 31608195 PMCID: 6783227

10. Servicios Editoriales S. A. EDITORA PERÚ EP (2021) Más de 7 millones de hogares peruanos tienen acceso a internet, según Osiptel [Internet] [] Date accessed: 17/01/21

11. Xu S, Markson C, and Costello KL, et al (2016) Leveraging social media to promote public health knowledge: example of cancer awareness via Twitter JMIR Public Health Surveill 2(1) e5205

12. Ministerio de Salud (2022) Fechas conmemorativas [Internet] [] Date accessed: 22/08/21

13. Arora VS, McKee M, and Stuckler D (2019) Google Trends: opportunities and limitations in health and health policy research Health Policy 123(3) 338–341 PMID: 30660346

14. Vasconcellos-Silva PR, Carvalho DBF, and Trajano V, et al (2017) Using Google Trends data to study public interest in breast cancer screening in Brazil: why not a pink February? JMIR Public Health Surveill [Internet] 3(2) [] Date accessed: 06/03/21 PMID: 28385679 PMCID: 5399222

15. Kluger N and Bouchard LJ (2019) A comparative study of Google search trends for melanoma, breast cancer and prostate cancer in Finland Dermatology [Internet] 235(4) [] Date accessed: 06/03/21

16. Mohamad M and Kok HS (2019) Using Google Trends data to study public interest in breast cancer screening in Malaysia Asian Pac J Cancer Prev [Internet] 20(5) [] Date accessed: 06/03/21 PMID: 31127903 PMCID: 6857874

17. WHO (2012) Breast cancer awareness month in October [] Date accessed: 07/03/21

18. Minsa se “viste de rosa” para prevenir el cáncer de mama [Internet] [] Date accessed: 07/03/21

19. Semana Perú contra el cáncer [Internet] [] Date accessed: 07/03/21

20. Matsumoto MM, Widemon S, and Farfán G, et al (2020) Earlier breast cancer detection in Peru: establishing a comprehensive program in an underserved region J Am Coll Radiol [Internet] 17(11) 1520 [] Date accessed: 07/03/21 PMID: 32645288 PMCID: 7338027

21. Centro Nacional de Epidemiología, Prevención y Control de Enfermedades Ministerio de Salud (2020) Análisis de la situación del Cáncer en el Perú, 2018 [Internet] [] Date accessed: 10/01/21

22. Smith Torres-Roman J, Martinez-Herrera JF, and Carioli G, et al (2020) Breast cancer mortality trends in Peruvian women BMC Cancer [Internet] 20 [] Date accessed: 06/03/21 PMID: 33261561 PMCID: 7706041

23. Khan JS, Papa NP, and Davis NF, et al (2020) Is movember synonymous with moustaches or men’s health? An examination of internet search activity for prostate and testicular cancer during the campaign Ir J Med Sci [Internet] 189(3) [] Date accessed: 10/01/21

24. Patel MS, Halpern JA, and Desai AS, et al (2020) Success of prostate and testicular cancer awareness campaigns compared to breast cancer awareness month according to internet search volumes: a Google Trends analysis Urology [Internet] 139 [] Date accessed: 10/01/21

25. Zevallos Santillan E and Villcas Vargas R (2016) Cribado oportunista, estrategia de prevención primaria y secundaria contra el cáncer de próstata en Lima-Perú Rev Med Hered [Internet] 27(3) 190–192 [] Date accessed: 10/04/21

26. Pow-Sang M and Huamán MA (2013) Retos para el diagnóstico precoz del cáncer de próstata en el Perú Rev Peru Med Exp Salud Publica [Internet] 30(1) 124–128 [] Date accessed: 09/04/21 PMID: 23612825

27. INEN ilumina su fachada de azul por el mes internacional de la lucha contra el cáncer de próstata [Internet] [] Date accessed: 10/04/21

28. Cáncer de próstata es la neoplasia maligna más frecuente en varones [Internet] [] Date accessed: 10/04/21

29. Torres-Roman JS, Ruiz EF, and Martinez-Herrera JF, et al (2019) Prostate cancer mortality rates in Peru and its geographical regions BJU Int [Internet] 123(4) [] Date accessed: 10/04/21

30. Vacuna a tu hija contra el Cáncer de Cuello Uterino [Internet] [] Date accessed: 17/01/21

31. Sanchez JD (2021) Cervical Cancer Prevention in Peru: Lessons Learned from the TATI Demonstration Project [Internet] [] Date accessed: 17/01/21

32. Plan nacional de prevención y control de cáncer de cuello uterino 2017–2021 [Internet] [] Date accessed: 17/01/21

33. Cohen SA, Cohen LE, and Tijerina JD (2020) The impact of monthly campaigns and other high-profile media coverage on public interest in 13 malignancies: a Google Trends analysis Ecancermedicalscience [Internet] 14 [] Date accessed: 10/04/21

34. High cervix cancer mortality rates in Peruvian rainforest [Internet] [] Date accessed: 17/01/21

35. Luna-Abanto J, Ruiz LG, and Laura-Martinez J, et al (2020) Cancer incidence and mortality trends in young adults in Metropolitan Lima young adults, 1990-2012 Ecancermedicalscience [Internet] 14 [] Date accessed: 17/01/21

36. Lenoir P, Moulahi B, and Azé J, et al (2017) Raising awareness about cervical cancer using Twitter: content analysis of the 2015 #SmearForSmear Campaign J Med Internet Res [Internet] 19(10) [] Date accessed: 17/01/21 PMID: 29038096 PMCID: 5662788

37. Lin W, Wang Y, and Liu Z, et al (2020) Inequalities in awareness and attitude towards HPV and its vaccine between local and migrant residents who participated in cervical cancer screening in Shenzhen, China Cancer Res Treat [Internet] 52(1) [] Date accessed: 17/01/21

38. Ifediora CO (2019) Re-thinking breast and cervical cancer preventive campaigns in developing countries: the case for interventions at high schools BMC Public Health [Internet] 19 [] Date accessed: 17/01/21 PMID: 31053073 PMCID: 6500011

39. No Stomach For Cancer Admin (2020) Stomach cancer awareness month [Internet] [,and%20family%20during%20the%20holidays] Date accessed: 20/12/20

40. Koo S, Awadelkarim B, and Dhar A (2017) The national oesophagogastric cancer awareness campaign: a locality outcome analysis from County Durham Frontline Gastroenterol [Internet] 8(4) [] Date accessed: 19/12/20 PMID: 29067156 PMCID: 5641848

41. Iacobucci G (2015) New campaign to raise awareness of oesophago-gastric cancer may lead to over-investigation, expert warns BMJ [Internet] 350 [] Date accessed: 20/12/20

42. Cancer Today [Internet] [] Date accessed: 19/12/20

43. Oesophago-gastric cancers campaign (2014) [Internet] [] Date accessed: 20/12/20

44. Lai J, Mak V, and Bright CJ, et al (2021) Reviewing the impact of 11 national be clear on cancer public awareness campaigns, England, 2012 to 2016: a synthesis of published evaluation results Int J Cancer [Internet] 148(5) [] Date accessed: 17/01/21

45. Liu Q, Zeng X, and Wang W, et al (2019) Awareness of risk factors and warning symptoms and attitude towards gastric cancer screening among the general public in China: a cross-sectional study BMJ Open [Internet] 9(7) [] Date accessed: 20/12/20

46. Berrospi-Zavala M, Llocclla-Delgado SD, and Correa-López LE (2019) Factores asociados a conocimientos sobre prevención del cáncer gástrico en pacientes en un hospital de Lima – Perú, 2017 Rev Fac Med Hum [Internet] 19(2) 34–39 [] Date accessed: 10/04/21

47. Ruiz EF, Torres-Roman JS, and Servan SA, et al (2019) Trends and geographic pattern of stomach cancer mortality in Peru Cancer Epidemiol [Internet] 58 [] Date accessed: 20/12/20

48. Tirado-Hurtado I, Carlos C, and Lancho L, et al (2019) Helicobacter pylori: history and facts in Peru Crit Rev Oncol Hematol [Internet] 134 [] Date accessed: 17/01/21

49. Piñeros M, Ramos W, and Antoni S, et al (2017) Cancer patterns, trends, and transitions in Peru: a regional perspective Lancet Oncol [Internet] 18(10) [] Date accessed: 17/01/21 PMID: 28971824 PMCID: 5851445

50. Pantel HJ, Kleiman DA, and Kuhnen AH, et al (2021) Has national colorectal cancer awareness month increased endoscopy screening rates and public interest in colorectal cancer? Surg Endosc [Internet] 35(1) [] Date accessed: 10/01/21

51. Ling R and Lee J (2016) Disease monitoring and health campaign evaluation using Google search activities for HIV and AIDS, stroke, colorectal cancer, and marijuana use in Canada: a retrospective observational study JMIR Public Health Surveill [Internet] 2(2) [] Date accessed: 10/01/21 PMID: 27733330 PMCID: 5081479

52. Naik H, Johnson MDD, and Johnson MR (2021) Internet interest in colon cancer following the Death of Chadwick Boseman: infoveillance study J Med Internet Res [Internet] 23(6) [] Date accessed: 12/09/21 PMID: 34128824 PMCID: 8277405

53. Instituto Nacional de Estadística e Informática Encuesta Nacional de Hogares. Población de 6 y más años de edad que hace uso de internet, según ámbito geográfico, 2010–2020 (INEI)

54. Greiner B, Tipton S, and Nelson B, et al (2021) Cancer screenings during the COVID-19 pandemic: an analysis of public interest trends Curr Probl Cancer [Internet] [] Date accessed: 12/09/21

55. Johnson SB, Parsons M, and Dorff T, et al (2021) Cancer misinformation and harmful information on facebook and other social media: a brief report J Natl Cancer Inst [Internet]

Supplementary material

Supplementary Table S1. Population aged 6 and over using the Internet, according to language and geographic area, Peru: 2016–2020.

Related Articles

Funmilola Olanike Wuraola, Olalekan Olasehinde, Matteo Di Bernardo, Akinbolaji A Akinkuolie, Adewale O Adisa, Adewale A Aderounmu, Tajudeen O Mohammed, Oluwatosin Z Omoyiola, Thomas P Kingham, Olusegun I Alatise
Deevyashali Parekh, Vijay M Patil, Kavita Nawale, Vanita Noronha, Nandini Menon, Sucheta More, Supriya Goud, Srushti Jain, Vijayalakshmi Mathrudev, Zoya Peelay, Sachin Dhumal, Shweta Jogdhankar, Kumar Prabhash
Ana Teresa Vilares, Riccardo Ciabattoni, Teresa Margarida Cunha, Ana Félix
Caddie Laberiano-Fernández, Joan Moreno Luján, Bruno de Carvalho Dornelas, Magali Franco Benites, Patricia Gutiérrez Quispe, Valeria Aguilar Vásquez, Andric Guerrero Espinoza, Elsa Guerra Guerra, Gabriela Gil-Arroyo Álvarez, Juan Astigueta-Pérez, María Teresa García de Davila, Sandro Casavilca Zambrano, Tatiana Casavilca Zambrano, Alejandro Mariños, Emmanuel S González, Rossana Lazcano, Ricardo R Lastra, Isabel Alvarado-Cabrero, Henry Guerra Miller, Ricardo H Bardales, Milagros Abad-Licham
Table of Contents
Table of Contents