Funmilola Olanike Wuraola1*, Jenine Ramruthan2, Nneka Sunday-Nweke3, Olayide Sulaiman Agodirin4, Olusegun Isaac Alatise1, Matthew Castelo5, Andrea Covelli6, Anna Dare5, Sharif Folorunso1, Michelle Jacobson7, Saheed Lawal4, Ogechukwu Nwafor3, Olalekan Olasehinde1, Janet Papadakos8, Larissa Peck9, Emma Reel2, Danielle Rodin10, Emily Thain9, and Tulin D. Cil2,5
Department of Surgery, Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospital Complex, Ile Ife, Nigeria
Department of Surgery, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
Department of Surgery, Federal Teaching Hospital Abakaliki, Abakaliki, Nigeria
Department of Surgery, University of Ilorin, Ilorin, Nigeria
Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
Department of Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Canada
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Canada
Cancer Education Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
Department of Genetics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
Global Cancer Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
Breast cancer (BC) is a significant health challenge in Nigeria, characterized by early onset (15-39 years), late-stage diagnosis (>80% stage III/IV), and high prevalence of triple-negative BC (~40%). Overall survival is significantly worse compared to North America (43.6% vs 90%). Germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants (PVs) are reported in approximately 11% of Nigerian patients with BC, yet access to genetic testing and counselling remains extremely limited, underscoring a significant global disparity. This pilot study evaluated the feasibility and clinical utility of BRCA1/2 testing in Nigerian patients with BC.
In this prospective, observational study, newly diagnosed patients with invasive BC were enrolled across three tertiary hospitals representing the north-central, southwest, and southeast regions of Nigeria. Saliva samples were analyzed for BRCA1/2 variants through an international testing provider. Participants received pre- and post-test counselling, culturally tailored education, and clinical follow-up. Demographic and clinicopathological data were compared between BRCA carriers and noncarriers.
Among 100 participants (median age 43 years), 16% carried BRCA1/2 PVs, 4% had variants of uncertain significance and 80% tested negative. Clinicopathological features were comparable between carriers and noncarriers, including stage III/IV disease (88% vs 82%), triple-negative tumors (46% vs 38%), and premenopausal status (75% vs 69%). Metastatic disease was more frequent among carriers (44% vs 26%, p=0.20). Family history of cancer was significantly higher in BRCA carriers than in noncarriers (25% vs 3.6%, p=0.012). Genetic results informed management: among BRCA carriers, 50% underwent mastectomy (25% bilateral, 25% unilateral), while 25% underwent prophylactic bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy.
This study shows that hereditary genetic testing is feasible and clinically actionable in Nigeria, with 16% of patients harboring a BRCA1/2 PV and disclosure of results influencing surgical uptake. Family history was significantly higher among carriers, underscoring the potential for cascade testing to identify asymptomatic high-risk relatives as a strategy for community-level prevention.
Olasehinde O, Alatise O, Omisore A, Wuraola F, Odujoko O, Romanoff A, Akinkuolie A, Arowolo O, Adisa A, Knapp G, Famurewa O. Contemporary management of breast cancer in Nigeria: insights from an institutional database. International journal of cancer. 2021 Jun 15;148(12):2906-14.
Zheng Y, Walsh T, Gulsuner S, Casadei S, Lee MK, Ogundiran TO, Ademola A, Falusi AG, Adebamowo CA, Oluwasola AO, Adeoye A. Inherited breast cancer in Nigerian women. Journal of clinical oncology. 2018 Oct 1;36(28):2820-5.
We are an independent charity and are not backed by a large company or society. We raise every penny ourselves to improve the standards of cancer care through education. You can help us continue our work to address inequalities in cancer care by making a donation.
Any donation, however small, contributes directly towards the costs of creating and sharing free oncology education.
Together we can get better outcomes for patients by tackling global inequalities in access to the results of cancer research.
Thank you for your support.