Our website uses cookies to improve your on-site experience. By using the website, cookies are being used as described in our Policy Document
Warning: To log in you will need to enable cookies and reload the page (Policy Document)
My ePortfolio Register   

Abstract | Full HTML Article | PDF ecancer 13 905 / https://doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2019.905


The use of intravesical BCG in urothelial carcinoma of the bladder

Omar Alhunaidi1,2 and Alexandre R Zlotta1,3,4

1Department of Surgical Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Toronto and University Health Network, Toronto, ON M5G 1L7, Canada

2Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Al-Amiri Hospital, Kuwait City, PO Box 4077, Safat 13041, Kuwait

3Department of Surgery (Urology), Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON M5G 1X5, Canada

4Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON M5G 1X5, Canada

Correspondence to: Alexandre R Zlotta. Email: alexandre.zlotta@sinaihealthsystem.ca


The high recurrence and progression rates of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) have led investigators to study the use of intravesical therapy in order to prevent them. Bacillus Calmette–Guérin (BCG) has been successfully used for this indication to treat NMIBC for more than four decades.

BCG is the only intravesical agent shown to reduce the risk of progression of NMIBC to muscle-invasive disease. Despite over 40 years of clinical use, the precise mechanism of action for what has often been considered the most successful cancer immunotherapy in humans remains largely unknown.

Unfortunately, BCG therapy is not a universal panacea and it still fails in up to 40% of patients. Many of these patients, especially in the high-risk category (T1 high-grade disease, carcinoma in situ) will require aggressive therapy like cystectomy or in selected cases, bladder-sparing options like chemo-radiation. Indeed, there is no gold standard intravesical treatment after BCG failure.

Keywords: bladder cancer, bacillus Calmette–Guérin, non-muscle invasive bladder cancer, urothelial carcinoma, intravesical therapy

Copyright: © the authors; licensee ecancermedicalscience. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Published: 26/02/2019; Received: 13/09/2018

History of BCG

Bacillus Calmette–Guérin (BCG, Mycobacterium bovis) was first discovered as a vaccine against tuberculosis by French scientists Albert Calmette and Camille Guerin in 1921 at the Pasteur Institute in Lille, France and it was named after them [1]. Intrigued by the hypothesis of Pearl in 1929, that clinical tuberculosis may cause lower frequency of tumours in autopsy materials, in the 1950s, Old, Clark and Benacerraf observed that BCG also prevented the growth of experimental tumours [2].

Mathe et al [3] in 1969 showed that BCG has an effect against human leukaemia. Morton et al [4] in 1970 demonstrated that intralesional BCG has an effect against human melanoma. Zbar et al [5, 6] described the principal rules for adequate immunotherapy.

(a) Tumour burden must be small.

(b) Direct contact between BCG and tumour is essential.

(c) The dose of the immunising agent must be adequate.

(d) Tumours respond better when confined to the parent organ or, in case of metastases, when only in regional lymph nodes.

Bloomberg et al [7] in 1975 showed that local BCG causes strong inflammatory reactions in the healthy bladder of dogs. Morales in Canada was then the first to use BCG vaccine in the bladder for the treatment of recurrent non-muscle invasive (previously named ‘superficial’) bladder cancer (NMIBC) in 1976 [8]. He reported the use of this regimen on 10 patients (7 only eligible for analysis) with recurrent ‘superficial bladder cancer’. He instilled 120 mg of BCG (Frappier strain, Montreal) packaged in vials of 6, in 50 cc of saline via a urethral catheter into the bladder. The treatment regimen was weekly instillations intravesically of BCG for 6 weeks after initial intradermal injection of BCG to ‘prime’ patients. Morales noted that at least 3–6 weeks were needed to mount delayed hypersensitivity reaction and side effects lasted 1 week. Favourable outcomes on recurrence were reported in this very limited series [8].

In 1980, Lamm and colleagues completed the first randomised controlled trial proving the clinical effect of BCG on NMIBC [9]. In 1982, Brosman et al [10] modified the Morales intravesical BCG regimen and discontinued the intradermal injections. BCG was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 1990 for the treatment of carcinoma in situ (CIS) of the bladder [11].

Mechanism of action

The mechanism of action of BCG is very complex. In a nutshell, it is likely that BCG antitumor immunotherapy is the result of the immune response initially aimed at clearing the foreign pathogen instilled in the bladder. The end result is an activated immune response that is needed to combat the attenuated mycobacteria which are necessary to target tumour cells [1215].

Our own work and a review by Redelman-Sidi et al [16] briefly summarise the different steps [17]. The first step is the control against mycobacteria and the second step is the control against tumour cells. BCG first needs to attach to the urothelium through Fibronectin and Integrins. The Antigen 85 complex of mycobacteria, including BCG, plays a central role in synthesising major components of the inner and outer leaflets of the mycobacterial outer membrane and binds Fibronectin. BCG attaches to the urothelium through Fibronectin [17, 18]. BCG is then internalised by urothelial cells and captured by the first line of innate immune response cells. Antigen presentation and cytokine release result in major histocompatibility complex (MHC) II upregulation and of IL-6, Il-8 and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF). Immune cells are then recruited to the ‘war zone,’ including granulocytes, CD4 and CD8 T cells, natural killer (NK) cells and macrophages. A torrent of mainly TH-1 cytokines, including Interferon gamma, IL-1, IL-12, IL-18, IL-23 and tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha are produced by these immune cells.

This response is mainly non-specific although we have shown that a major increase in the lymphoproliferative response against purified protein derivative, Antigen 85. BCG culture filtrate and whole BCG can be observed in the peripheral blood of patients with NMIBC treated with BCG, suggesting specific immune responses against numerous BCG subfractions [17]. Local immune responses are exemplified by the granulomas, which can be observed in the bladder wall of patients treated with BCG.

Bladder tumour cell killing involves an immune-mediated cytotoxicity, including NK cells, NK T cells, CD8 T cells, macrophages and TRAIL (granulocytes) among many others. We have previously investigated the immunologically active components of BCG in the therapy of bladder cancer [19]. We observed that numerous BCG subcomponents, including BCG cell wall, plasma membrane, cytosol, purified polysaccharides as glucan or arabinomannan, purified native proteins from BCG culture filtrate, phosphate transporter PstS-2 and -3 proteins provide positive stimuli for Th1 cell differentiation and enhance the cytotoxicity against bladder tumour cells.

As redundancy is a keyword in biology, it seems that the immunological complexity of live attenuated mycobacteria is necessary to trigger the avalanche of immune responses required to clear and control tumour cells locally in the bladder. Response to BCG therapy, or the absence of response, is driven by a multitude of parameters. One of the most common strategies is the activation of innate immune pathways.

Toll-like receptor (TLR) pathways are of particular interest in cancer immunotherapy. TLRs are a family of receptors that bind to common components of many pathogens, as well as signals released by damaged cells. TLRs are expressed on many innate immune cells, including dendritic cells. Dendritic cells, the most potent of all antigen presenting cells, play a pivotal role in bridging the innate and adaptive responses. Thus, targeting dendritic cell TLRs is a common strategy for enhancing adaptive immune responses. TLRs are also present on a large portion of bladder tumours where higher TLR expression is correlated with less invasive tumours and expression levels of this important receptor may drive antitumor response [20]. Some individuals show a higher level of natural resistance than others to infection with certain intracellular pathogens, including BCG.

The well-known gene encoding natural resistance-associated protein 1 (NRAMP 1) exists in two allelic forms, differing by a point mutation. Polymorphisms in NRAMP1 and hGPX1gene to BCG have resulted in decreased cancer-specific survival (CSS) for the NRAMP1 D543N G:G genotype, as well as reduced recurrence-free survival (RFS) and increased risk of recurrence post-BCG [21].

BCG strains: is there a difference?

There have been several strains of BCG developed since the original strain in 1921, but whether these strains have varying efficacies on bladder tumours remain unclear. While hundreds of thousands of patients have been treated with BCG for prevention of NMIBC, no clinical difference has been shown among studies despite the use of various strains worldwide.

Trials using various strains have consistently demonstrated the efficacy of BCG immunotherapy in reducing recurrence and progression of NMBIC in all countries across the globe. BCG is recommended by all scientific associations from the European Association of Urology (EAU), American Urological Association, Japanese Association or the Canadian Urological Association.

Sengiku and colleagues demonstrated no significant difference between the studied strains [22]. Supporting a previous European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) meta-analysis which suggested that there is no large difference between different strains [23], a recent meta-analysis of randomised trials performed by Quan et al [24] concluded that no meaningful correlations between BCG strain and other survival outcomes (RFS, CSS and overall survival) could be drawn. Another systematic review and meta-analysis by Chou et al [25] concluded that no comment can be made regarding differences among strains. Gan et al [26] studied the effects of substrain differences in BCG immunotherapy for bladder cancer and came to a similar conclusion.

The only randomised study to have suggested some differences between different BCG strains was reported by Rentsch et al [27], who compared the clinical efficacy, immunogenicity and genetics of the BCG Connaught and Tice strains. Treatment with BCG Connaught conferred significantly greater 5-year RFS compared with treatment with BCG Tice (p = 0.0108). No statistically significant difference was observed for progression-free survival. Despite being randomised, this study had some limitations. For instance, an uneven number of patients were included in each arm despite a relatively small number of patients overall [27].

Interestingly enough, a vaccination for tuberculosis, which affects billions of humans worldwide and has been extensively studied, has shown significant differences in the immune response induced by different BCG vaccine strains from animal and human studies. The key question remains whether these differences in vitro translate to differences in protective efficacy against tuberculosis in humans, as well as in bladder cancer patients. What must be kept in mind is that the doses for vaccination and intravesical therapy are dramatically different [28].

Intravesical BCG dose and schedule

To obtain the standard dose, the BCG vaccine powdered vial is usually diluted into 50 ml of normal saline. The diluted BCG is then infused into the bladder through a urethral catheter after complete drainage of the bladder. It should be maintained in the bladder for 2 hours. BCG is administered for 2 to 4 weeks after resection to prevent the risk of systemic toxicity [29]. The schedule of intravesical BCG treatment comprises an induction course (6 weekly treatments) and a maintenance course [8, 30].

We have previously shown that in most patients, the maximal peripheral immune response is already observed after 4 weekly BCG instillations. However, patients not previously immunised against mycobacterial antigens may require 6 weekly instillations to achieve a maximum stimulation level [30]. Following the induction course, several studies have reported that additional BCG treatment may decrease recurrence.

Two decades ago, Zlotta et al [17] showed that intravesical BCG instillations induced a transient (less than 6 months) peripheral immune activation against BCG antigens. Reactivation was observed in most cases after additional BCG courses [17]. This absence of long-lasting immune activation after a single 6-week course of BCG could be related to the increased clinical efficacy observed with BCG maintenance instillations. However, the optimum period of BCG maintenance is still controversial. The Southwest Oncology Group BCG maintenance regimen was a weekly dose for 3 weeks at 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36 months [13, 31, 32].

The EORTC–Genitourinary (GU) group compared 1-year maintenance therapy versus 3-years maintenance therapy in intermediate and high-risk patients [33]. This study showed that intermediate risk patients should have a maintenance course for 1 year as there was no further improvement in outcome by the extended 3 years course. However, for high-risk patients, the 3 years regimen was superior in reducing the recurrences compared to the 1-year course [33]. This trial also compared a full standard BCG dose to one-third BCG dose. It did not show any difference in toxicity between full dose and one-third of the standard BCG dose, but the one-third dose was associated with increased rates of recurrences as it was a suboptimal dose [33]. More recently, the Club Urológico Español de Tratamiento Oncológico showed in a randomised trial that a maintenance course with a single BCG dose every 3 months for 3 years is superior to induction alone in high-risk patients with NMIBC [34]. The EAU guidelines recommend BCG induction therapy, as well as 1 year of maintenance BCG therapy for the intermediate risk group. For the high-risk group, the recommendation is 1 to 3 years of maintenance BCG therapy [32].

Meta-analyses suggest a more balanced view. Indeed, Quan et al [24] combining over 2,000 patients from various randomised trials did not observe any difference between low and standard dose. Similarly, Chou et al [25] concluded that head-to-head trials showed no clear differences between standard and lower doses of BCG in risk of recurrence, progression or mortality, including among patients with higher-risk NMIBC. There was some inconsistency though with standards of evidence deemed low.

Prevention of recurrence

Shelley and colleagues in a meta-analysis showed that BCG therapy was superior to resection alone for prevention of NMIBC recurrences [35]. Several meta-analyses have proven the superiority of BCG after resection compared to resection alone or compared with intravesical chemotherapy in preventing recurrences [36, 37]. A meta-analysis by Malmström and colleagues showed that intravesical BCG with maintenance course has 32% reduction in risk of recurrence compared to Mitomycin C (MMC) intravesical chemotherapy [38]. In a randomised phase 3 study 30911, the EORTC-GU group compared epirubicin, BCG and BCG plus isoniazid in intermediate- and high-risk NMIBC [39]. Intravesical BCG with or without isoniazid was superior to epirubicin for preventing recurrence in both intermediate and high-risk groups [39]. Duchek et al [40] compared BCG alone to epirubicin and interferon-alpha2b in a multi-centric randomised control trial. Patients were given an induction course, followed by a maintenance course for 2 years. BCG was superior in preventing recurrence compared to the combination of epirubicin and interferon-alpha2b [40]. Another randomised controlled trial assessed the long-term efficacy of maintenance BCG compared to maintenance MMC in recurrent superficial bladder tumours with 20 years follow up. BCG significantly reduced recurrences compared to MMC [41].

BCG effect on progression

BCG has been consistently shown to decrease the progression rates of NMIBC. A meta-analysis by Sylvester and colleagues outlined the benefits of BCG maintenance in preventing progression of NMIBC although interestingly enough this benefit was limited to CIS only [23]. Another meta-analysis by Bohle and colleagues demonstrated statistically significant superiority of BCG with maintenance course compared to MMC maintenance for reducing the risk of progression in superficial bladder tumours [42].

BCG failure and subclassification

About 40% of patients of NMIBC will fail intravesical BCG treatment. Although many factors might lead to BCG failure, the dose of BCG and type of T helper response (Th1 or TH2) may lead to dramatically diverging outcomes. Low-dose BCG might not trigger enough TH1-type immune response, which is the main response to BCG activity. Too high doses of BCG may paradoxically activate mixed TH1/TH2 responses which will counterbalance the TH1 response [15, 43]. Other factors of BCG failure include occult micrometastatic disease prior to BCG therapy [15].

Patients who fail intravesical BCG treatment are usually sub-classified into three categories based on the type of failure:

(a) BCG refractory, which is the persistence of disease after induction or maintenance BCG treatment.

(b) BCG relapse, the recurrence of disease after a disease-free period post BCG treatment.

(c) BCG intolerance when the patient is not tolerating the completion of BCG induction [44].

The definitions, endpoints and clinical trial designs for NMIBC as recommended by the International Bladder Cancer Group might serve as an excellent current state-of-the-art resource [45]. The type of failure (BCG unresponsive, refractory, relapsing or intolerant) should be clearly defined. Because stakes are very high for these patients, for whom BCG has failed, and options are limited, single-arm designs may be relevant for the BCG-unresponsive population. The consensus for a clinically meaningful initial complete response rate (for CIS) or recurrence-free rate (for papillary tumours) is of at least 50% at 6 months, 30% at 12 months and 25% at 18 months.

Despite promising studies, there is no current gold standard intravesical after BCG failure. Radical cystectomy (and trimodal therapy for selected patients) remains the standard treatment to prevent further disease progression [32, 46]. However, the future seems brighter. Given the efficacy, approval and increased use of immune checkpoint inhibitors against PD-L1 or PD-1 for advanced and metastatic bladder cancer, or platinum—ineligible or resistant, the role of these agents in BCG-relapsing disease at various disease stages is under consideration. Current trials in BCG-unresponsive disease are underway, including the NCT02808143 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02808143) trial where Pembrolizumab is administered intravesically in combination with BCG in patients with high risk or BCG-refractory NMIBC.

The NCT02844816 trial evaluates the complete response at 25 weeks after intravenous Atezolizumab (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02844816) in patients with a CIS component and the event-free survival at 18 months in patients with BCG-unresponsive high-risk NMIBC (Ta/T1/CIS). These trials may prove difficult to complete, as shown by the Nivolumab trial NCT03106610 in BCG failure which was terminated because of slow accrual (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03106610).

A number of randomised controlled trials have studied the use of Electromotive Drug Administration (EMDA) of intravesical MMC in NMIBC but evidence remains lacking on the use of EMDA-MMC in patients who have become unresponsive to BCG therapy. Our group has recently reported our early data, albeit in a very limited series of 30 patients, showing evidence of progression-free survival in over 60% of patients at the 2-year mark [47].


BCG remains the gold standard treatment for patients with intermediate- and high-risk NMIBC. After four decades of use, the exact mechanism of action remains unknown and further studies would be helpful to augment its efficacy. However, the future of BCG for preventing recurrences and progression in NMIBC looks still bright as no other effective therapy for these patients appears on the horizon.

The space of BCG failure is the object of intense research activity as currently there is no gold standard intravesical treatment. Hopefully, new intravesical therapies or immune checkpoint blockade agents will meet this unmet need for patients and their physicians.

Conflicts of interest


Funding statement

No source of funding was given for this review.


1. Luca S and Mihaescu T (2013) History of BCG vaccine MAEDICA (Buchae) 8(1) 53–58

2. Old LJ, Clark DA, and Benacerraf B (1959) Effect of bacillus calmette-guerin infection on transplanted tumours in the mouse Nature 184(5) 291–292 https://doi.org/10.1038/184291a0 PMID: 14428599

3. Mathé G, Amiel JL, and Schwarzenberg L, et al (1969) Active immunotherapy for acute lymphoblastic leukaemia Lancet 1(7597) 697–699 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(69)92648-8 PMID: 4182654

4. Morton DL, Eilber FR, and Joseph WL, et al (1970) Immunological factors in human sarcomas and melanomas: a rational basis for immunotherapy Ann Surg 172(4) 740–749 https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-197010000-00018 PMID: 5272336 PMCID: 1397284

5. Zbar B, Bernstein I, and Tanaka T, et al (1970) Tumor immunity produced by the intradermal inoculation of living tumor cells and living mycobacterium bovis (strain BCG) Science 170(3963) 1217–1218 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.170.3963.1217 PMID: 4920656

6. Zbar B, Ribi E, and Rapp HJ (1973) An experimental model for immunotherapy of cancer Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 39 3–9 PMID: 4595326

7. Bloomberg SD, Brosman SA, and Hausman MS, et al (1975) The effects of BCG on the dog bladder Invest Urol 12(6) 423–427 PMID: 1091593

8. Morales A, Eidinger D, and Bruce AW (1976) Intracavitary bacillus calmette-guérin in the treatment of superficial bladder tumors J Urol 116(2) 180–183 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)58737-6 PMID: 820877

9. Lamm DL, Thor DE, and Harris SC, et al (1980) Bacillus calmette-guerin immunotherapy of superficial bladder cancer J Urol 124(1) 38–40 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)55282-9 PMID: 6997513

10. Brosman SA (1982) Experience with bacillus calmette-guérin in patients with superficial bladder carcinoma J Urol 128(1) 27–30 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)52736-6 PMID: 6809960

11. Aldousari S and Kassouf W (2010) Update on the management of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer Can Urol Assoc J 4(1) 56–64 https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.777 PMID: 20165581 PMCID: 2812001

12. Fuge O, Vasdev N, and Allchorne P, et al (2015) Immunotherapy for bladder cancer Res Rep Urol 7 65–79 PMID: 26000263 PMCID: 4427258

13. Pettenati C and Ingersoll MA (2018) Mechanisms of BCG immunotherapy and its outlook for bladder cancer Nat Rev Urol 15 616–625 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41585-018-0055-4 PMID: 29991725

14. Joudi FN, Smith BJ, and O’Donnell MA, et al (2006) Final results from a national multicenter phase II trial of combination bacillus calmette-guérin plus interferon Urol Oncol 24(4) 344–348 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2005.11.026 PMID: 16818189

15. Zlotta AR, Fleshner NE, and Jewett MA (2009) The management of BCG failure in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: an update Can Urol Assoc J 3 S199–S205 https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.1196 PMID: 20019985 PMCID: 2792453

16. Redelman-Sidi G, Glickman MS, and Bochner BH (2014) The mechanism of action of BCG therapy for bladder cancer–a current perspective Nat Rev Urol 11(3) 153–162 https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2014.15 PMID: 24492433

17. Zlotta AR, Drowart A, and Van Vooren JP, et al (1997) Evolution and clinical significance of the T cell proliferative and cytokine response directed against the fibronectin binding antigen 85 complex of bacillus calmette-guerin during intravesical treatment of superficial bladder cancer J Urol 157(2) 492–498 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(01)65185-1 PMID: 8996341

18. Zhao W, Schorey JS, and Groger R, et al (1997) Characterization of the fibronectin binding motif for a unique mycobacterial fibronectin attachment protein, FAP J Biol Chem 274(8) 4521–4526 https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.274.8.4521

19. Zlotta AR, Van Vooren JP, and Denis O, et al (2000) What are the immunologically active components of bacille calmette-guérin in therapy of superficial bladder cancer? Int J Cancer 87(6) 844–852 PMID: 10956396

20. LaRue H, Ayari C, and Bergeron A, et al (2013) Toll-like receptors in urothelial cells—targets for cancer immunotherapy Nat Rev Urol 10(9) 537–545 https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2013.153 PMID: 23979666

21. Kiselyov A, Bunimovich-Mendrazitsky S, and Startsev V (2015) Treatment of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer with bacillus calmette-guerin (BCG): biological markers and simulation studies BBA Clin 4 27–34 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbacli.2015.06.002 PMID: 26673853 PMCID: 4661599

22. Sengiku A, Ito M, and Miyazaki Y, et al (2013) A prospective comparative study of intravesical bacillus calmette-guérin therapy with the Tokyo or Connaught strain for nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer J Urol 190(1) 50–54 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2013.01.084 PMID: 23376145

23. Sylvester RJ, van der Meijden AP, and Lamm DL (2002) Intravesical bacillus calmette-guerin reduces the risk of progression in patients with superficial bladder cancer: a meta-analysis of the published results of randomized clinical trials J Urol 168(5) 1964–1970 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(05)64273-5 PMID: 12394686

24. Quan Y, Jeong CW, and Kwak C, et al (2017) Dose, duration and strain of bacillus calmette-guerin in the treatment of nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer: meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials Medicine (Baltimore) 96(42) e8300 https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000008300 PMCID: 5662397

25. Chou R, Selph S, and Buckley DI, et al (2017) Intravesical therapy for the treatment of nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis J Urol 197(5) 1189–1199 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2016.12.090

26. Gan C, Mostafid H, and Khan MS, et al (2013) BCG immunotherapy for bladder cancer—the effects of substrain differences Nat Rev Urol 10(10) 580–588 https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2013.194 PMID: 24042563

27. Rentsch CA, Birkhäuser FD, and Biot C, et al (2014) Bacillus calmette-guérin strain differences have an impact on clinical outcome in bladder cancer immunotherapy Eur Urol 66(4) 677–688 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2014.02.061 PMID: 24674149

28. Ritz N, Hanekom WA, and Robins-Browne R, et al (2008) Influence of BCG vaccine strain on the immune response and protection against tuberculosis FEMS Microbiol Rev 32(5) 821–841 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6976.2008.00118.x PMID: 18616602

29. Lamm DL, van der Meijden PM, and Morales A, et al (1992) Incidence and treatment of complications of bacillus calmette-guérin intravesical therapy in superficial bladder cancer J Urol 147(3) 596–600 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)37316-0 PMID: 1538436

30. Zlotta AR, van Vooren JP, and Huygen K, et al (2000) What is the optimal regimen for BCG intravesical therapy? are six weekly instillations necessary? Eur Urol 37(4) 470–477 https://doi.org/10.1159/000020170 PMID: 10765079

31. Lamm DL, Blumenstein BA, and Crissman JD, et al (2000) Maintenance bacillus calmette-guerin immunotherapy for recurrent TA, T1 and carcinoma in situ transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder: a randomized southwest oncology group study J Urol 163(4) 1124–1129 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(05)67707-5 PMID: 10737480

32. Babjuk M, Burger M, and Compérat E, et al (2017) EAU Guidelines on non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (TaT1) Eur Urol [https://uroweb.org/wp-content/uploads/EAU-Guidelines-on-Non-muscle-Invasive-BC_TaT1-2017.pdf] Date accessed: 07/9/18

33. Oddens J, Brausi M, and Sylvester R, et al (2013) Final results of an EORTC-GU cancers group randomized study of maintenance bacillus calmette-guérin in intermediate- and high-risk Ta, T1 papillary carcinoma of the urinary bladder: one-third dose versus full dose and 1 year versus 3 years of maintenance Eur Urol 63(3) 462–472 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2012.10.039

34. Martínez-Piñeiro L, Portillo JA, and Fernández JM, et al (2015) Maintenance therapy with 3-monthly bacillus calmette-guerin for 3 years is not superior to standard induction therapy in high-risk non-muscle-invasive urothelial bladder carcinoma: final results of randomised CUETO study 98013 Eur Urol 68(2) 256–262 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2015.02.040 PMID: 25794457

35. Shelley, MD, Kynaston H, and Court J, et al (2001) A systematic review of intravesical bacillus calmette-guerin plus transurethral resection versus transurethral resection alone in Ta and T1 bladder cancer BJU Int 88(3) 209–216 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1464-410x.2001.02306.x PMID: 11488731

36. Han RF and Pan JG (2006) Can intravesical bacillus calmette-guerin reduce recurrence in patients with superficial bladder cancer? a meta-analysis of randomized trials J Urol 67(6) 1216–1223 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2005.12.014

37. Shelley MD, Wilt TJ, and Court J, et al (2004) Intravesical bacillus calmette-guerin is superior to mitomycin C in reducing tumour recurrence in high-risk superficial bladder cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized trials BJU Int 93(4) 485–490 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2003.04655.x PMID: 15008714

38. Malmström PU, Sylvester RJ, and Crawford DE, et al (2009) An individual patient data meta-analysis of the long-term outcome of randomised studies comparing intravesical mitomycin C versus bacillus calmette-guérin for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer Eur Urol 56(2) 247–256 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2009.04.038 PMID: 19409692

39. Sylvester RJ, Brausi MA, and Kirkels WJ, et al (2010) Long-term efficacy results of EORTC genito-urinary group randomized phase 3 study 30911 comparing intravesical instillations of epirubicin, bacillus calmette-guérin, and bacillus calmette-guérin plus isoniazid in patients with intermediate- and high-risk stage Ta T1 urothelial carcinoma of the bladder Eur Urol 57(5) 766–773 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2009.12.024 PMCID: 2889174

40. Duchek M, Johansson R, and Jahnson S, et al (2010) Bacillus calmette-guérin is superior to a combination of epirubicin and interferon-alpha2b in the intravesical treatment of patients with stage T1 urinary bladder cancer. A prospective, randomized, nordic study Eur Urol 57(1) 25–31 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2009.09.038

41. Järvinen R, Kaasinen E, and Sankila A, et al (2009) Long-term efficacy of maintenance bacillus calmette-guérin versus maintenance mitomycin C instillation therapy in frequently recurrent TaT1 tumours without carcinoma in situ: a subgroup analysis of the prospective, randomised FinnBladder I study with a 20-year follow-up Eur Urol 56(2) 260–265 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2009.04.009 PMID: 19395154

42. Bohle A and Bock PR (2004) Intravesical bacille calmette-guerin versus mitomycin C in superficial bladder cancer: formal meta-analysis of comparative studies on tumor progression J Urol 63(4) 682–686 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2003.11.049

43. Power CA, Wei G, and Bretscher PA (1998) Mycobacterial dose defines the Th1/Th2 nature of the immune response independently of whether immunization is administered by the intravenous, subcutaneous, or intradermal route Infect Immun 66(12) 5743–5750 PMID: 9826349 PMCID: 108725

44. Kamat AM, Flaig TW, and Grossman HB, et al (2015) Expert consensus document: consensus statement on best practice management regarding the use of intravesical immunotherapy with BCG for bladder cancer Nat Rev Urol 12(4) 225–235 https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2015.58 PMID: 25800393

45. Kamat AM, Sylvester RJ, and Böhle A, et al (2016) Definitions, end points, and clinical trial designs for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: recommendations from the international bladder cancer group J Clin Oncol 34(16) 1935–1944 https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2015.64.4070 PMID: 26811532 PMCID: 5321095

46. Kulkarni GS, Hermanns T, and Wei Y, et al (2017) Propensity score analysis of radical cystectomy versus bladder-sparing trimodal therapy in the setting of a multidisciplinary bladder cancer clinic J Clin Oncol 35(20) 2299–2305 https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2016.69.2327 PMID: 28410011

47. Juvet T, Wallis C, and Krimus L, et al (2018) Sequential administration of BCG and electomotive drug administration (EMDA) of mitomycin C (MMC) in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer having previously received intravesical therapy J Urol 199(4S) e1230–e1231 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2018.02.2999


Keywords: bladder cancer, bacillus Calmette–Guérin, non-muscle invasive bladder cancer, urothelial carcinoma, intravesical therapy

Loading Article Metrics ... Please wait

Related articles

Case Report: Surgical treatment in oligometastatic breast cancer

Abstract | Full Article | PDF Published: 20 May 2019 / https://doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2019.931

Case Report: Chemotherapy and anti-HER2 therapy in metastatic breast cancer in pregnancy followed by surgical treatment

Abstract | Full Article | PDF | Spanish Published: 14 May 2019 / https://doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2019.930

Clinical Study: Relevance of minor discrepancies at second pathology review in gynaecological cancer

Abstract | Full Article | PDF Published: 13 May 2019 / https://doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2019.929

Research: Associated factors with the knowledge of nurses of a high complexity oncology centre in Brazil, on the management of cancer pain

Abstract | Full Article | PDF Published: 09 May 2019 / https://doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2019.928

Short Communication: Prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction: a joint consensus guide from UK, European and USA breast and plastic reconstructive surgeons

Abstract | Full Article | PDF Published: 07 May 2019 / https://doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2019.927

Founding partners

European Cancer Organisation European Institute of Oncology

Founding Charities

Foundazione Umberto Veronesi Fondazione IEO Swiss Bridge

Published by

ecancer Global Foundation