ESMO 2024: Highlights and analysis
Prof Janet Brown talks to ecancer about the STAR trial. A Randomised multi-stage phase II/III trial of standard first-line therapy (sunitinib or pazopanib) comparing temporary cessation with allowing continuation, in the treatment of locally advanced and/or metastatic renal cancer.
She begins by discussing the rationale behind the trial. The main focus being to determine if a tyrosine kinase inhibitor drug-free interval strategy (DFIS) was non-inferior to a conventional continuation strategy (CCS) in the first line treatment of advanced RCC.
Prof Brown then talks about the methodology, explaining that after 24 weeks of sunitinib/pazopanib treatment, DFIS patients took a treatment break, until disease progression, with additional breaks dependent on disease response and patient/clinician choice. Trial strategy continued until intolerance, progression on treatment or death.
She concludes that although overall survival fell short of overall defined non-inferiority using this rigorous approach, probably due to fewer than expected events, DFIS was seen to be acceptable to patients and clinicians. DFIS also appeared to be highly cost-effective compared to CCS.
ecancer's filming has been kindly supported by Amgen through the ecancer Global Foundation. ecancer is editorially independent and there is no influence over content.
ESMO 2024: Highlights and analysis
Understanding the use of PARPi combinations to treat patients with mCRPC
ESMO 2024: Optimising the personalisation of prostate cancer treatment
Durable responses in aRCC, how do we optimise treatment?
Best practice in HRRm testing in patients with metastatic prostate cancer
Autovaccination with the intratumoral viral mimic poly-ICLC makes a cold tumour hot in prostate cancer
Chemo-immunotherapy combo nivolumab and nab-paclitaxel could be effective perioperative strategy for MIBC
EAU 2024: Bladder cancer latest