ESMO 2024: Best practice in HRRm testing in patients with metastatic prostate cancer
Dr Anton Buzdin speaks to ecancer at the WIN 2019 Symposium in Paris about the preliminary results generated from a trial using RNA sequencing data, and molecular pathway analysis to recommend targeted drugs for patients based on an oncobox-generated rating.
Following this, Dr Buzdin explains that clinicians had the choice to follow these recommendations or not, before being followed up to assess the clinical responses of these patients.
He also describes the results of this study, in which it was found that RNA-guided therapies were significantly more efficient, compared to standard of care ones.
Dr Buzdin mentions that future trials should focus on the use of transcriptomic and genomic profiling to obtain improved clinical responses when compared to conventional therapies.
We presented the preliminary results of a clinical trial we have initiated. This was a trial which was, to our knowledge, the first trial based purely on RNA sequencing data. So based on RNA sequencing data and molecular pathway analysis targeted drugs were suggested for cancer patients. The clinical competency was recommending or not the drugs based on the rating generated by the Oncobox analytic platform. Then local clinicians, local treating doctors, were taking clinical decisions either to use Oncobox recommendations or not. The patients were then followed up and the clinical response results, such as progression, stabilisation or partial or complete response were collected for the groups of patients who received Oncobox recommended therapy and who did not receive this therapy and for those who did not receive any therapy and were on palliative care.
We compared some of the primary outcomes for those patients and showed that RNA guided molecular diagnostics was significantly more efficient than standard of care therapy which is reflected by a proportion of clinical benefit of 73% in Oncobox guided therapy versus 55% for the other therapies group which looks to us truly encouraging results. We now want to organise a new trial, it would be fantastic if it could be done within the auspices of WIN, that would include both transcriptomic and genomic profiling. For transcriptomic it will be RNA sequencing, for genomics it will be whole exome sequencing. This will be sponsored by the Oncobox consortium so all those interested to participate are warmly welcome.
We hope that this trial will last for approximately four years, one year to organise a consortium and three years to do the study. The gene expression and genetic data will be shared within the consortium participants and, of course, the primary goal is to obtain better clinical responses than the standardly used therapies. Our major goal is the clinical benefit of cancer patients.
So considering the distinguishing features of the Oncobox technology this is that it uses molecular data on gene expression, not only on the level of analysis of single genes but also at the level of molecular pathway activation which can be calculated using high throughput molecular data. It has shown its better applicability as a biomarker compared to individual genes. Now this can be applied also at the genomic level based on mutations identified; also what’s called pathway instability score can be calculated which can be also transformed into a drug ranking score.
ESMO 2024: Best practice in HRRm testing in patients with metastatic prostate cancer
Synthetic biology and precision medicine in blood and gynaecological cancers
OncoAlert Round Up for September 15-21, 2023
Choosing Wisely in radiology Tanzania
TARGeted IORT INTRABEAM is a useful treatment option for early stage breast cancer
The advantages of IORT for early breast cancer treatment
Combination of camonsertib plus PARPi shows clinical activity in DDR-aberrant tumours
Global adoption of single-shot targeted IORT for breast cancer
Moving to the future: Artificial intelligence in surgery