Epcoritamab induces deep and durable responses in chemotherapy-ineligible elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma
At ASCO 2026, Dr Matteo Carlino talks to ecancer about the five-year follow-up data from the phase IIb KEYNOTE-942 trial evaluating the personalised mRNA neoantigen therapy intismeran in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with high-risk resected melanoma.
The combination continued to demonstrate durable improvements in recurrence-free survival and distant metastasis-free survival compared with pembrolizumab alone, with nearly 69% of patients remaining recurrence-free at five years. A trend towards improved overall survival was also observed, while the safety profile remained consistent with previous analyses.
Dr Carlino notes that these long-term findings support the potential of personalised mRNA-based immunotherapy to reduce the risk of recurrence following surgery and have led to ongoing phase III evaluation in melanoma and other tumour types.
KEYNOTE-942 is a randomised phase II trial of pembrolizumab alone or pembrolizumab plus intismeran, a personalised neoadjuvant therapy, in high-risk resected melanoma, really seeing if the addition of intismeran to pembrolizumab can reduce the risk of recurrence.
Could you outline the methodology?
It was an open label, so non-blinded, study randomised 2:1. So we took patients who had had resected stage, high-risk, stage III or IV, melanoma. All those patients needed to have available tissue to determine they could make the intismeran product and once that was confirmed that we could in fact make intismeran for those patients they were randomised 2:1 to either open-label pembrolizumab alone or the combination. Every patient got a year of pembrolizumab and the patients on the combination arm got nine doses of intismeran along with the pembrolizumab.
What did you find?
We found that the addition of intismeran to pembrolizumab reduced the risk of recurrence and also reduced the risk of distant recurrence by 49% and 59% respectively.
What’s next?
This is quite a provoking study because there’s quite a significant difference and there’s also a lot of translational data showing why the intismeran works and that the immune system is responding to the intismeran neoadjuvant. However, it needs confirmation and so the confirmation is a randomised phase III study with a larger melanoma population, including stage II, III and IV patients. That study has actually completed enrolment and results are hopefully awaited some time soon.
Epcoritamab induces deep and durable responses in chemotherapy-ineligible elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma
Adjuvant avelumab reduces relapse risk in stage III Merkel cell carcinoma
Darovasertib plus crizotinib improves outcomes in HLA-A2–negative metastatic uveal melanoma
Adagloxad simolenin plus OBI-821 shows no survival benefit compared to standard of care in triple-negative breast cancer
mRNA-4359 plus pembrolizumab shows high response rates and robust T-cell activation in melanoma
Adjuvant pembrolizumab in resected merkel cell carcinoma shows improved distant metastasis-free survival
IO102-IO103 cancer vaccine plus pembrolizumab demonstrates PFS benefit in advanced melanoma
Treatment with BAY 2927088 led to durable responses in patients previously treated HER2-mutant NSCLC
Choosing the right Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKI) for CML Patients