New research published today in the journal Blood Advances is the first to show that restricting calories, reducing fat and sugar intake, and increasing physical activity may boost the effectiveness of chemotherapy for older children and adolescents with leukaemia.
This intervention, which improved chemotherapy outcomes for children being treated at two institutions, will be further studied through a national trial later this year.
B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (B-ALL), a cancer affecting the white blood cells in the bone marrow, is the most common type of cancer in children.
In the study, researchers assessed the effects of diet and exercise on 40 individuals aged 10-21 undergoing chemotherapy at Children's Hospital Los Angeles and City of Hope National Medical Center after diagnosis with high-risk B-ALL.
The study dietician and physical therapist worked with the patients and their families to design low-carb, low-fat, low-sugar diet plans and moderate daily exercise regimens to meet their individual needs and preferences, as well as monitor their progress and offer ongoing family education throughout the trial.
A key aim of the plans was to induce a 20% or greater caloric deficit, divided equally between reduced intake and increased calories burned.
Compared to patients in a historical control group, at the end of chemotherapy the individuals on the study's diet and exercise program were less likely to have minimal residual disease (MRD), which refers to cancer cells left in the body after treatment and is a strong predictor of eventual relapse.
Notably, adherence to the diet and exercise program reduced the chances of detecting MRD after chemotherapy in all patients, regardless of their starting body weight or composition.
"This study is the first to show that we can use dietary changes to make chemotherapy work better to get rid of leukaemia," said study author Etan Orgel, MD, MS, of Children's Hospital Los Angeles and the Keck School of Medicine of USC.
"It is not additional pills or just one more medicine to take, and it is something any family across the world could do."
Adherence to the diet portion of the program was high: 82% of the study participants achieved a caloric deficit throughout their time on chemotherapy.
Exercise adherence was not as high (31%) and researchers aim to explore this in subsequent studies.
According to the research team, the relatively high participation could be attributed to the sense of empowerment felt by patients and families. "This is something they can do to contribute to their own outcomes.
They have the power to harness diet and exercise as a therapy," said Dr. Orgel.
Being overweight or obese are increasingly recognised as risk factors for cancer.
Preexisting obesity is associated with increased risk of developing B-ALL during childhood, and being obese when undergoing therapy for B-ALL has been tied to a greater risk for relapse and poorer survival.
Preclinical studies have demonstrated that the effects of excess weight on B-ALL may be reversible.
Prior to this study, the possibility of reversal had not been tested in adults or children.
While fat mass decreased only in those participants who started out as overweight or obese, patients in all weight categories showed a beneficial effect on MRD.
The fact that MRD improved for all patients and did not appear to be affected by these changes in fat mass suggests that the mechanism driving the changes is not strictly fat tissue.
Changes to insulin and glucose levels could be explored further in future studies, according to the researchers.
"This is a clear example of taking a scientific theory and bringing it into practice," said senior study author Steven Mittelman, MD, PhD, of UCLA Mattel Children's Hospital, who led the laboratory research that paved the way for this study.
"Based on a series of early observations and animal models showing a biological connection between obesity and chemotherapy outcomes, we designed this first-of-its-kind clinical intervention.
The success of the trial is a testament to that seamless interaction between bench and clinical researcher."
Source: American Society of Hematology
We are an independent charity and are not backed by a large company or society. We raise every penny ourselves to improve the standards of cancer care through education. You can help us continue our work to address inequalities in cancer care by making a donation.
Any donation, however small, contributes directly towards the costs of creating and sharing free oncology education.
Together we can get better outcomes for patients by tackling global inequalities in access to the results of cancer research.
Thank you for your support.