Targeted therapies associated with increased risk for and incidence of thrombosis in the treatment of breast cancer
Prof Debu Tripathy speaks to ecancer at the 2019 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting about an abstract that was presented at this year's meeting that could potentially change breast cancer practice.
He discusses the use of the HER2-directed antibody, margetuximab that has been specifically engineered to have a high affinity for the Fc receptor. This trial compared the effect of this antibody with trastuzumab, both in combination with chemotherapy.
Several other abstracts are important and may change practice. The one that is really new and is being presented for the first time is with a new antibody called margetuximab. This is an antibody directed against HER2, the human epithelial receptor 2. For the last twenty years now we have had more effective therapies for the 20% or so of patients that have HER2 positive breast cancers. Trastuzumab, also known as Herceptin, was introduced at that time and actually prolongs survival both in early and late stage disease.
However, in patients with advanced breast cancer, despite the numerous therapies that have since been approved, patients do ultimately become resistant to these therapies. So we need newer treatments. We’ve also known for many years that the effects of antibodies like trastuzumab are based not only on blocking the growth factor function of HER2 but also on stimulating the immune system. Some people inherit different versions of receptors to the antibodies that activate the immune system, these are known as Fc receptors. Some people inherit low affinity receptors that makes them get less of the benefit from treatments like trastuzumab.
Margetuximab is an antibody that has been engineered, the amino acids have been changed, to have a higher affinity for the Fc receptor. So it’s a very elegant design and the question was will this new engineered antibody perform better than trastuzumab and other chemotherapy drugs which they are typically given with. So this trial compared margetuximab plus chemotherapy of physician’s choice to trastuzumab plus chemotherapy of physician’s choice in patients who had already progressed on all the standard therapies. This study, in fact, did meet its endpoint, it showed an improvement in progression free survival of about a month. We typically like to see longer improvements but nevertheless this did meet the pre-specified threshold and was statistically significant.
In addition, patients on margetuximab had a higher response rate. So we await longer follow-up of this study, including survival and other safety signals. So far it appears to be as safe as trastuzumab and this represents a new option for patients with HER2 positive breast cancer. But also, perhaps more importantly, the theory that one can actually alter the antibody to bind and affect other activities of the immune system is a very important step and perhaps this will be employed in other adaptations and design modifications to currently available antibodies across a whole spectrum of diseases.
Targeted therapies associated with increased risk for and incidence of thrombosis in the treatment of breast cancer
Comment: Trial updates from GALAXIES Lung-201 and RELATIVITY-104 in NSCLC
ESMO 2024: Latest in EGFR mutated NSCLC
ESMO 2024: Optimising the personalisation of prostate cancer treatment
Patient reported outcomes for telisotuzumab vedotin in c-Met protein overexpressing EGFR WT nonsquamous NSCLC
Endocrine therapy plus trastuzumab and pertuzumab shows excellent survival outcomes in HR and HER2 positive early BC
Adjuvant avelumab versus control does not significantly improve DFS but does improve OS in high-risk TNBC patients
OncoAlert round up July 28th to August 3rd, 2023
Management of HER2 positive metastatic breast cancer treatment algorithm