A study from the University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center uncovers a new mechanism to explain why some prostate tumours switch from a common, treatable form to a more rare and aggressive form of prostate cancer.

Using tissue samples and cell models from patients, Joshi Alumkal, M.D., Wicha Family Professor of Oncology and leader of the genitourinary medical oncology section at Rogel, and his team zeroed in on the lysine-specific demethylase 1 (LSD1), a protein involved in turning genes off and on in normal and cancer cells that appears particularly important in certain aggressive forms of prostate cancer. Further, they outlined a promising path to overcome this deadly form of treatment resistance: LSD1 inhibitors.

The findings are published in JCI Insight.

Most prostate tumours remain adenocarcinomas, or glandular tumours after male-hormone lowering treatments—the principal treatment for metastatic prostate cancers. But many undergo a deadly switch called lineage plasticity, where the tumour shifts from a glandular tumour to one with a nerve, or brain-like, make-up.

Researchers have a limited understanding of how prostate tumours undergo lineage plasticity, but once it happens, few treatment options exist.

“Aggressive forms of prostate cancer are on the rise as a work-around to some of our newer, more potent hormonal treatments,” said Alumkal. “Our prior work demonstrated that approximately 15-20% of patients whose tumours start growing despite newer hormonal treatments will lose the adenocarcinoma program and take on other identities, including one called neuroendocrine prostate cancer.”

Patients with neuroendocrine prostate cancer fare much worse than patients whose tumours remain adenocarcinomas, and there are currently limited treatment options for these patients.

“Our laboratory is focused on understanding how prostate tumours shift away from a glandular program and ways to block this lineage switch,” said Alumkal, who also co-leads the Translational and Clinical Research Program at Rogel.

A promising countermeasure

For the past decade, Alumkal’s laboratory has been studying LSD1. He first showed that LSD1 was important for the survival of prostate adenocarcinoma tumours by turning on genes that are linked with stem cells, primitive cells that give rise to multiple cell types and that are difficult to eradicate. Building on that, his team sought to determine whether LSD1 also plays a role in neuroendocrine prostate cancer.

The answer is yes.

By examining tissues from patients with metastatic prostate cancer, the team determined that LSD1 was more highly expressed in neuroendocrine prostate tumours than in adenocarcinoma tumours.

They used a technique called RNA interference to remove LSD1 from neuroendocrine prostate cancer cells and found that the neuroendocrine prostate cancer models grew less well when LSD1 was absent, demonstrating LSD1’s importance for the survival of these aggressive cells.

They then discovered that blocking LSD1’s interaction with other proteins was a more effective approach than blocking LSD1’s enzymatic function in neuroendocrine prostate cancer cells, consistent with their prior work in prostate adenocarcinoma tumours.

“Ultimately, we found that a class of drugs—allosteric inhibitors—that block protein-protein interactions was much more effective in stopping LSD1 and slowing the growth of cancer cells,” said Anbarasu Kumaraswamy, Ph.D., the first author and post-doctoral fellow in the Alumkal Laboratory.

Uncovering how LSD1 functions in neuroendocrine prostate tumours led the team to discover another dimension to this protein: LSD1 turns off p53, a tumour suppressor gene that acts as a brake in cancer cells.

When the team examined how genes changed after LSD1 was inhibited, reactivation of p53 came up again and again across all the cell models. The team confirmed that LSD1 was turning off p53, preventing it from binding to the DNA. LSD1 inhibitors reactivated p53 and suppressed tumour growth. “That cell lines lacking p53 were less sensitive to LSD1 inhibition gives us strong clues about the importance of p53 reactivation for the anti-tumour effects of LSD1 inhibition,” Alumkal said.

The team tested LSD1 inhibitors in neuroendocrine prostate tumours implanted in mice. One of the drugs tested, seclidemstat, is in a phase 1 clinical trial in sarcoma. In every case, seclidemstat blocked the growth of the tumours, and in several tumours there was complete regression. Importantly, treatment was well-tolerated with no observed toxicities in the mice.

Alumkal says the research points toward LSD1 inhibition with this type of drug as potentially beneficial for patients with neuroendocrine prostate cancer. “The fact that the drug we found is in clinical testing gives us hope that we might be able to develop clinical trials targeting LSD1 in aggressive prostate cancers in the near term,” he said. “These findings could also lead to a more generalisable approach to reactivating p53 function in other cancers.” 

Source: Michigan Medicine - University of Michigan