Two new discoveries led by Cedars-Sinai Cancer investigators help improve the understanding of what drives the development of ovarian cancer and why some women’s tumours do not respond to therapy.
“Understanding the relationship between molecular profiles and clinical presentation of ovarian cancer not only can help guide the development of personalised therapeutic approaches, but can also help us identify women who are at the highest risk so we can intervene before the cancer even develops,” said Simon Gayther, PhD, professor of Biomedical Sciences, director of the Centre for Bioinformatics and Functional Genomics at Cedars-Sinai and senior author of both studies.
The first study, published today in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute, identified four new regions of the human genome that harbour genetic variants or mutations that put women at an increased risk of developing epithelial ovarian cancer, the most common type of ovarian cancer.
“When it comes to ovarian cancer, prevention is how we’re really going to impact mortality,” said Michelle Jones, PhD, a research scientist in the Centre for Bioinformatics and Functional Genomics and corresponding author of the study. “This study helps us accurately identify women who carry cancer-causing mutations, which can help physicians develop preventive strategies for these women.”
To pinpoint the mutations, the team of investigators used new methods to analyse the structural variation of the genome, which is made up of 23 pairs of chromosomes where an individual’s genetic code is stored.
While most research focuses on analysing the change in the sequence of the gene, the team looked at the number of copies of the gene an individual has—known as a copy number variant.
When the genome gets copied, structural variation can occur, and stretches of the genome can get deleted, duplicated or rearranged to another position.
These changes can lead to diseases, like cancer.
The researchers collaborated with scientists at the University of Cambridge to specifically look at deletions and duplications in 13,000 women with ovarian cancer and compared them to 17,000 women without ovarian cancer from the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium to identify copy number variants that were associated with ovarian cancer risk.
They found significant deletions and duplications in the BRCA1 gene, BRCA2 gene, and RAD51C gene, all of which are known to harbour changes in a patient’s DNA sequence that increase risk for ovarian cancer.
Also found: four new genes that have not been previously linked to an increased risk for ovarian cancer.
The study, which is the largest to date to evaluate the contribution of copy number variants to ovarian cancer risk, will likely lead to more accurate genetic testing for women.
“We have the technology that can pick up these deletions and duplications, but it’s not always done consistently in clinical genetic testing,” said Jones. “We hope these findings highlight the value of looking at copy number variants in clinical genetic testing.”
The second study, published in the Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research, gives investigators a deeper understanding as to how ovarian tumours develop resistance to chemotherapy, which occurs in about 80% of high-grade serous ovarian cancer patients and ultimately leads to their succumbing to the disease.
Previously, researchers believed that ovarian tumours evolve after they are exposed to chemotherapy, and that they change their gene expression to adapt and survive through the treatment.
However, using whole genome sequencing, they found for the first time that this is not the case.
Instead, it seems more likely that most high-grade serous ovarian tumours have the capacity to survive chemotherapy from a very early stage, said Jones, who is also the co-first author on this study.
“This study has changed our understanding of how tumours respond to chemotherapy,” Jones said. “Previously it was thought that we could probably find a way to treat chemo-resistant tumours with other drugs after they have been treated with the standard therapy, but this study suggests that may not be the best approach.”
“By improving our understanding as to how tumours doing survive chemotherapy, and even continue growing throughout treatment, as well as finding vulnerabilities in the tumours, will give us an opportunity to design better drugs and save the lives of women with ovarian cancer,” added Gayther.
As researchers at Cedars-Sinai Cancer explore how to more accurately identify women who carry cancer-causing mutations, clinicians are simultaneously working to monitor, and rapidly treat as needed, BRCA-positive patients.
Under the leadership of B J Rimel, MD, a gynaecological oncologist and medical director of the Cedars-Sinai Cancer Clinical Trials Office, Cedars-Sinai recently launched a high-risk BRCA clinic—known as a previvor clinic—for BRCA1 and 2 carriers at high-risk for developing ovarian cancer.
The goal, Rimel says, is to arm BRCA-positive patients with regular screening and risk-reducing prevention strategies—in a one-stop clinic setting.
“Our multidisciplinary care team, comprised of a reproductive and infertility physician, a gynaecologist oncologist and a genetic counsellor, spends time with each high-risk patient during the clinic visit,” said Rimel. “We provide transvaginal screening onsite, review results from relevant lab work and ensure questions are addressed in real-time.”
Modelled by an existing and highly successful high-risk BRCA breast cancer programme, the ovarian cancer previvor clinic remains a significant focus at Cedars-Sinai.
“Alterations in genes such as BRCA in either the cancer or the patient’s germline have profound implications for treatment and prevention,” said Dan Theodorescu, MD, PhD, director of Cedars-Sinai Cancer and the PHASE ONE Foundation Distinguished Chair and professor of Surgery and Pathology and Laboratory Medicine. “As our research propels, so do our translational findings that impact and improve patient lives.”
Article 1: Copy number variants are ovarian cancer risk alleles at known and novel risk loci
Source: Cedars-Sinai Medical Centre