A sensitive blood test being developed by a team of researchers at the University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center shows promise for predicting whether patients with metastatic HPV-positive throat cancer will respond to treatment months earlier than standard imaging scans.
That's according to a study, published in Oncotarget, validating the test in a small group of patients with metastatic human papillomavirus-related oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma, a type of head and neck cancer that develops in the back of the mouth and in the throat.
If the test can quickly determine that a treatment approach isn't helping, it could allow doctors to seek out alternative therapies or clinical trials in a more timely manner. It could also potentially spare some patients months of toxic side effects from a treatment that isn't working.
"Currently, the only way doctors know if a treatment is working is for the patient to get an imaging scan every few months to see whether their tumours are shrinking," said oncologist Paul Swiecicki, M.D., one of the study's senior authors.
And this isn't fully accurate since some cancers show what we call pseudoprogression, where a successful treatment actually makes the tumours bigger before it shrinks them.
"Our goal was to develop a test that could tell us whether a treatment is likely to work after a single cycle," he continued.
The research comes amid a rising incidence of throat cancer caused by human papillomavirus infections, which are often spread through sexual activity.
Once the cancer has recurred or spread within the body, patients typically only live for about one year. Furthermore, most of the available treatments, such as immunotherapy, work for less than 20% of patients and can have significant side effects.
The test is a form of "liquid biopsy" that looks for DNA shed by a patient's cancer cells into their bloodstream using a method known as digital droplet PCR, which can amplify minute amounts of DNA for analysis.
Development of the test was led by co-first authors Catherine Haring, M.D., an otolaryngology resident, and Chandan Bhambhani, Ph.D., a postdoctoral research fellow in the lab of senior study author Muneesh Tewari, M.D., Ph.D.
"We can actually identify DNA from a small tumour at the back of the throat circulating throughout the entire bloodstream," Haring said.
"From a single tube of blood, this technology can isolate a single copy of tumour DNA," Bhambhani added.
"And quantifying the number of copies can tell us whether a patient's cancer is responding to treatment."
The study analysed more than 100 samples taken over nearly two years from 16 patients with advanced cancer that was positive for HPV 16, one of the most common, high-risk types of HPV infection.
Seven of the patients were treated with immunotherapy regimens. Eleven patients underwent treatment that included chemotherapy.
The researchers found that increasing levels of HPV-positive circulating tumour DNA after a course of treatment were a strong indicator that the cancer was not responding to the treatment. And that the tumour DNA could be detected months ahead of tumour growth that can be measured on imaging scans.
Swiecicki points to one of the patients in the study as an example.
The patient underwent chemotherapy treatment for about 200 days. Their HPV 16-positive circulating tumour DNA fell to nearly zero for the first 100 days and imaging scans showed the disease had stabilised.
But copies of the HPV 16 DNA started to multiply in their blood between day 100 and day 200, when the disease progression was ultimately detected on imaging scans.
"In the future, the idea is that the test would give us a window of time, about 100 days in this example, to find alternative therapies or a clinical trial," Swiecicki said.
"And this particular patient did have significant toxicities from the therapy, some of which potentially could have been avoided once it became clear the cancer was no longer responding to the treatment."
Senior study author Chad Brenner, Ph.D., an associate professor in the Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, notes that scientists around the world have been working to develop similar tests.
The success at U-M was the result of collaboration that involved clinicians as well as researchers with expertise in next-generation sequencing and in the genetics of head and neck cancer.
"Everybody talks about team science," added Tewari, a professor of internal medicine and of biomedical engineering, "but everybody involved in this effort contributed a unique piece. And U-M is a place that really embraces this spirit of interdisciplinary collaboration."
The blood test may also be useful for early detection of recurrence before the cancer is incurable.
According to additional findings the research team recently described in the journal Oral Oncology, HPV circulating tumour DNA is in the blood of patients with early stage throat cancer.
Retrospectively, the test was also able to identify recurrent disease in a patient more than a year before it was detected by with standard approaches.
Before treatment, the patient had significant levels of circulating tumour DNA in their blood, which dropped down to near zero in the months following treatment.
"We thought they were potentially cured," Brenner said. "We couldn't detect this biomarker at all."
But after six months, the level of circulating tumour DNA in their blood started to rise, slowly at first and then more dramatically.
"Yet we weren't able to detect clinical signs of recurrence until after the two-year time point," Brenner noted.
"So, our test was able to detect the first signals of recurrence a year and a half before it was evident on imaging scans."
While work to further optimise and validate the test continues, the team is partnering with other academic medical institutions to use the test to study the relationship between HPV-positive circulating tumour DNA and clinical outcomes in additional patients.
We are an independent charity and are not backed by a large company or society. We raise every penny ourselves to improve the standards of cancer care through education. You can help us continue our work to address inequalities in cancer care by making a donation.
Any donation, however small, contributes directly towards the costs of creating and sharing free oncology education.
Together we can get better outcomes for patients by tackling global inequalities in access to the results of cancer research.
Thank you for your support.