Tumour mutational burden (TMB) was an accurate predictor of response to treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors for female melanoma patients, but not for male patients, according to results of a study presented during Week 1 of the virtual AACR Annual Meeting 2021.
In June 2020, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the use of the immune checkpoint inhibitor pembrolizumab to treat adult and paediatric patients with advanced solid tumours with a high TMB. The FDA set the threshold for treatment of patients whose tumours have 10 or more mutations per megabase (TMB > 10 mut/Mb).
Early research has suggested that high TMB levels may be associated with better response to immune checkpoint inhibition, and that the response may differ between males and females.
“This motivated us to examine what are the sex-specific implications, if any, of the TMB > 10 mut/Mb threshold for selecting patients to be treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors,” said the study’s lead author, Neelam Sinha, MS, a member of the Cancer Data Science Laboratory at the Center for Cancer Research, part of the National Cancer Institute.
The researchers analysed data from Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center’s MSK-IMPACT tumour profiling panel. They examined data from 1,286 patients treated with anti-PD1/PD-L1 monotherapy, 99 patients treated with anti-CTLA4 monotherapy, and 255 treated with a combination of the two.
They focused on the nine cancer types that had TMB and clinical response data for at least 50 patients.
Consistent with previous reports, they first found that female patients with melanoma had a median of 6.51 mut/Mb, while male patients had a median of 11.81 mut/Mb.
Female patients whose tumours had TMB > 10 mut/Mb had 81 percent better overall survival following immune checkpoint inhibition compared with female patients with TMB below the current threshold.
In contrast, no significant differences were observed in treatment response between male patients with TMB above and below the 10 mut/Mb threshold.
The researchers did not find any significant sex-dependent differences in the response to anti-CTLA4 therapies, different chemotherapies, or combination therapies, when analysed using the TMB > 10 mut/Mb threshold.
In the analysis of other cancer types, female patients with glioblastoma had a similar trend of better response to immune checkpoint inhibition based on the current TMB threshold; however, the data did not reach statistical significance, possibly due to small sample size, said co-author Sanju Sinha, also a
member of the Cancer Data Science Lab at the Center for Cancer Research and a PhD candidate in the Biological Sciences Graduate Program at the University of Maryland.
“First, it is important to note that TMB > 10 mut/Mb is not currently required for melanoma patients to receive pembrolizumab. However, as clinicians may still take this threshold into account while considering therapies for a patient, it is important to raise awareness to this bias,” said Sanju Sinha.
“Second, in cancer types like glioblastoma and cancer of unknown primary, the FDA TMB criterion does currently apply. Hence, more data must be gathered to carefully assess whether its usage may induce a sex bias.”
The authors said the results of this study suggest that more research is necessary to fully assess the utility of TMB as a predictor of immunotherapy response.
“The overall value of TMB as a predictor of response is quite moderate, as many factors are involved in a patient’s response to immunotherapy,” said Neelam Sinha.
“If the current TMB threshold also induces a sex bias, its usage as a biomarker requires further scrutiny.”
Neelam Sinha added that the study results could add to research on cancer health disparities, which encompass sex as well as racial, ethnic, socioeconomic, and cultural differences.
“Addressing longstanding sex disparities in health care can help ensure equal treatment opportunities and benefit both sexes,” she said.
We are an independent charity and are not backed by a large company or society. We raise every penny ourselves to improve the standards of cancer care through education. You can help us continue our work to address inequalities in cancer care by making a donation.
Any donation, however small, contributes directly towards the costs of creating and sharing free oncology education.
Together we can get better outcomes for patients by tackling global inequalities in access to the results of cancer research.
Thank you for your support.