Researchers at Kaiser Permanente have found that patients with a very early form of breast cancer (ductal carcinoma in situ or DCIS) who have higher mammographic density may be at increased risk for subsequent breast cancer, especially in the breast opposite to the one with the initial cancer.
These study results are  published in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers &  Prevention, a journal of the American Association for Cancer  Research. 
Mammographic density refers to the proportion of the breast  that appears dense on a mammogram; it is one of the strongest risk factors for  primary invasive breast cancer. On a mammogram, dense tissue looks white while  non-dense tissue looks dark grey. The dense area consists primarily of breast  ducts and connective tissue, while the non-dense tissue is mostly fat.  
Results of a previous study showed that patients with DCIS who had  higher mammographic density had about two to three times increased risk for a  second breast cancer. 
To confirm her earlier findings, Laurel A. Habel,  Ph.D., research scientist at Kaiser Permanente’s Division of Research, and  colleagues conducted a larger cohort study that consisted of 935 women diagnosed  with DCIS who were treated with breast-conserving surgery (i.e., not a  mastectomy) between 1990 and 1997 at Kaiser Permanente of Northern California.  
After reviewing medical records, evaluating mammograms at diagnosis and  then calculating the risk of subsequent breast cancer events during follow-up,  the researchers found that risk of second breast cancer appeared to be elevated  among the women with higher density. 
“While risk was elevated for both  breasts, the increase was greatest and most consistent for the breast opposite  to the one with the initial cancer,” Habel said. 
Of the patients, 164  had a subsequent ipsilateral breast cancer (breast cancer on the original  cancer-affected breast) and 59 had a new primary cancer in the other breast  during follow-up. The researchers anticipated finding an increased risk of a  subsequent cancer in the breast with the initial cancer, as well as in the  opposite breast. 
Habel stressed that additional studies will be needed  to confirm these risk estimates and determine whether information on density can  aid in risk assessment and treatment options. 
“Information on  mammographic density may help with treatment decisions for ductal carcinoma in  situ patients,” she said. “While it’s not a strong enough risk factor on its  own, it may be possible to combine it with other factors to improve risk  assessment and inform treatment decisions.”
Source: AACR