ecancermedicalscience

Research

Suboptimal outcomes of group III paediatric genitourinary rhabdomyosarcoma-experience from treatment with a multimodal protocol in low- and middle-income setting

28 Nov 2025
Annesha Chakraborti, Badira Cheriyalinkal Parambil, Venkata Rama Mohan Gollamudi, Maya Prasad, Siddhartha Laskar, Nehal Khanna, Jifmi Jose Manjali, Sajid Qureshi, Mukta Ramadwar, Poonam Panjwani, Akshay Baheti, Vasundhara Patil, Sneha Shah, Girish Chinnaswamy

Genitourinary-Rhabdomyosarcomas (GU-RMS) are challenging to treat due to the probable lifelong sequelae of local therapy. Western-world data show 3-year event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) of 77% and 86%, respectively, for localised disease, with dismal outcomes for metastatic disease. We studied the clinical profile, outcomes and prognostic factors of GU-RMS treated with a multimodal protocol. Treatment-naïve children ≤ 15years with biopsy-proven GU-RMS treated from January 2013 to June 2022 were retrospectively analysed. Local therapy performed at 10–12 weeks of induction was radiotherapy (RT) and/or surgery. Fifty-two patients with a median tumour size of 5.5 cm (range, 3.4–9.2 cm) were analysed. Four patients (7.8%) had alveolar histology. The bladder was the commonest site of primary (36.5%). Group distribution: I-7 (13.4), II-1 (1.9%), III-35 (67.3%) and IV-9 (17.3%). Local therapy was surgery in 11 (21.5%), RT in 25 (49%) or both in 14 (26.9%) patients. With a median follow-up of 56 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 49.1%–63.1%), 4-year EFS for groups I–IV, were 100%, 50% (95% CI: 41%–59%) and 33.3% (95% CI: 2.6%–64%) (p = 0.01), respectively. The corresponding 4-year OS were 100%, 72% (95% CI: 56.4%–87.6%) and 33.3% (95% CI: 2.6%–64%) (p = 0.007), respectively. Relapses were locoregional-4 (7.7%), metastatic-5 (9.6%) and combined-4 (7.7%). Tumour size > 6.45 cm significantly affected outcomes in the localised cohort (hazard ratio = 4.1, 95% CI: 1.38–12.1, p = 0.01). Outcomes of group III GU-RMS in children treated on a multimodal protocol in our study are suboptimal compared to those from co-operative group trials, probably affected by large tumours at presentation, warranting alternative strategies for optimisation of survival.

Related Articles

Barnabas Atwiine, Nura Izath, James Ssemitego, Naome Nsiimenta, Wilson Birungi, Anitah Kusaasira, Nuriat Nambogo, Martin Mukama, Santorino Data
Julia Palma, Sofía Aljaro, Daniela Arce, Milena Villarroel, Federico Antillón, Luiz Lopes, Nataly Mercado, Adriana Morais, Andrés Portilla, Leonardo Arana, Guillermo Chantada, Mónica Cypriano, Soad Fuentes, Augusto Pereira, Lourdes Vega, Nubia Zuñiga, Liliana Vásquez, Andrea Capellano, Paola Friedrich
Anjali Rathee, Priyanshi Dixit, Surya Kant Tiwari, Mukul Aggarwal, Pradeep Kumar, Rishi Dhawan, Richa Chauhan, Jasmita Dass, Ganesh Kumar Vishwanathan, Tulika Seth, Manoranjan Mahapatra
Ariel Cherro, Laura Aresca, María Susana Ciruzzi, Alejo Agranatti, María Fernanda Montaña, Cynthia Frahne, Jaqueline Cimerman
Grace M Ferri*, John F Murphy*, Akash Oza*, Alexander J B Bulteel, Wafaa Abbasi, Rachel Anderson, Mehmed Taha Dinc, Eva Gaufberg, Kayra Cengiz, Sainikhil Sontha, Janice Weinberg, Patrick Kurpaska, Yashvin Onkarappa Mangala, Matthew Kulke, Umit Tapan
Meghal Prajapati, Anil Kumar Goel, Yamini Patel, Divyeshkumar Rana, S Lokesh, Pooja Panchal, Dhruv Rathod, Chandramouli Ramalingam, Kondeti Ajay Kumar