ecancermedicalscience

Research

Suboptimal outcomes of group III paediatric genitourinary rhabdomyosarcoma-experience from treatment with a multimodal protocol in low- and middle-income setting

28 Nov 2025
Annesha Chakraborti, Badira Cheriyalinkal Parambil, Venkata Rama Mohan Gollamudi, Maya Prasad, Siddhartha Laskar, Nehal Khanna, Jifmi Jose Manjali, Sajid Qureshi, Mukta Ramadwar, Poonam Panjwani, Akshay Baheti, Vasundhara Patil, Sneha Shah, Girish Chinnaswamy

Genitourinary-Rhabdomyosarcomas (GU-RMS) are challenging to treat due to the probable lifelong sequelae of local therapy. Western-world data show 3-year event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) of 77% and 86%, respectively, for localised disease, with dismal outcomes for metastatic disease. We studied the clinical profile, outcomes and prognostic factors of GU-RMS treated with a multimodal protocol. Treatment-naïve children ≤ 15years with biopsy-proven GU-RMS treated from January 2013 to June 2022 were retrospectively analysed. Local therapy performed at 10–12 weeks of induction was radiotherapy (RT) and/or surgery. Fifty-two patients with a median tumour size of 5.5 cm (range, 3.4–9.2 cm) were analysed. Four patients (7.8%) had alveolar histology. The bladder was the commonest site of primary (36.5%). Group distribution: I-7 (13.4), II-1 (1.9%), III-35 (67.3%) and IV-9 (17.3%). Local therapy was surgery in 11 (21.5%), RT in 25 (49%) or both in 14 (26.9%) patients. With a median follow-up of 56 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 49.1%–63.1%), 4-year EFS for groups I–IV, were 100%, 50% (95% CI: 41%–59%) and 33.3% (95% CI: 2.6%–64%) (p = 0.01), respectively. The corresponding 4-year OS were 100%, 72% (95% CI: 56.4%–87.6%) and 33.3% (95% CI: 2.6%–64%) (p = 0.007), respectively. Relapses were locoregional-4 (7.7%), metastatic-5 (9.6%) and combined-4 (7.7%). Tumour size > 6.45 cm significantly affected outcomes in the localised cohort (hazard ratio = 4.1, 95% CI: 1.38–12.1, p = 0.01). Outcomes of group III GU-RMS in children treated on a multimodal protocol in our study are suboptimal compared to those from co-operative group trials, probably affected by large tumours at presentation, warranting alternative strategies for optimisation of survival.

Related Articles

Vinotha Thomas, Monica Thiagarajan, Dhanya Susan Thomas, Ajit Sebastian, Rachel Chandy, Anitha Thomas, Grace Rebekah, Thomas Samuel Ram, Abraham Peedicayil, Greta Dreyer
Laura Mendonça Diefenthaeler, Julia Kasali Lima, Maria Carolina Buj, Giovani Gadonski, Matheus Gadonski Stortti Rosa, Alexandre Vieira, Gustavo Werutsky, Roberta Pozza, Juliana Giacomazzi
Brindha Senthil Kumar, Ponnagoundanpudur Sundaramoorthy Kirit, Nachimuthu Senthil Kumar, Shanmuganandam Sumathi, Samuel Lalhruaizela, Lal Hruaitluanga, Lal Hmingliana
Daniel F Pilco-Janeta, Myriam De la Cruz-Puebla, Daisy Guamán-Pilco, Diego Montenegro, Philipp Novotny, William Miranda
Parth Sharma, Mongjam Meghachandra Singh, Amod Laxmikant Borle, Disha Agrawal, Anurita Srivastava, Ravi Meher