Effect of therapeutic anticoagulation on overall survival in men receiving docetaxel for mCRPC

Share :
Published: 25 Feb 2013
Views: 4432
Rating:
Save
Dr Caroline Pratz - Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore

Dr Pratz talks to ecancer at ASCO's GU meeting, February 2013. Anticoagulants have been postulated to possess antitumor activity, although clinical data supporting this claim are conflicting. The researchers sought to examine the effect of therapeutic anticoagulation on OS in men with mCRPC receiving first-line docetaxel chemotherapy.

They retrospectively reviewed the records of 247 consecutive mCRPC patients who received first-line docetaxel chemotherapy between 1/1/1998 and 1/1/2010. Information on anticoagulant use, type of anticoagulant administered, indication for anticoagulation, and duration of anticoagulation were captured. Univariate and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models were developed to investigate the effect of anticoagulant use on OS.

In all, 29/247 men (11.7%) received anticoagulation (LMW heparin: 17/247; warfarin: 12/247). The indication was DVT in 15/247, PE in 9/247, and both DVT and PE in 5/247 men. In univariate analysis, anticoagulant use was associated with improved OS (any anticoagulant, HR 0.61 [95%CI 0.40–0.94] P=0.024; LMW heparin, HR 0.58 [95%CI 0.34–0.99] P=0.048; warfarin, HR 0.82 [95%CI 0.55–1.28] P=0.23). Median OS was 20.9 mo (with any anticoagulant) versus 17.1 mo (with no anticoagulant). In multivariable analysis, anticoagulant use remained a significant predictor of OS after adjusting for other prognostic factors.

Anticoagulant use is an independent predictor of OS in men with mCRPC receiving docetaxel. This finding is surprising given that the occurrence of venous thrombosis might be expected to negatively influence OS. If validated, these data may provide the impetus to explore the antitumor potential of anticoagulants in prospective clinical trials.

Effect of therapeutic anticoagulation on overall survival in men receiving docetaxel for mCRPC

Dr Caroline Pratz – Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Balitmore
 

We found that patients that were treated for anticoagulation with anticoagulation had an overall longer survival than those that did not have any clots and were not treated with anticoagulation. It was a retrospective study of 247 patients; we found that 29 patients had an incidence of VTE, or venous thromboembolism, and of those that were treated they had an overall longer survival and those that actually received low molecular heparin actually survived longer than those who were treated with warfarin.

Does this work in the same way that aspirin might?

I don’t know, because aspirin is an anti-platelet agent so that potentially could be working in a different mechanism. We unfortunately didn’t look at patients with aspirin but that also potentially deserves a further look.

What are the implications for prostate cancer treatment?

I know in our clinical care we have chosen to extend anticoagulation in patients that we potentially might have stopped anticoagulation in. Consider extending those that have had a VT incidence to continue their anticoagulation, it potentially could impact the overall survival on patients. We will probably move this forward from here and take a look back on some things.

What is the main take home message?

If I were to choose an anticoagulation agent it would be low molecular heparin for patients, rather than warfarin, and I would choose to extend it until you’ve cured their cancer but, unfortunately, in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer that’s not the case, so lifelong anticoagulation.